wesley教授
wesley教授
Founder of Block Infinity, Poker player, Trader, Chinese whale, @drhashclub
944Following
4.4Kfollowers
Feed
Livestream
Feed
The script for storage stocks these past two days is worth everyone copying down and posting on the wall: an outrageously good earnings report doesn't necessarily mean the stock price will respond accordingly.
Seagate's quarterly revenue surged 61%, the earnings report was explosive, yet the stock price didn't rise. SK Hynix boasts an 80% operating profit margin, production capacity sold out through 2029, and even handed out over ten billion USD in special dividends. The numbers look as good as an advertisement, but the stock price had already priced in this perfection before the earnings report.
This is sell the news: when everyone knows it will be good, the good itself is no longer a positive catalyst. When I short storage, I'm never betting on the numbers of this single quarter, but on the market having priced it as if it will always be this good. A high-conviction short is holding valuation, not news.
Do you think this storage frenzy is the peak of the cycle, or just the beginning?
Many people can't tell the difference between "holding a position" and "stubbornly holding on," but there's a life-or-death difference between the two.
Holding a position means you correctly identified the big trend, but the market shook you a bit in the short term, so you can endure the floating loss. Stubbornly holding on means you've clearly been proven wrong, yet you use the phrase "I have faith" to give yourself an excuse not to admit your mistake.
There are three distinctions: First, your position size is small enough that this floating loss doesn't affect your sleep; second, before entering, you set a strict invalidation line—if it’s hit, you exit without changing it on the fly; third, you never add to your position just because of floating losses to average down—that's a gambler extending their own life.
If you can't follow these three rules, you're not holding a position, you're lining up for liquidation. It's the same in poker: no matter how tempting the pot is, if your draw doesn't hit, it just doesn't hit. The difference between a hero call and throwing money away is just one word: discipline.
The Federal Reserve is very likely to cut 25 basis points on Wednesday, it's almost written on the face. But even if it really cuts, don't rush to celebrate.
Veterans never focus on whether it will cut or not, but on three other things: whether Powell will hint at "cutting again in December," whether the balance sheet reduction will stop, and where the dot plot will move. The rate cut itself has long been priced in; the wording is what moves the market.
What's even more critical is the crypto side: the stock market is rushing ahead with risk-on, the VIX has fallen below 18, but $BTC hasn't kept up at all; every rebound collapses on contact, and volume is so dry it’s like everyone is collectively holding their breath. What does this mean? Even if the Fed loosens liquidity, there isn't enough new buying power within the crypto market to take over. When all the good news is out, it often happens at the very moment everyone is waiting for the good news to be realized.
A number treated as background noise, but worth you looking up at: The Pentagon's own estimate puts the cost of the current US military operations against Iran at over $47 billion, and it's still rising. Iran, on the other hand, claims to have full control of the Strait of Hormuz.
The market is used to treating the Middle East as just talk, but this is real money burning, and the global oil chokehold is once again in hand.
What does this have to do with the $BTC in your hand? The chain is like this: oil prices remain high → inflation sticks and won't come down → even if the Fed talks about cutting rates, it dares not move too fast. This Wednesday's rate decision, the real variable has never been whether Powell wants to cut rates, but whether oil prices will allow him to. The war this year is never about the old "safe-haven gold buying" script, but about the nail called inflation.
SK Hynix's Q3 report is out, and the numbers are hot: management says memory shortages will last until 2030, HBM4 will directly become the main force in Q4, capital expenditure in 2027 will be significantly increased, and more than half of the capacity for the long-term contracts in 2027 and 2028 has already been locked in, plus a special dividend of over ten billion USD. The stock price jumped more than two points after hours.
Below is the storage short position I held into earnings night, currently showing an unrealized loss. I won't pretend—this earnings report is genuinely impressive.
But a high-conviction short bet is never on just one number tonight; it's a gamble on whether the entire AI financing chain can forever price itself relying on other people's money. I set the stop-loss line before entering; until it hits, this unrealized loss is just the cost of holding the position, not a verdict.
The short positions held in storage were held through the Hynix earnings night. Someone asked me if I was afraid.
To be honest, a high-conviction short bet is never about the numbers tonight, but about the underlying logic: the bubble in AI capital expenditure, interest rates not coming down anytime soon, and the valuation of the entire industry chain being suspended in narrative. These things won't be overturned by a single quarterly report.
But holding on doesn't mean going all in. Anyone who plays cards understands this principle: you can hold a strong hand, but that doesn't mean pushing all your chips into a coin toss. Earnings reports are binary events, with a 50/50 chance of going up or down. True discipline is reducing your position before the test so you can withstand a gap down without panic. Keep your settings unchanged, and don't shake your hand.
Will you reduce your position before earnings night, or hold bare-handed through it?
There was a divergence in today's market that many ignored: US tech and semiconductor stocks were partying together, the Nasdaq and S&P surged, and the VIX dropped below 18, showing a clear risk-on mood. But what about $BTC? It stayed stuck around eighty thousand all day, with ETH and SOL grinding along, trading volume so thin it was like the market collectively held its breath.
Stocks dare to rise, but the crypto world refuses to follow — this is no coincidence. Coinbase's premium is still negative, indicating that US spot buying hasn't truly returned. This melt-up feels more like a localized tech stock rally, with crypto left out on the sidelines.
Risk appetite has returned, but crypto remains stagnant, so the question is: is it that no one believes, or that no one has the money to catch it? After Wednesday's Fed meeting, this answer will become much clearer.
Trump declared: The U.S. will receive the first batch of 1 million barrels of Venezuelan crude oil, with "billions of barrels" more to come, saying gasoline and diesel prices will soon plummet. Whether this will be fulfilled is another matter, but this direction is worth watching.
Why is this important? Recently, many have treated the Middle East conflict as a risk-off positive, calling to buy gold and expecting oil prices to skyrocket. But the real transmission chain is: oil rises, inflation sticks, the Fed finds it harder to cut rates, and risk assets get hit together. Conversely, if oil prices are truly suppressed, the inflation thorn loosens, and the whole narrative will turn.
So don’t focus on the word "war" for trading; focus on how oil prices and inflation expectations move. Before the Fed meeting on Wednesday, this line is more important than any headline.
A piece of news worth retail investors' attention: US regulators are investigating Polymarket, with the CFTC scrutinizing whether the 2022 agreement to "prohibit US users" was actually enforced, including checks on advertising and account verification.
These days, many people rush to prediction markets to bet on whether the Federal Reserve will cut rates or whether earnings reports will beat expectations, chasing the thrill of "being smarter than the market." But have you ever thought: before the outcome of your bet is decided, the platform holding your wager is already being held down by regulators.
This is what I keep emphasizing—when you play on a betting platform built by others, the rules are never in your hands. The real risk is never just about whether you are right or wrong, but also about the layer you never accounted for. Before placing a bet, first find out who owns the table.
