Kithe
Kithe
加密爱好者｜全撸型选手 任何推文不做投资建议🫡
2KFollowing
1.8Kfollowers
Feed
Feed
Pinned
A few days ago, brothers who were farming Fomopok really got unlucky this time.
The situation I heard is that many people's wallets on their phones were emptied. The scariest part is not just ordinary phishing websites, but that they even made an iOS app, which can be directly downloaded from the store.
People used to think iPhone and iOS were relatively safe, so seeing it available on the App Store made them subconsciously let their guard down. On top of that, the attackers used a "5U promotion reward" to lure people into downloading it, making it easy to think: it’s just a small reward, so it should be fine.
But it turned out to be a classic case of losing the big picture for small gains.
Judging from the way it spread, I feel they were clearly targeting the Chinese-speaking users who farm small rewards, picking the places where people are most likely to relax their vigilance.
Most of my friends around me also got hit, luckily the on-chain assets weren’t much!
This time it’s a lesson for the brothers:
You can farm rewards and make money, but when it comes to downloading unfamiliar apps, importing wallets, authorizing, or signing, you really need to think twice.
Don’t expose your entire wallet just for a few U or tens of U rewards.
In this circle, there is no such thing as an "absolutely safe" platform, nor is downloading from the Apple Store necessarily safe.
The real protection for your assets ultimately comes down to your own security awareness.
Safety first, always more important than farming rewards!
The upgrade date is public, but the price hasn't followed
$SOL's upgrade is scheduled for mainnet activation on October 21.
The price is still around 104, down about 5.5% over the past week.
What this date means:
It's public information, not breaking news.
From the day it was announced, expectations started to be priced in.
The pitfall I actually fell into:
Waiting for a price increase just based on the calendar, without checking if the buying pressure is there.
The hotter the discussion, the harder it is to push the price up, indicating expectations are already too high.
Whether the upgrade can be successfully implemented is just the first step.
Whether people actually start using it after implementation is another matter.
Between these two steps, the price won't automatically catch up.
In the days approaching October 21, watch whether discussion volume or price moves first.
#机构资金持续流出，BTC能否企稳？
#$SOL
Bottom fishing turned into hitting the bottom, the timing of entry was miscalculated
24,100 likes, only 9 comments.
Those who liked are laughing, but they are laughing at themselves.
What does this number mean: it means the views and likes are almost one-to-one.
This shows that those who saw it didn’t argue, they just clicked.
In other words, this is not about agreeing with the opinion, it’s about claiming it.
What he actually did: at the moment of entry, he thought the price had already bottomed out.
But the "bottom" was defined by himself, not given by the market.
Position standing guard means no one is taking the orders from his hands.
The term bottom fishing itself is problematic.
It assumes there is a floor below, but actually there is only the next layer of buyers below.
If buyers don’t appear, the price keeps searching downward.
Among those 9 comments, probably no one asked where he placed his order.
#机构资金持续流出，BTC能否企稳？
#$ETH
Shorted from 1800 to 2685, what was replenished was not the position but the cost
$ETH started shorting at 1800.
The price didn’t drop, but kept replenishing up to 2685.
How this number is calculated: each time you add, the average price is pushed up a bit.
By the time it reaches 2685, the opening cost is no longer near 1800.
A common misunderstanding: adding to a position is not the same as averaging down.
The position keeps getting heavier, and as long as the price doesn’t turn back, losses are calculated based on the new position size.
The step at 2850 should have been the stop-loss point.
Failing to hold 2700 instead became a reason to add more.
What’s really lost is not the unrealized profit or loss.
It’s the stop-loss line that keeps being pushed back by oneself.
In the end, what’s left in the account is not judgment, but position size.
#VanEck停止推进Lido质押以太坊ETF
#$ETH
BTC not dropping below 10% doesn’t mean it’s resistant to decline
Global assets are falling together, $BTC’s drop hasn’t reached 10%.
Short-term traders focus on this line, thinking it has held up.
How this number is calculated:
The drop of less than 10% is compared to other assets.
Others have fallen harder, so it appears stable.
It’s not that it hasn’t dropped, but the reference assets are worse.
The moment it triggers:
On the real day of bottoming out, the first thing to move isn’t the price.
It’s the order book. Once the buy orders withdraw, 100,000 is just empty talk.
Taking it a step further, it’s easy to label it as resistant to decline, but one bearish candle can tear that label off.
Short-term traders watch who breaks first, not who falls less.
A small drop just means it’s not its turn yet.
#机构资金持续流出，BTC能否企稳？
#$BTC
Losing $3454 in a month, the problem is not the market
There were profitable days in October, but also phases of consecutive drawdowns.
The $3454 loss came from adding to positions.
How the money was lost:
When the market weakened, I didn’t stop; instead, I added more.
Each addition diluted the cost a bit, but the position size kept growing.
What controlling your hand means:
It’s not about not trading, but setting a maximum loss for each trade first.
Exit when the loss limit is reached, don’t rely on the next trade to recover.
Forcing trades in a bad market costs more than money; it also costs your judgment.
Keeping positions light lets you clearly see what you’re doing.
#机构资金持续流出，BTC能否企稳？
#$BTC