Orbit Post Sitemap
There has been a vulnerability hidden in the XRP Ledger's payment engine for over 10 years: theoretically, it could allow XRP to be minted beyond the fixed cap of 100 billion tokens out of thin air.🔍
Fortunately, it has not been exploited so far. Here's a breakdown👇
1️⃣ How it was discovered
A team used AI tools and submitted it through a bug bounty program. RippleX reproduced the issue and classified it as critical.
2️⃣ Where the problem lies
When a payment consumes a large number of offers consecutively, the amount accumulates and causes a numeric overflow: the seller receives the full amount, but the buyer is only charged a very small number, with the difference being XRP created out of thin air. The check that should have prevented this minting used the same flawed algorithm, so it failed to stop it.
3️⃣ How it was fixed
The development team released xrpld 3.4.1, coordinating with validators to upgrade first before public disclosure.
Some thoughts 💭
· Just because old code has run smoothly for ten years doesn’t mean it’s problem-free
· AI speeds up vulnerability discovery; both defenders and attackers are using it
· The fix-first-then-disclose approach sets an example for other public chains
· Node operators, please confirm you have upgraded to 3.4.1
Do you think AI auditing will make legacy public chains safer or make attacks easier?👀
This is just a personal opinion and not investment advice. Cryptocurrency prices are volatile; please be cautious.
$XRP #XRP #BlockchainSecurity #AIIn September, Bitcoin spot ETFs saw a net inflow of about $2.65 billion, indicating that institutional funds are still continuously increasing their positions through compliant channels. This is an important support for the current market recovery from the lows. Unlike retail investors chasing rallies, ETF funds tend to be more allocation-oriented, which can improve market liquidity and reduce the probability of one-sided crashes. Therefore, "institutional demand as a floor" is one of the core logics of the current market.
However, we cannot just look at the total inflow number. Citi raised the BTC target price to $113,000, reflecting a not pessimistic view on the medium-term trend. At the same time, it warned of an "ETF fund flow divergence," meaning that on a monthly/weekly level, net inflows continue, but intraday or single-day data have shown divergence—some trading days see large inflows, others see net outflows. Funds are no longer uniformly bullish. This structure often appears after a period of price increase: early on, there is consensus buying; now, some institutions are taking profits while others buy on dips. Marginal buying is no longer as clean.
The implication for the market is straightforward: as long as total inflows have not stopped, the trend has not been falsified. But increasing intraday divergence indicates rising selling pressure and disagreement above. Short-term is more likely to be volatile rather than a squeeze. In terms of operations, do not blindly interpret "ETF still inflowing" as a bullish signal—pay more attention to three types of signals: continuous multiple days of net outflows, large single-day redemptions, and price breaking key supports without fund replenishment. As long as weekly net inflows continue and prices hold the medium-term moving averages, institutional demand is still effective; once "price drops + funds withdraw" occur, the resonance repair logic must be repriced $BTC $ETH $ZEC $ONDO
Tokenized real-world assets are interesting because they connect blockchain infrastructure with familiar financial products. $ONDO operates in this space, focusing on tokenized exposure to traditional financial assets. However, the sector's growth depends on regulatory clarity, investor eligibility, liquidity, and the rights attached to each product. A larger tokenization market does not automatically guarantee proportional demand for ONDO itselfI haven't been playing with virtual currencies for long.
To be honest, I'm just an amateur.
At first, I saw my friends posting screenshots in the group every day,
which made me itch to try it myself.
Later, when I got in, I realized
those fluctuations can really keep you up at night.
I've held $BTC for a while,
wanted to sell when it went up a bit,
and panicked when it dropped a little.
In the end, after all the fuss,
I ended up paying quite a bit in fees.
I've also tried $ETH.
At the time, I thought the ecosystem was big,
but I bought at the peak,
was stuck for months,
and my mindset almost broke.
$SOL is even more unpredictable.
It can be really fast when it's fast,
and really frustrating when it lags.
Now when I look at these things,
I don't really believe in getting rich overnight,
and I definitely don't trust those in the groups shouting trade calls.
If they were really that accurate,
why would they still rely on membership fees?
Virtual currency isn't something you can't touch,
but you have to use spare money,
and be able to accept losing it all.
Don't borrow money,
don't use leverage,
don't throw in your living expenses.
I've seen people open contracts too big,
wake up to find their positions gone.
I've also seen people lose their mnemonic phrases,
staring helplessly at a bunch of addresses.
So now I basically just watch,
occasionally buy a little,
like buying a lottery ticket.
If I win, I'm happy,
if not, it doesn't affect my meals.
The news in this field moves too fast.
Today it's hot, tomorrow it's something else.
Chasing after it only makes you tired.
If you really want to play,
first understand the basics like private keys, wallets, and on-chain transfers.
Otherwise, no matter what others say, you can only nod.
Don't let a few K-lines control your emotions.
Life still has to go on normally. #CPI与PPI公布在即，加息预期迎考验
#跟着OKX打卡2049
#俄罗斯放宽柴油出口，霍尔木兹风险仍支撑油价 I think don't rush to bottom-fish ETH, institutions are still withdrawing. Last week, the US spot Ethereum ETF had a net outflow of about $542 million. OKX spot is about $2503 (Beijing 12:21).$AAVE
Lending protocols reveal a lot about the health of DeFi because borrowing demand must exist beyond speculative token trading. $AAVE supports governance of the Aave lending ecosystem, where liquidity providers and borrowers interact through smart contracts. Rising deposits alone are not enough to establish sustainable growth. Borrow utilization, liquidation exposure, revenue generation, and risk management provide a more complete picture.[Pharaoh's Market Watch]
Institutions are clearly buying, so why is BTC still falling?
Pharaoh says directly, institutions are buying "bargains," while what you see is the "short-term K-line"; the two groups are simply not on the same wavelength.
Institutions are indeed positioning. Morgan Stanley's MSBT Bitcoin ETF holdings have risen to 10,639 BTC, valued at about $880 million. Strategy, Metaplanet, and Strive, three treasury companies, collectively increased their BTC holdings by 3,334 last week, with Strategy alone buying 334 BTC at an average price of $85,838.
So why is BTC still under pressure? Three major burdens weigh it down.
First, the macro environment is unfavorable. Middle East tensions have pushed oil prices up, with Brent crude briefly hitting $102. The 10-year US Treasury yield soared to 5.36%, and the 30-year to 5.73%, both reaching 24-year highs.
Second, ETF funds are withdrawing. On October 7, Bitcoin ETFs saw a single-day net outflow of $485 million!
Third, the Fed minutes are hawkish. The September minutes show most officials believe another rate hike may be needed before year-end, with AI investments and energy prices driving inflationary pressures.
Institutions are buying "fiat depreciation in three to five years," while hedge funds are playing "this month's price spread." One group focuses on fiscal deficits and sovereign credit, the other on US Treasury yields and rate hike paths. $ETH $ZEC #机构持续布局，BTC为何仍承压？ BTC's annualized volatility has dropped to about 46% this year, compared to 84% in 2018. However, there have already been 10 "triple standard deviation volatility days" this year, more than the 8 times during the entire 2018 bear market. Simply put, it looks increasingly stable most of the time, but the number of sudden wild swings has actually increased.
After ETFs and institutional funds entered the market, BTC's usual trading depth improved, making small fluctuations easier to absorb. The longer the market moves sideways, the more confident everyone becomes to leverage up and sell volatility, thinking that daily price swings of two to three points are already significant moves.
But when positions get crowded, any sudden change in macro news or BTC breaking key price levels will trigger stop-losses, liquidations, and hedging orders simultaneously. What would have been a normal correction ends up amplified by leverage into a rapid spike.
Currently, BTC is around $82,800. I will focus on the $82,000 support and the $84,000–$85,000 resistance. Holding above $84,000 can continue to favor the bulls, while breaking below $82,000 calls for caution against a potential acceleration; I won’t heavily bet on direction in the middle of the range.
The most dangerous misconception now is not thinking BTC will fall, but assuming it won’t suddenly drop just because it has been consolidating for so long. $STRK perpetual 50x long position, opened at 0.07103, now at 0.10266, unrealized profit +2232.85%.
After stabilizing near 0.07103, it directly surged strongly with the trend. I followed the momentum to go long, setting a stop loss just below 0.07. With 50x leverage and a very small position, the movement was much stronger than expected, directly pulling up to around 0.10266, with a return skyrocketing 22 times!
Moved the stop loss up to 0.07103, now watching if it can break the 0.12 whole number level.
------
$STRK perpetual 50x long position, opened at 0.07103, now at 0.10266, unrealized profit +2232.85%. $ETH #CPI与PPI公布在即，加息预期迎考验 $SOL TAGGED ITS 24H LOW OF 108.97, THEN BOUNCED TO 109.38. On the 15m, a sharp red drop followed the 110.79 peak. Zoom out and 7D reads -10.03% while 90D shows +44.26%.
Lesson: timeframe changes the story. Will 108.97 hold if the 15m retests it?One year ago today, the market went through an extreme deleveraging, and many people's contract accounts were wiped out overnight.
That night, there was no negative policy news, nor any cooperation from external markets; it was purely liquidity being drained. Over the past year, while the US stock market kept hitting new highs, crypto has been weak all along. Ultimately, it's about slowly digesting the wounds left by that shock—both confidence and narrative were shattered, and their recovery is much slower than the price.
But it's time to look forward. Leverage is something that only has a next chance if you're still alive. Where do you think the next real turning point will be?
$BTCI used to think that things like "losing money" or "earning less than expected" were mistakes in investment, a lack of foresight. But now that I think about it, I believe that being able to execute my complete trading plan is a successful investment, even if it ends up in a loss.📊 1. Hardcore Market Analysis (15 minutes + 3 hours)
1. Small-scale structure (15 minutes): Downward stroke extension, breaking downwards
Refer to Chart 2, the "central pivot shift down" we predicted this morning has been realized. The price has steadily declined from 83,150, breaking below the morning low of 82,934, reaching a low of 82,800, and now returning to 82,877. According to Chan theory structure, the 15-minute level is currently extending the "downward stroke," with the center of gravity continuing to move down. The moving averages (MA5/10/20) form a bearish alignment around 82,950, MACD shows a death cross below the zero line, and the green bars (STICK -39.4) continue to release. This indicates that short-term bearish momentum remains, and the downward stroke has not yet been confirmed as ended.
2. Large-scale structure (3 hours): Consolidation after major central pivot support
Refer to Chart 1, the price previously precisely touched the large-scale central pivot (80,227-80,552) and then rebounded, now returning to 82,800. The large-scale central pivot support is effective. Currently, it is in a secondary retracement phase within the "downward stroke," and the direction is unclear.$BTC took a sharp hit, but instead of a decent rebound, it shrank into a narrow gap of less than six hundred dollars — after the crash, it’s not stabilizing, but stagnant water after liquidity dries up.
The price is stuck tightly at 83,000, with 80,000 below as the last strong support, and a dense wall of trades pressing between 83,000 and 85,000 above. Intraday volatility is squeezed within six hundred dollars, with both bulls and bears holding back. Such extreme narrowing usually isn’t a bottom, but a stalemate before a directional choice — no one wants to make the first heavy move, and the market is waiting for an external trigger.
Volume has collapsed to half the normal level, and every bounce is light and insubstantial, with no real money backing it up. The lower shadow is a wick, not support, indicating attempts to prop up the price at the low level, but the strength isn’t enough to sustain a rally. The whole movement is a low-volume box range, not a bottom formed by high volume.
Institutions are still withdrawing; spot ETFs have net outflows this week, with money leaking out through compliant channels. On-chain old whales are starting to stir and show signs of moving coins to exchanges, which are not signals of a bottom — a bottom is silent accumulation, not old money shifting to sell orders.
The 83,000 gap is tightly clamped today, with no one willing to reveal their hand first. The real direction will only count once this gap is torn open with volume by one side. For now, it’s a waiting game; don’t jump to conclusions prematurely. #Institutions Continue to Position, Why Does BTC Still Face Pressure?
Institutions are buying, but the price is falling; this divergence needs to be analyzed separately.
BTC dropped from 87,000 to around 83,000. On the ETF side, from October 7 to 8, there was a net outflow of $731 million; although on the 9th there was a net inflow of $21.13 million, the inflow was only 3% of the outflow from the previous two days. In other words, most of the money that left has not returned. The capital flow is bearish in the short term.
But on the other hand, institutional allocation has not stopped. Morgan Stanley's MSBT holds about 10,639 BTC, and Strive plans to continue expanding its BTC treasury through preferred stock financing. These are long-term positions, focused on value years from now, not on daily fluctuations. So institutions buying while prices fall is not contradictory; buying is slow, selling is fast, and short-term prices are driven by fast money.
Why is fast money exiting? Because of macro pressure. U.S. Treasury yields remain above 5%, energy prices stay high, and CPI data is about to be released. The market worries that if inflation doesn't drop, the Federal Reserve will continue tightening. In a high-interest-rate environment, capital prefers to wait and see until data is clear before deciding direction. BTC faces resistance near 83,000, with resistance zones from 83,500 to 84,500, and short-term support from 81,500 to 82,000; breaking below that points to 80,000.
Next, all eyes are on CPI. If core inflation is moderate and rate hike expectations cool down, combined with institutional buying and sentiment recovery, BTC has a chance to rebound and test 84,500. $BTC Sigh, staring at the screen, utterly exhausted. Even $SOL has turned against me today, only ETH is still struggling to hold on, while TRUMP continues to gnaw away at the last flesh of my account.
$ETH opened at 2495.23, current price 2499.26, long position floating profit 40.3U (+3.23%). Margin rate at 1,145%, liquidation far away at 2381. It is the only faint light in this suffocating market, yet it cannot illuminate the abyss ahead.
$SOL opened at 109.56, current price 109.23, long position turned loss of 95.99U (-5.84%). The hope from a couple of days ago has completely shattered, dragged down hard by the market. Margin rate at 853% is still safe, but it leaves a deep sense of helplessness.
$TRUMP opened at 2.7029, current price 1.8693, long position bloodily losing 833.63U, ROI -891.89%. Margin rate only 3.31%, clinging tightly to the liquidation line. The take-profit is still a dream hanging at 3.0. It’s like a bottomless pit, slowly draining everything. I don’t even have the strength to struggle anymore, can only await fate’s judgment.
A faint light can’t save the abyss, hope ultimately turns to bubbles. Holding on without stop-loss only leaves despair in the end. Tonight is destined to be sleepless again, waiting for a miracle or for the final dust to settle. #CPI与PPI公布在即，加息预期迎考验 #机构持续布局，BTC为何仍承压？ #跟着OKX打卡2049 Logic: The 4H oversold rebound repair still failed to break through the strong resistance at 83500, the 15m again fell below the short-term support at 82900, the rebound is weak, and the subsequent volume situation will be observed for comprehensive judgment of $BTC $BTC 83169 failed to break higher and dropped back down
Current price is about 82850. It touched the daily EMA20 (around 83100) this morning and was pushed back. Today's high and low are 83169 / 82636, forming a shrinking volume bearish candlestick.
Daily view (bearish consolidation):
• If it can't reclaim 83100 → first target 82600, then 82280
• If 4H/daily closes below 82280 → Bollinger lower band 81700 / previous low 80400
• Only if volume increases and it holds above 83169 and closes above 83530, then consider the middle band 84100
Don't be fooled by the false breakout in the early session. What do you think about this bearish candle? 📈Midday Market Outlook for October 11📈
$ETH Strategy:
Binance Coin (二饼) breaks through 2521 with volume on the right side to chase longs, then retract stop loss.
Break below 2500 with volume on the right side to chase shorts, set stop loss properly.
Pull back to 2451 to confirm support, add one long position; stop loss if it breaks 2404.
Binance Coin holds above 2521 on the hourly level, looking upward to 2552-2606.
Watch for a short position at 2552 on the upside; stop loss if it breaks 2606.
Left side spike orders: long at 2400, stop loss at 2357.
Resistance above: 2521-2552-2606
Support below: 2500-2451-2404
On the 4-hour level, breaking below 2500 looks downward to 2451-2404.
Binance Coin has returned to trading above 2500, indicating a temporary halt in the downtrend and a rebound is underway. However, the rebound must break through the secondary high at 2521 to continue upward toward 2552-2606; failing to surpass 2521's secondary high is ineffective.
If it pulls back and breaks below 2500, it will continue to test support at 2451. The 2500 level is the key dividing line between bulls and bears for Binance Coin. Staying above 2500 increases the probability of a rebound; falling below 2500 leads to further pullback, meeting adjournment.
$BTC $SOL
#CPI与PPI公布在即，加息预期迎考验 $ETH perpetual 100x short position, opened at 2614.2, now at 2500.01, floating profit +436.84%.
I've actually been watching this trade for quite a while. The 2614.2 level was repeatedly tested but never broken; there was strong resistance every time it approached this area. After confirming the top was valid, I decisively shorted on the big bearish candle. Using 100x leverage, with position size pushed to the extreme.
Currently floating profit is +436.84%, and the trailing stop has been moved up to 2614.2. Not greedy, locking in profits first, then letting the rest run.
------
$ETH perpetual 100x short position, opened at 2614.2, now at 2500.01, floating profit +436.84%. $BTC #CPI与PPI公布在即，加息预期迎考验 A minimum daily increase of 30% for 4 consecutive days, how many shorts does this want to kill, how many strong resistance levels have been broken, many of them. Short sellers and those trapped earlier should thank you, otherwise how would they get out of their positions Let me tell you something at noon while leaning on the table.
On October 11 last year, my friend, a real friend, not just a "my friend," had 8.8 million U explode in his account that day. The coin dropped, his position was liquidated, and he owed the exchange 17 million. He hasn't recovered in these years.
That day, the entire network liquidated 19.16 billion USD. What does that mean? The COVID crash was 1.2 billion, the FTX collapse was 1.6 billion, March 12 was 2 billion, and May 19 was only 5 billion. One day wiped out the total of all past black swan events.
Then I see $XRP is now 1.39, down 1.2% in 24h, down 6.9% in 7 days. Volume shrank, usually 30% volume, no panic selling at all, and no one is rushing to buy.
Everyone seems to have forgotten. Or rather, everyone thinks they won't be that person on that day. This is probably why one can forget 8.8 million in a year. $XRP $APR is bearish, current price 0.0755, the real pressure window has not yet opened. There are 12 days left until the cliff unlocking on October 23. We backtested large unlockings from 2024 to 2026, and underperformance against the market mainly occurs in the last 7 days before unlocking, averaging about 6%, with about three-quarters of events being negative. After unlocking, there is no stable direction. The period to watch will start in a few days. In the past 24 hours, it first dropped 30.35%. Trading volume is $100 million, with liquidations only $260,000 long and $70,000 short, a huge difference in scale. This round is driven mainly by spot holders exiting, with leveraged liquidations only a small part. The chart shows moving averages in a bearish alignment, volume increasing on declines and shrinking on rebounds, consistent with this interpretation. The rebound in the next few days will be weak; if volume can't keep up, it will continue down along the trendline. After entering the window, watch 0.0707; breaking below indicates supply expectations are accelerating realization. Conditions for a bullish reversal: in the last 7 days before unlocking, daily closes reclaiming above 0.1101, meaning the pressure has been preemptively digested by this drop. About 542 million was withdrawn in one week, with BlackRock alone bearing nearly 90% of it.
The US Ethereum spot ETF saw a net outflow of about $542.1 million in the week ending October 9, the largest single-week outflow since late January; a total net outflow of about $697.2 million over 9 consecutive trading days. BlackRock's ETHA had a weekly outflow of about $477 million, accounting for about 88% of the entire category. At the time of writing, OKX shows BTC at about 82,862 and ETH at about 2,501.
I think the real signal is: the outflow has continued for nine days straight without stopping; whether it continues to pull out next week is more important than the single-day numbers.
Do you bet that this week's outflow will stop first, or that it will continue to drop?
Keep an eye on it; when the next batch of ETF flows come out, I'll continue to analyze.
$ETH $NEAR
NEAR's gains expand, but why is it still worth watching the lost ground above?
Today's early spot 24-hour observation window: range 4.927—5.439 USDT, change +7.47%, trading volume about 27.06 million USDT.
The price is higher than yesterday's observed value but has not yet controlled the highest price in this window. Continuous leading and profit-taking can occur simultaneously; high elasticity still requires confirmation from the low point in the next pullback, and net gains alone cannot be tracked.
If multiple attempts to surge near 5.439 are sold back, first observe supply digestion; only if it breaks through and does not fall back below the upper half of the old range should the judgment on demand sustainability be raised. 0.09976!
Just 0.00024 short, it didn't even touch the 0.1 mark, and it chickened out on its own.
I've been staring at this number for a long time.
A coin that rose from 0.017 all the way to 0.099, nearly a fivefold increase, logically should have pushed through the integer barrier in one go.
But it stopped right here, like hitting an invisible wall, then turned around and dropped.
What is this?
This means even the whales don't dare to buy above 0.1.
That tiny gap is a psychological bait for retail investors, making you think "It’s about to break 0.1, rush in and you can still get a piece."
And the result? $CAP crashed from 0.09689 down to 0.08265, swung back and forth twice, and now is shrinking around 0.09.
Those who chased in are all stuck above 0.095.
I shorted in at 0.09031, and I’m very confident about the direction.
This short position isn’t betting on an immediate crash, but that it no longer has the strength to push through 0.1 again.
If it dares a fake breakout, I dare to add to my short.
If it continues sideways, I’ll wait for it to exhaust the buy orders on its own.
$BTC
$ETH
#CPI与PPI公布在即，加息预期迎考验 Having done quantitative trading for over two years, what I most want to verify is not "which strategy yields higher returns," but a more fundamental question:
Is a strategy with high returns but large drawdowns really better when combined in the same account with a strategy that is steady but modest? Or is it just recalculating the average of the two?
I reran 4.92 years of data, and the two numbers are cleaner than expected:
① They are almost "invisible" to each other — the correlation coefficient is only +0.037. The most typical example is 2023: leg A −16.6%, leg C +29.3%, while the underlying asset itself rose about 90%. In the same up year, one lost and one gained.
② On days of sharp drops, they automatically stand on opposite sides — among 259 days when the underlying dropped more than 3% in a single day, leg A averaged +1.42%, leg C averaged −0.43%, totaling +0.99%. Days when both legs lost simultaneously accounted for only 2.6%.
Limitations must be stated clearly: all backtests, no live trading; live trading only 18 trades over 25 days, insufficient to support conclusions; the 2.6% figure is based on about 4 years of samples, with a thin tail.
So now I don’t focus on correlation, but on the worst drawdown of a single leg — treating it as a tail risk issue rather than a correlation math problem. What do you think?
(Personal research record, historical backtest data, not investment advice.)
$ETH Challenge to break even before the end of October
Recording the current loss of 4250u, total profit -46.5%
Performance reinforcement methods:
1. Short PONS with low leverage for long-term holding, holding onto floating profits.
2. Continue holding the losing short position on BTC.
3. Short RIVER with 5x leverage, LAB with 10x leverage.
4. Short MAGIC around the 0.010 level.
Review compared to yesterday’s loss of 50u, LAB’s profitable short position surged, profits retreated again. PONS profits also retreated.
Continue holding, altcoin pumps and dumps are uncontrollable, so use low leverage.
We cannot see tomorrow’s weather and temperature with the naked eye, but we can see the big trends of spring, summer, autumn, and winter. So for these short positions, I will continue to hold. Profit retracement is one thing, but I must also withstand the emotional ups and downs.
Strictly follow trading discipline, set stop-loss lines, altcoins within 10x leverage, mainstream coins within 20x. Protect the principal, opportunities are always there. $STRK When the tide goes out, you find out who's been swimming naked
From the weekly chart perspective, the recent high for strk is 0.27, and the current price is 0.16, leaving about 70% room between the two prices
Looking at this trend, it kind of makes me want to challenge the 0.27 high
But as I write this, strk has already started to adjust
My tense nerves can finally relax
Looking back at my strk trades, I still couldn't resist adding positions
I opened two contract grids, and currently, they are still at a floating loss
You must respect the market
Leave enough volatility space for altcoins
Today, when strk rose to 0.19, I already started to feel a bit nervous
If I hadn't opened grid contracts, I probably wouldn't have felt this way
This made me hesitant to add positions at the high point
I can only wait for it to drop, at most reducing losses
My strategy still has a lot of room for optimization
For example, I need to control my impulses
Don't add positions when it's not the right time
Because if you add and the market moves in the opposite direction, you'll be in a very passive position
Adding positions by widening the price gap will, in the long run, actually earn moreThis is about BTCPay Server (a self-hosted Bitcoin payment tool).
Previously, this tool might have automatically enabled Tor (the onion network, a network that hides your real IP and makes access more private) for you by default, or you could use it without worrying about it. But starting from the next update, the rules have changed: the system will no longer "secretly" enable Tor for you, but will give you the choice yourself.
In other words, if you usually log in and manage your BTCPay backend using the .onion hidden address (for example, to avoid being tracked or to protect your privacy), you must manually check the "Enable Tor" option in the settings before the update. If you forget to check it or never selected it, after the update your original Onion address will no longer be accessible, effectively cutting off this private access route.
To put it simply: previously, your back door (Tor channel) was always slightly open, so you could use it anytime; now the landlord says, "After the next renovation, the back door will be locked by default, and if you want to use it, you have to notify me in advance." If you don't say anything, after the renovation you can only use the front door (normal IP access).
So, this message is a reminder to Docker users: quickly check your settings, don't wait until after the update to regret not being able to access it. If you don't use the Onion network at all, it doesn't matter; but if you rely on it, this is a must-do "key point before the exam". $BTC $ETH $ZEC This year, some exchanges have successively delisted the CORE/USDT trading pair (including CoinEx's announcement on September 11, 2026, with trading closing on September 18), drawing close attention from token holders. 👉🏻Information Summary ★Exchanges delisting spot trading Phemex Spot: Delisted CORE/USDT at 10:00 UTC on July 3, 2026, with deposits and withdrawals closed simultaneously. CoinEx Spot: Announced on September 11, 2026, CORE/USDT trading closed at 16:00 (UTC+8) on September 18, 2026. ★Exchanges delisting contracts Phemex Contracts: Delisted COREUSDT futures at 07:00 UTC on January 30, 2026. TEBBIT: Delisted CORE/USDT perpetual contracts at 18:00 (UTC+8) on February 24, 2026. AEGET: Delisted COREUSDT contracts at 14:00 (UTC+8) on February 25, 2026. BingX: Delisted standard and perpetual COREUSDT contracts at 14:00 (UTC+8) on March 24, 2026 (spot trading unaffected). HTX: Delisted USDT-margined perpetual CORE/USDT at 16:00 (GMT+8) on April 2, 2026. 👉🏻Short-term impact Delisting directly cuts off some trading access points, causing liquidity to deteriorate significantly. The order book thins, making prices more susceptible to large orders and increasing volatility. Token holders ifSingle Coin Contract Fluctuation｜Last 15 Minutes
$CHIP decline accompanied by position reduction. Price -3.36%, open interest -7.11%; trading volume 5.476 million USDT, 3.0 times the 15-minute average volume converted from the previous hour.$AXS I'll be straightforward, the AXS market is ridiculously volatile. Damn it! Around 1.21, the manipulators placed a bunch of fake orders, pulling up once and smashing down three times, clearly shaking out weak hands to accumulate. Daily volume is shrinking, MACD has a bearish crossover heading down, any rebound is just serving the bears. My short position entered at 1.2159, stop loss set at 1.26, target first at 1.12, if broken then 1.05. Don't ask why, capital battles are just this simple and brutal. If you want to follow, check the real-time price on the token card below, don't say later you weren't warned. Follow or not, risk is on you.🚀
👇👇👇#OpenAI营收口径引争议，AI投资回报受关注, this narrative cooling down is causing funds to flow back into mainstream coins, UNI has therefore received some support. My overall judgment is short-term weakness, but the downside buying is resilient. Current quote is 7.489, up only 1.4% in 24 hours, with a turnover of 10,834,000, and low capital participation; the funding rate of 0.0028% is neutral, and the open interest of 5,601,000 coin-margined contracts shows no obvious increase in longs. The top 10 order book buy-sell ratio is 0.52, with sell orders at 24,000 outweighing buy orders at 12,000, and both 1-hour and 4-hour charts are downward, sellers still dominant. Strategically, lightly short near 7.628 on the rebound, stop loss at 7.734, target 7.362; if it falls to 7.318 and buying replenishes, a short-term long is possible, stop loss 7.244, target 7.486, position not exceeding 20%.
——This is only a personal opinion and does not constitute investment advice. Wish you successful trading.——
$UNI#TSMC Q3 revenue hits a new high, what other highlights are there in the October 15 earnings report?
#OpenAI营收口径引争议，AI投资回报受关注 $UNI Don't pretend when you're making money, and don't be discouraged when you're losing money. Life itself is tough, so there's no need to look at those making money and brag about how miserable they were before they succeeded. Suffering is never worth glorifying; just appreciate it yourself. Focus on the coins you believe in, keep an eye on them, and seize the right opportunity to bet in. Without betting, where will the opportunity come from? Frequently switching between various coins is more likely to cause losses, turning success into something that smells like nonsense, and failure means starting over. The outcome is still uncertain; you and I are both dark horses. No matter how impressive they are, they won't give you a penny. If you can't make it yourself, you haven't spent a penny of theirs either. Respect yourself, keep going, young warriors.BTC barely moved around 830, ETH quietly returned above 2500, SOL at 110, consolidating for three days. For the first time, Ethereum showed a bit more strength than Bitcoin during this consolidation. This detail is worth mentioning. In the previous sharp drop, Bitcoin fell by six to seven percent, ETH and SOL dropped by nine to ten percent, and weaker coins were crushed even more. During these three days of consolidation, we can see that funds haven't left the market; they are just shifting slightly within core assets. While Bitcoin was resting, some capital supported ETH. This indicates that the underlying market sentiment is risk-averse but not retreating; the chips remain in play, waiting for a direction. Now about the weekend. After the U.S. stock market closes tonight, traditional markets will be closed for the next two days, and liquidity in the crypto space will noticeably thin out. When the market is quiet, the price action is most deceptive. A relatively small amount of capital can cause Bitcoin to spike or dip by several hundred dollars, faking a breakout above 835 or poking down again at 810. This is not surprising but mostly a false move caused by liquidity drying up, not representing the true directional choice. So the weekend principle is clear: don't chase sudden rallies, don't panic at sudden dumps, wait for Monday when U.S. stocks reopen and volume picks up; then the truth will reveal itself. Continue to follow your discipline in trading: hold your spot positions firmly, do not cancel orders near the second buying level around 80,000 unless volume shrinks and stabilizes with visible support, and keep the third buying level at 78,000 intact. Consolidation days are indeed boring, but looking back, before every major market move, the market uses boredom to weed out the impatient. Have a good weekend rest, let the market move on its own, and I will report any changes immediately.PIMCO warns that the 10-year US Treasury yield could reach 6%. If US Treasuries continue to be sold off, high-volatility assets like those in the crypto market will be the first to be hit. BSB will find it hard to remain unaffected. I lean towards a short-term bearish defensive stance.
BSB current price is 0.09957, down 4.5% in 24 hours, with a trading volume of 1.176 million. The funding rate is only 0.0050%, and open interest is 12.545 million. Although there was a rebound in the last hour, the 4-hour trend remains downward, having fallen 12.62% from the 4-hour high. The top 10 buy orders total 3,776, exceeding the sell orders at 3,017, with a ratio of 1.25, indicating support at lower levels. However, 0.09883 is a key support; if broken, the area around 0.10643 will act as resistance above.
Strategy-wise, lightly short near 0.10395 with a stop loss at 0.10715 and a target of 0.09725; if it pulls back to 0.09875 without breaking, a short-term long position is possible with a stop loss at 0.09685 and a target of 0.10485. Do not exceed 3% of total capital per trade. Set stop loss before opening a position and avoid holding losing trades.
— This is only a personal opinion and does not constitute investment advice. Wishing you successful trading. —
$BSB#PIMCO警告10年期美债收益率或达6%
#PIMCO警告10年期美债收益率或达6% $BSB "Weekend Market Closed, But My Mind Isn't Resting"
I originally planned to spend the weekend on the couch with takeout, but then my phone rang, and the CHIP screenshots in the group chat exploded like fireworks. Getting rich is for others; feeling frustrated is for myself.
$BTC 82,933, -0.10%, hovering back and forth between 82k and 83k, like an elevator stuck halfway, neither going up nor down. My break-even line is above, harder to cross than the morning rush hour. The main players probably really need my few hundred bucks; otherwise, why drag it out like this?
$ETH 2,503, -0.29%. Last night it touched 2,518, and I nervously set a take-profit order, which now looks like a joke. Selling, afraid it will soar; holding, afraid it will fall. 2,500 feels like a prison gate, pacing back and forth inside, draining my energy.
$CHIP 0.06625, +27.87%. In the middle of the night, it shot up from 0.05 to 0.07 in one move. I watched the whole time but didn’t dare to jump in. Those bitten before first check the scars when they see meat. Chasing is impossible; I can only watch others feast, feeling sour to the point my molars ache.
Forget it, no money made, and I can’t lose more over the weekend. Closing the app, instant noodles with egg, whatever happens, happens. The market is closed, not me.
#CPI与PPI公布在即，加息预期迎考验
#机构持续布局，BTC为何仍承压？ #PIMCO警告10年期美债收益率或达6%，若真兑现，风险资产承压将拖累CL，我对短线反弹持续性偏谨慎。当前91.16，24h微涨0.6%，走势看似企稳，实则暗藏分歧。1小时上升但4小时仍降，距4小时高点-4.92%，反弹力度受限。
盘面看，24h区间90.58至91.31，成交额135.7万，量能偏薄。订单簿前10档买单6.4万对卖单3.3万，买卖比1.96，买方占优；资金费率0.0000%、持仓34.1万，情绪中性偏多但未过热。
策略上，回踩90.62可轻仓接多，止损89.84，目标92.15；若冲高至92.35附近滞涨，可反手短空，止损93.06，目标90.95。仓位控制在两成以内，破位即走，不扛单。
——仅为个人看法，不构成投资建议，祝交易顺利。——
$CL#PIMCO警告10年期美债收益率或达6%
#PIMCO警告10年期美债收益率或达6% $CL Crypto Market Bidirectional Magnet: It Rebounded, but the Bears Haven't Given Up Yet!
After Trump ruled out strikes on Iran before the midterm elections,
BTC rebounded near 82000, but large outflows from crypto ETFs had already occurred.
Whether the easing of geopolitical risks can reverse institutional withdrawals remains a key controversy.
As of this morning, market and liquidation data:
$BTC ｜82980
Below 82215, about 62.9 million long liquidation chips;
Above 83890, about 53.5 million short liquidation chips.
Both sides have magnets; whichever side breaks through may accelerate.
$ETH ｜2505
Above 2534, below 2484, each with about 37.9 million liquidation chips.
Short-term space is limited, but leverage is not light.
$SOL ｜110.09
Looking up to 111.10, down to 108.92, liquidation scale on both sides is about 7 million.
Altcoins are more sensitive to volatility; beware of amplified swings following BTC.
Short-term view:
First, see if BTC can break through 83890; if it falls below 82215, beware of a chain liquidation of longs.
Don't rush to bet on direction; wait for the market to reveal its cards first.
Do you think this rebound is a reversal signal or a bull trap after short covering? #CPI与PPI公布在即，加息预期迎考验 Every mid-month, OKX Square is full of people posting financial calendars. When data is released at 8:30 PM, the Bitcoin market often plunges or spikes by hundreds or thousands of points within a minute, causing both longs and shorts to get liquidated. Many people only watch the spectacle without even understanding what these two English abbreviations stand for, and end up getting stopped out by sudden spikes. Spend three minutes to fully understand these two terms, and you won’t have to rely on others’ reactions when reading macroeconomic news in the future. 🚩What exactly do these two indicators measure? CPI stands for Consumer Price Index, reflecting the everyday living expenses of ordinary people like buying groceries, fueling up, and paying rent. PPI stands for Producer Price Index, reflecting the wholesale costs of factories purchasing steel, oil, and finished goods. To put it simply: imagine the entire economy as a bubble tea shop. PPI is the wholesale price the shop owner pays for tea leaves, fresh milk, and paper cups. CPI is the price you see on the menu for a cup of bubble tea. If upstream raw materials keep rising in price (PPI goes up), the owner will grit their teeth and endure for a while but will eventually pass the costs onto customers, causing the bubble tea price at the front counter to rise (pushing up subsequent CPI). Conversely, if raw material prices keep falling (PPI continuously declines), the pressure to raise retail prices at the front counter will significantly ease. The Federal Reserve officials who manage monetary policy look at whether the bubble tea at the front counter is expensive or not to decide whether to inject liquidity or tighten it. If prices rise too aggressively, they have to keep bank interest rates high and withdraw dollars from the market; if prices cool down, they can safely lower rates.Institutions continue to position themselves, so why does BTC still face pressure? This sentiment also extends to MMT, with funds on the sidelines causing short-term pressure, but the structure remains intact. I tend to view this as a pullback to accumulate momentum rather than a bearish reversal.
Current price is 0.1782, down 1.3% in 24h, with a high of 0.1846 and a low of 0.1778. The trading volume is only 381,000, showing weak momentum. Both the 1-hour and 4-hour trends are upward; the short-term price has pulled back 2.52% from the 1-hour high, and there is still 6.96% room from the 4-hour low. The order book's top 10 levels show 20,000 buy orders against 17,000 sell orders, with a ratio of 1.14, slightly favoring buyers; the funding rate is 0.0050%, open interest is 8,495,000, sentiment is mild, and no overcrowding is observed.
In terms of operation, lightly add long positions on a pullback to 0.1773, with a stop loss at 0.1739 and a target of 0.1841; if volume breaks through 0.1849, increase positions aiming for 0.1903. Keep position size within 20%, and do not add if stop loss is hit.
— This is only a personal opinion and does not constitute investment advice. Wishing you successful trading. —
$MMT#机构持续布局，BTC为何仍承压？
#机构持续布局，BTC为何仍承压？ $MMT CPI and PPI announcements are imminent, and interest rate hike expectations face a test, putting short-term pressure on risk assets. $SNDK is sensitive to this; I judge a bearish consolidation with weak rebound.
Current price 1591.3, down slightly 0.1% in 24h, turnover only 24,000, showing strong hesitation. Both 1-hour and 4-hour charts are downward, respectively -7.81% and -11.30% from highs, approaching the 24h low of 1587.2. Order book buy/sell ratio is 0.49, indicating obvious selling pressure; funding rate is zero, open interest 47,000, sentiment is cold.
Strategy: lightly short near 1602.5 with stop loss at 1611.8, target 1573.6; if it falls to 1578.4 and stabilizes, consider a short-term long with stop loss at 1569.2, target 1596.3. Position size no more than 20%, reduce before data release.
— For personal reference only, not investment advice, wishing you successful trading. —
$SNDK#CPI与PPI公布在即，加息预期迎考验
#CPI与PPI公布在即，加息预期迎考验 $SNDK Bitcoin has experienced 10 days of triple standard deviation moves this year, surpassing the entire 2018 count, with spot turnover on OKX at $83,040.6 and the funding rate stuck at -0.0024%.
On OKX, BTC turnover is at $83,040.6, with the funding rate at -0.0024%. This year, there have been 10 days of triple standard deviation moves. If you hold positions, be cautious of sudden intraday spikes. This morning, I switched to the data page to review CoinDesk's recap. There have been 10 extreme days with single-day volatility reaching triple standard deviation this year, directly exceeding the 8 days in all of 2018. Bitcoin's annualized volatility has dropped from 84% that year to 46%, and the average amplitude on abnormal days has narrowed from 10% to 7%, but these short-term spikes are coming more frequently than in previous years.
This morning, I checked the OKX contracts page. The total open interest for perpetual contracts across the platform stands at $7.771 billion, with BTC accounting for $3.08 billion, altcoin contracts at $2.952 billion, and the altcoin-to-BTC open interest ratio at 0.959. Switching to the BTC perpetual page, the funding rate is at -0.0024%, indicating shorts are subsidizing longs, with an annualized negative rate of around -0.0024%. On-exchange funds are not piling on leverage. The fear and greed index is steady at 61 (greedy). The total market capitalization across the network is $2.81 trillion, with Bitcoin's market dominance at 59.11%. Both longs and shorts are trading cautiously around the $83,000 level.#CPI与PPI公布在即，加息预期迎考验
The biggest current market dilemma is whether inflation will rebound again, directly rewriting the Fed's year-end interest rate pricing.
PPI reflects prices at the upstream factory level, while CPI reflects prices for end consumers. PPI typically lags and transmits to CPI by 2 to 3 months. These two data points, released sequentially, serve as the core test to determine whether "inflation is a sticky rebound," directly disproving or confirming the current CME interest rate futures' rate hike pricing.
1. Current Market Baseline Expectations
The market has already pre-traded a baseline scenario:
Interest rates will remain unchanged in October, with most rate hike bets pushed to December. The current market pricing shows a very low probability of a rate hike in October. The vast majority of traders assume that unless there is an "explosively surprising" inflation report, the Fed will not act in October and will continue to wait and see.
However, with recent rises in crude oil and energy prices, the biggest risk emerges: energy price increases can easily push PPI higher first, then after some time permeate into services and transportation, pulling core CPI back up. Once inflation rebounds, this narrative of "delaying until December" will be instantly overturned. After the sharp drop, I watched the market for a long time. The quality of this rebound really feels different 🌙. Do you think this time it's a genuine recovery, or is it another beautiful leveraged fund pump? BTC climbed back to around 83,100 after this big wick, but many only see the price returning and overlook the changes on the derivatives side. On the 1D chart, the SAR resistance is stuck at 86,399. This level is not drawn arbitrarily; it corresponds exactly to the previous dense liquidation zone. In other words, the bulls must prove themselves by first absorbing this chunk of chips. I’ve been watching closely and found several key signals: - The funding rate hasn’t gone crazy along with the price, indicating this rally isn’t driven by high leverage pushing it up - The open interest in perpetual contracts is rising, but at a moderate pace, as if spot buying is leading the rhythm rather than contracts hyping themselves - Around 83k, multiple quick pullbacks happened, and the willingness to support below is stronger than expected - 86k is the emotional watershed; only by holding above it can 90k be discussed The bullish path is actually quite clear: as long as 86k is effectively broken and held, short covering will accelerate, and market risk appetite will shift from "defense" back to "testing." ETH and major altcoins usually breathe easier along with this. Conversely, if 86k repeatedly fails to break, the derivatives side can easily become overcrowded with bulls. Once the funding rate turns positive too quickly, it actually gives a reason for a downward shakeout. What I care about more is not whether it can touch 90k this week, but whether this recovery has repaired the leverage structure healthily. The price coming back only Russia relaxes diesel exports, supporting oil prices, with limited risk appetite spillover; KAITO struggles to gain significant boost, I lean towards weak consolidation. The four-hour and one-hour moving averages are declining, the former has fallen nearly 14% from the high, the short-term is only 2.6% below the high, with weak rebound momentum. The funding rate of 0.0005 is relatively neutral, with a position of 10.5 million coins and a turnover of 6.86 million, incremental funds are cautious. The top ten order book shows 127,000 buy orders against 107,000 sell orders, the buy side is slightly stronger but cannot change the downward structure. Key support is at 0.3137, resistance at 0.3245. Strategy: lightly short at a rebound to 0.3238, stop loss at 0.3286, target 0.3142; if a sharp drop stabilizes at 0.3152, consider a short-term long, stop loss at 0.3118, target 0.3221. Position size should not exceed 20%, exit immediately if broken.
——This is only a personal opinion and does not constitute investment advice. Wish you successful trading.——
$KAITO#俄罗斯放宽柴油出口，霍尔木兹风险仍支撑油价
#俄罗斯放宽柴油出口，霍尔木兹风险仍支撑油价 $KAITO Russia's easing of diesel exports hardly changes the risk premium of the Hormuz Strait, with oil prices remaining firm and indirectly suppressing crypto risk appetite. SOL is under short-term pressure but bottom buying remains; I lean towards a rebound after weak consolidation.
Down 0.6% in 24 hours to 109.19, with a high of 110.74 and a low of 108.89. Trading volume is relatively low at 3.088 million. Both the 1-hour and 4-hour moving averages are trending downward, with a 12.01% retracement from the 4-hour high. The top 10 buy-sell order ratio is 1.14, slightly favoring buyers. The funding rate is 0.0093%, relatively neutral. Open interest stands at 3.044 million with no significant reduction. Bearish momentum is marginally weakening but the trend has not reversed. Resistance is at 111.35, support at 107.65.
Lightly buy on a pullback to 108.45, stop loss at 107.35, target 111.20; exit and wait if volume breaks below 107.65. Position size should not exceed 20%, leverage strictly controlled, do not hold through a break.
— This is only a personal opinion and does not constitute investment advice. Wishing you successful trading. —
$SOL#俄罗斯放宽柴油出口，霍尔木兹风险仍支撑油价
#俄罗斯放宽柴油出口，霍尔木兹风险仍支撑油价 $SOL 800 million USDC less in seven days, I've watched this twice carefully.
First, to be clear: Circle issued 9.7 billion this week and redeemed 10.5 billion. More went out than came in.
What is USDC? It's the most reliable money in the circle. Those playing contracts, doing lending, or waiting for large transfers basically all use it.
So its shrinkage doesn't mean the coin price will fall. But it does indicate one thing: someone exchanged stablecoins back to dollars and stopped playing.
I guess two types of people. One who earned enough and withdrew first, and one who thinks the interest outside is more attractive.
You ask if this is bearish? I don't think so. An 8 billion drop from a 73 billion pool is just a sprinkle.
But the direction is worth noting. Money is flowing out of the circle, not in.
From now on, I'll watch one number: whether USDC continues to shrink next week. If it keeps shrinking, then it's no coincidence.
#机构持续布局，BTC为何仍承压？
#贝森特拟查扣10亿美元伊朗相关加密资产 #OKX以250亿美元估值完成战略融资 $BTC $STRK rose about 90% in one week, then another 40% in 24 hours, reaching a market cap of $768 million, entering the top 100 by market cap for the first time in a year. Interestingly, right after the surge, it announced: it wants to become an independent layer, fully quantum-resistant by 2027.
The logic is simple — layer 2 security inherits from Ethereum; the base layer is not quantum-resistant, so no matter how hard layer 2 tries, it’s in vain. Ethereum plans to complete its quantum upgrade by December 2029. Starknet proves that based on hashing and account abstraction, it can avoid hard forks to change signature algorithms, seizing this window.
So this 90% gain isn’t for the technology itself, but for the pricing power of buying time. The cost is running its own validators and consensus, with the bill only spreading out before 2027. Do you think this is a real demand or just storytelling again?
$STRK