Orbit Post Sitemap
#Strive增持3311枚BTC，高息融资能否持续？ $BTC
Bought 3,311 BTC in one week, with the average price rising from about 79,500 to about 84,500.
▪️ From 10/5 to 10/9, purchased 3,311 BTC at an average price of approximately $84,500
▪️ Holdings increased from 29,462 BTC on 10/2 to 32,773 BTC
▪️ The last disclosure (9/14–9/18) was 1,355 BTC at an average price of $79,475
▪️ During the same period, $208 million in warrants were exercised, about 15.3 million remain, expiring on 10/13
▪️ The $100 minimum issuance price has become a binding clause in the governance documents
▪️ Weekly purchase volume expanded about 1.4 times, with the average price rising about 6% simultaneously
The disagreement is not about how many were bought, but at what cost these 3,311 BTC were acquired.
Volume is increasing, and price is also rising—the exercise of warrants brings equity, not operating cash flow. Including exercise, expiration, and minimum issuance price in governance documents indicates this round of expansion relies on capital instruments. Once financing costs rise, the pace of accumulation will respond before the coin price.
The direction is to wait and see—only if accumulation continues smoothly after the warrants expire can financing be considered smooth; otherwise, the pace will slow down first.#高盛Q3业绩超预期，美银行财报现分化
Same earnings report, stock trading +72%, fixed income −1%.
▪️ Q3 net revenue $18.68 billion, up 23.1% year-over-year, $1.79 billion above consensus
▪️ Stock trading revenue $6.44 billion, up 72% year-over-year; last quarter $7.42 billion was a record high
▪️ Net profit $5.294 billion, up 29% year-over-year; diluted EPS $17.01, consensus $13.02
▪️ Fixed income, FX, and commodities revenue down nearly 1% year-over-year, below expectations
▪️ After earnings, pre-market up over 3%, early trading up nearly 4%
▪️ CEO Solomon warns AI and data center financing demand is huge, but not every project will succeed
The divergence is not about beating expectations, but that two directions appear simultaneously in the same earnings report.
Stock trading +72%, fixed income −1%, these two figures come from different corners of the same balance sheet: the former profits from volatility, the latter from spreads and inventory. When interest rates are high, stock volatility increases while bond market trading thins out, causing the strengths of a full-service investment bank to shift.
The direction is to wait and see — fixed income turning positive next quarter would mean a full recovery; continued divergence means volatility remains the strength.Breaking down the buzz into orders
For $TIA's business, I first look at how much the developers have actually spent. Projects using Celestia to publish data need to pay fees priced in TIA, with costs related to transactions and data size. This requirement is straightforward, but does an increase in data volume necessarily mean a proportional increase in revenue? It depends on the actual charges. If capacity expands and unit costs decrease, using more might only bring limited revenue growth. So I prefer to look at paid data volume, unit charges, and total fees together. The number of connected projects is impressive, but order amounts are needed to support judgment.
What’s worth studying about $LINK is the revenue conversion step. According to official introductions, enterprise business income and on-chain service fees can accumulate into LINK reserves through a payment conversion mechanism. I track how much the reserves actually increase and whether the increase is sustained. Reserve accumulation and destruction should be calculated separately; tokens entering reserves do not automatically reduce total supply. The mechanism exists, but the actual execution scale determines the economic significance.
For $JTO, first distinguish between two types of rights. JitoSOL carries staked assets and related earnings, while JTO handles network governance functions. When studying staking business growth, I continue to check income distribution and governance proposals rather than directly attributing staking earnings to JTO holders. What’s truly worth focusing on later are which rules, once implemented, can create sustained demand for this token. ETH is stuck at 2503, repeatedly grinding along the middle Bollinger Band. The MACD histogram just turned green, and the RSI has already hit the overbought zone. This kind of short-term impulsive move diverging from overbought conditions is most vulnerable to a wick liquidation.
Around 2501.9, there is a large accumulation of long liquidations. The price is hugging the upper edge, and as long as it breaks below 2496, the first wave of forced liquidations will be triggered, instantly opening liquidity below. When the red light came on, I glanced again at the liquidation chart. In these dense long-short liquidation zones, the main players like to trap both sides.
There is also a considerable amount of short liquidation from 2550 to 2600 above, but chasing shorts at the current price is likely to get stopped out first. So I neither chase longs nor short at the current price. Instead, I try shorting in batches from 2508 to 2516, with a stop loss at 2541 and take profit initially at 2472, pushing down to 2440 if broken.
If the one-hour close holds above 2545, all short positions should be closed unconditionally and reversed to short-term longs, targeting 2585 with a stop loss at 2520.
$ETH
#阿斯麦财报前瞻：EUV订单成关键看点
@OKX星球 $SOL This 100x short SOL position's unrealized profit has surged wildly to 515.66%, with the main bearish phase completely eaten up, resulting in an extremely impressive profit cushion.
Looking back, entry was at 112.67; after high-level selling pressure was released, the bearish trend smoothly pushed down. The current mark price is 106.86. At zero-level spacing, under 100x extremely high leverage, it directly exploded to over 5.1x returns, with very fierce downward momentum.
Currently, 106.86 is approaching the 106.5 and 105 integer support levels and previous low support zones. Passive buying at low levels will inevitably be dense, and volume may shrink at any time. With 100x extremely high leverage combined with over 500% huge unrealized profit, although the profit is very thick, SOL as a highly volatile popular asset experiences especially intense order book fluctuations (often accompanied by sharp manipulative spikes from major players). Even a slight reverse pullback can instantly wipe out most of the profit or even trigger liquidation. The tail-end cost-performance ratio has dropped to freezing point.
Following the trend is easiest. At the current price, it is strongly recommended to close out more than 95% (or even fully close) to lock in profits, leaving a very small residual position with stop loss firmly nailed at the cost line (or significantly raised breakeven line to ensure absolute profit safety). Keep a close watch on the 105 and 100 support levels. If volume breaks through, a very small residual position can be left to float; if volume shrinks and price stagnates or any upward spike occurs, exit fully. Protecting real cash is the key; extremely high leverage only eats the body of the fish, not the tail. $BTC $ETH #九月CPI今晚公布，美联储加息分歧待解 On October 7, the yield on 30-year U.S. Treasury bonds briefly rose to 5.706%, hitting a new high since 2002. Many people's first reaction was: with such a high yield, is it time to buy long-term bonds? Basman’s reminder goes the other way—if the 20-year yield breaks 6%, some institutions might actually speed up selling.
The issue lies in the delivery rules of Treasury futures. Sellers can choose from a basket of Treasuries the one with the lowest delivery cost after conversion, and the conversion benchmark is set at 6%. Once market rates continue to rise, the most suitable bond for delivery will switch to a longer-term, more interest rate-sensitive one.
Basman’s report on October 13 calculated that the duration of the relevant delivery bonds rose from about 11 to 13.24, and after further switching, it could exceed 17. Without increasing positions, the same interest rate volatility causes amplified gains and losses. For institutions with risk limits, this is enough to trigger position reductions or increased hedging.
Leverage will further amplify the process. Many funds borrow money to buy Treasury cash bonds while simultaneously selling futures to earn the spread. When volatility spikes, margin requirements rise or financing becomes difficult, they can only sell cash bonds and buy back futures to reduce exposure. The original Treasury buying demand directly turns into selling pressure.
Therefore, the higher the yield, the more attractive long-term allocation may indeed be, but short-term prices depend on how concentrated the selling is and whether buyers have enough funds to absorb it. Institutions can remain optimistic about long bonds but may sell first due to risk limits and cash needs. Silicon Valley Bank fell into the same trap initially.The key test this week, the “CPI,” is about to be released, marking an important turning point for the financial markets this week. How should the data be interpreted? How should the US stock market, BTC, and bond market be priced normally? According to current expectations, the nominal inflation rate (yearly/monthly) is rising, mainly due to the energy price shock. Core inflation shows a monthly decline and a slight yearly increase. This data combination implies short-term inflation is slowing down, but long-term inflation remains sticky or under pressure. Nominal inflation is driven by the energy shock. Considering recent expectations released by Federal Reserve officials, it aligns with no rate hike in the short term but retains the expectation of a rate hike in December. Previously, I mentioned that from a conspiracy theory perspective, assuming data can be manipulated, the Fed’s goal is simple: to raise rates once in September as an insurance measure, then adjust the next rate hike expectation to December through data, no hike in October, and observe economic data for two months. As the December meeting approaches, the data will gradually weaken the possibility of a December hike. If actual inflation is controllable, the hike could be postponed to Q1 next year or even canceled altogether. #九月CPI今晚公布，美联储加息分歧待解 Of course, all premises depend on whether the CPI, PCE, and employment data for September and October support this. Currently, the PCE statistical method has changed, so the key is to watch the CPI. As long as the CPI is not excessive, data will gradually weaken before the December meeting, which is a healthy rhythm—neither overheating the market nor letting the market naturally expect rate hikes to self-limit liquidity. Back to the point, tonightWatching the market has become a bit exhausting; altcoins and mainstream coins are quietly swapping places again. Do you have that feeling where the overall market barely moves, but the coins in your hand seem like their soul has been sucked out? I've been reviewing $CORE's data these past two days, and it gave me a jolt. If the number of nodes keeps dropping and falls below the threshold of 10, the risk can no longer be covered by the word "correction"—that basically means a soft exit. But on the flip side, if the nodes hold steady at 16 without dropping further, and BTC staking volume is still rising, then in the short term, there's a bit of a safety net. The worst-case scenario is the third script: BTC staking withdrawals accompanied by node reductions; two bad news hitting together, then it's no longer just an emotional issue. Back to the sectors. Recently, BTC is like the steady sister firmly sitting in the main position, with narrowing volatility and funds not rushing out. ETH is trying to perform but lacks confidence, following the rise but not the fall, occasionally pushing hard but then softening again. Altcoins are in a sorry state, especially those projects that rely on node narratives to support their valuations; once the data loosens, they run faster than anyone else. $CORE is a typical example; its current price is actually trading not on technology but on the expectation of "whether the nodes remain stable." What is the market pricing? I think it's pricing the thickness of the "safety cushion." BTC holders are now less willing to stake their coins, preferring to keep them in cold wallets. ETH staking outflows aren't that dramatic either, but the willingness to stake altcoins is visibly declining. This transmission is subtle: the more stable the mainstream, the harder it is for altcoins to grab attention, because people's risk appetite hasn't disappeared, it's just become more selective. The more bullish path is also Recently, there has been an interesting phenomenon in the market. Everyone is focused on BTC's price fluctuations, yet they overlook a potentially important factor affecting the market: crude oil prices. To be honest, this time I am more concerned about the inflationary pressure brought by oil prices in the CPI. According to market forecasts, the overall US CPI year-on-year for September may reach 3.6%, while the core CPI is expected to be around 2.5%. Why is there such a big difference between the two? Because the core CPI excludes food and energy prices, while the overall CPI is directly affected by rising energy prices such as gasoline. This means that even if overall inflation rises, it does not necessarily mean that all goods are increasing in price simultaneously. But here’s the problem. If oil prices remain high, transportation and production costs may gradually increase, eventually passing on to the prices of other goods. This is what the Federal Reserve really needs to be wary of. 📊 Now let's look at why BTC might be affected. The logic is actually not complicated: Oil prices rise → inflationary pressure increases → expectations for rate cuts weaken or expectations for rate hikes strengthen → US Treasury yields may rise → risk assets like BTC come under pressure. Of course, this is not an inevitable outcome. If the CPI is lower than market expectations, US Treasury yields may fall back, and BTC might actually get a breather. 💡 The two data points I am most focused on now are: One is whether the overall CPI exceeds expectations. The other is whether the core CPI shows a significant rebound. If the overall CPI rise is driven only by energy, while core inflation remains stable, the market may not be as pessimistic as imagined. I think tonight really #美银调查揭示股债分歧，贝莱德提前增配短债 $BTC
In the survey, 37% of the money is still in tech stocks, while the trigger for convertible bonds is set at 6%.
▪️ Bank of America October survey (10/2–10/8, 161 respondents): net overweight in tech rose from 30% to 37%
▪️ This is the highest level since August 2020; semiconductors have replaced AI concepts as the most crowded trade
▪️ 37% believe the 10-year US Treasury yield must reach 6.0% before switching from stocks to bonds
▪️ 19% believe the current yield level is sufficient for them to shift to bonds
▪️ BlackRock has already shifted to increasing allocation in short-term bonds; Bridgewater's Dalio says the US Treasury bear market is far from over
▪️ Cash positions slightly increased, risk appetite has cooled down
The disagreement is not about who is right between stocks and bonds, but whether the survey measures position size or judgment.
The net overweight of 37% records the positions already bought, not the degree of bullishness; the 37% who think the switch to bonds happens at 6% measure a threshold not yet reached. Money is still in tech stocks, and the trigger for convertible bonds is set at 6%—the stock-to-bond switch will not happen prematurely, it will only occur passively after yields move first.
The direction is to wait and see—if the 10Y yield does not hit 6%, positions continue; if it hits, allocation shifts may be released in concentration.#US-Russia Diesel Cooperation Faces Congressional Opposition, Ceasefire Conditions Still Divided $BTC
Whether this arrangement can be implemented depends not on the negotiation table, but on Congress.
▪️ The Trump administration plans to use Russian diesel exports to the US as leverage to push Russia back to the negotiating table
▪️ The arrangement has sparked bipartisan opposition in Congress, with disputes extending to legal authorization and ceasefire enforcement
▪️ The UK, Germany, Estonia, Sweden, and others have expressed disapproval
▪️ The UK Defense Secretary said this move is largely motivated by midterm election considerations
▪️ Trump announced on 10/11 that Russia and Ukraine have entered an "energy ceasefire" state, claiming both sides have agreed
▪️ Analysts believe short-term additional Russian diesel supply is limited and delivery capacity is uncertain
The disagreement is not about whether diesel prices will drop, but about how many approvals this arrangement must pass through.
At the executive level, what can be signed is authorization; at the legislative level, it concerns the boundaries of sanction exemptions—bipartisan opposition targets the latter. Authorization can be reversed, but exemptions require legislation. What determines whether this arrangement can become a long-term supply is not the statements at the negotiation table, but whether Congress is willing to provide it with a stable legal framework.
The direction is to wait and see — only a shift to long-term contracts or exemption legislation counts as increased supply; remaining at authorization is merely a price disturbance.Tonight (October 14) at 20:30, the US September CPI will be released. Market expectations are already quite consistent: overall CPI year-on-year rising from 3.4% to 3.6%~3.7%, month-on-month about 0.6%; core CPI year-on-year steady at 2.4%, month-on-month about 0.22%, slowing compared to August's 0.29%.
The key point is: the overall inflation jump has already been priced in by the market because the driver is gasoline (September average price over $4.3 per gallon, a record for the month, with the Iran conflict pushing oil prices high), which is considered a "one-time disturbance." So tonight, what truly determines the direction of cryptocurrencies is the core CPI, not the overall CPI. Don't go all in yet; wait and see the PPI data tomorrow night.ASML's Q3 revenue in euros was slightly below expectations, but slightly exceeded expectations in US dollars. This difference in measurement is not significant by itself; the key point is that EPS exceeded expectations by 20.8%, indicating improvements in cost control and a higher proportion of high-margin products. The quality of profit is better than the revenue figures.
This is the third consecutive quarter of upward revisions to the outlook. The Q4 net sales guidance is €14.2 billion to €15.2 billion, while analysts previously expected around €13.97 billion. Such continuous upward revisions usually mean that management sees an extended order visibility.
Some customers have already started expressing purchase intentions for equipment in 2029 and 2030. The existing supply plans for 2027 and 2028 can no longer fully meet demand. Buyers willing to queue up in advance for years not yet arrived says more than a single quarter's performance.
Demand has outpaced capacity, so the constraint is no longer order volume but how many units can be produced. ASML's capacity ceiling is the upper limit for the entire downstream AI hardware expansion speed. With scheduling pushed to 2030, the barrier to entry is no longer just about wallet size.
The official plan is to continue exploring the possibility of further capacity increases in 2028, building on the previous 30% expansion target. This signal should be viewed in conjunction with another fact: if the pace of expansion cannot keep up, some customers may not get the delivery times they want, and no matter how strong the demand, it will not translate into current period revenue.#Anthropic plans to disclose Q3 results, valuation may reach $2 trillion $ANTHROPIC
The $2 trillion figure needs to be supported by the quarterly report for the first time.
▪️ Plans to disclose Q3 financial data to institutional investors this Wednesday
▪️ Reasonable valuation range given by potential investors is $1.8 trillion to $2 trillion
▪️ Confidential filing submitted to the SEC, S-1 not yet public, plans to go public in November
▪️ Previously leaked IPO materials: $42 billion loss, $4.6 billion revenue, $518 billion computing power commitment
▪️ Independent agency New Constructs values at $150 billion, about 93% lower than the target
▪️ If it happens, it will surpass SpaceX's IPO scale
The disagreement is not about whether $2 trillion is high, but that this figure needs to be supported by the quarterly report for the first time.
The valuation from private rounds comes from the judgment of a few and can remain unverified; once the quarterly report is disclosed, pricing power shifts from old shareholders to buyers. New Constructs uses $150 billion versus $2 trillion, a 93% difference—one based on current revenue, the other on future computing power commitments. The quarterly report disclosure puts the differences on the same table.
The direction is to wait and see—only if quarterly revenue matches computing power commitments is it solid; if not, the valuation will converge to the lower end. Jeonbuk Bank in South Korea issued a corporate loan, including Bitcoin as supplementary collateral. The company already had a credit loan, and after adding BTC, the credit limit increased, allowing them to obtain Korean won for operational turnover, with Bitcoin entrusted to a third-party custodian. The interest rate and collateral ratio have not been disclosed.
A longstanding issue for companies holding coins: they believe in the long-term value and don't want to sell, but need cash for payroll and payments. Previously, they could only cut losses or let assets sit idle. Now, if holdings can help companies secure bank loans, they don't necessarily have to sell coins when short on cash. The premise is passing the bank's credit review.
For banks to accept Bitcoin as collateral, three issues must be resolved first: its value, custody, and how to liquidate in case of default. Jeonbuk Bank established a valuation system based on prices from multiple exchanges, conducted stress tests for sharp declines, and arranged court enforcement procedures for liquidation and recovery within the loan structure.
The significance of this loan is not in the amount but that the bank has fully implemented valuation, custody, and default handling. Accepting new collateral is not just a statement; it depends on whether the process can be operationalized. Bitcoin entering traditional financial workflows is what counts as having practical financing use.
This case cannot yet be considered a trend. Interest rates, collateral ratios, and applicable scope have not been disclosed, and it is uncertain whether other banks will follow. But for companies holding coins deciding on long-term holding, there is now an additional variable to consider: whether the Bitcoin on their books can be converted into operating funds. Among the youth in contemporary China, an increasingly prominent and irreversible phenomenon is occurring: more and more young people who once explored, lost money, or became disheartened in the A-share market, once they truly engage with and enter the world of cryptocurrency trading (commonly known as “coin speculation”), almost never return to the A-share market. They are not simply "switching platforms to speculate"; rather, they undergo a comprehensive reconstruction from institutional experience, power structures, opportunity density, to psychological expectations. The A-share market, as a product of the Web2 era, is essentially a market centered on financing; whereas the Web3 world presents characteristics closer to an "open rights network." Once this difference is personally experienced, it creates a strong path dependency—not because cryptocurrency necessarily makes people rich overnight, but because it redefines the power relationship between "participants" and the "system." This article attempts to systematically analyze the deep reasons behind this phenomenon. It is not simply a summary of "gambler’s psychology," but unfolds across multiple dimensions including institutional design, infrastructure experience, empowerment of rights, opportunity structure, and market ecology. The contraction of opportunities and narrowing of wealth accumulation paths that young people face in the real economy sharply contrast with the high leverage, high liquidity, and composability presented in the Web3 world. When a person truly experiences "being able to immediately collateralize and borrow after buying assets, form liquidity pools to earn yields, and trade global assets with almost no friction," then returning to the A-share market’s state of "passively holding after purchase, leaving gains or losses to fate, and constantly having to guard against major shareholders’ sell-offs," it becomes... What conditions are needed for OKB to return to $200?
Many people believe OKB will eventually return to $200.
But what’s really worth studying is not whether it can rise, but why the market would be willing to value it at $200?
📊 Let’s do some math:
Currently, OKB is about $122, with a total supply of 21 million tokens.
▪️ $122: correspondsThe Philadelphia Semiconductor Index experienced an intraday reversal today. It initially plunged sharply due to two major negative factors: rumors that OpenAI's actual annualized revenue is far below market expectations, causing investors to reassess the input-output ratio of AI hardware investments; and rumors of breakthroughs in domestic memory technology, which further shook market confidence in the semiconductor cycle.
Subsequently, funds aggressively pushed prices up, significantly narrowing the sector's losses. Previously deeply fallen stocks like $INTC, $AMD, and $MRVL rose more than 1% against the trend, while $NVDA, $AVGO, and $TSM all turned positive.
On the same trading day and with the same group of stocks, the decline was interpreted as a problem with the AI input-output ratio, while the rise was seen as long-term funds unwilling to exit. The so-called reversal often doesn't mean the news changed, but that the people willing to take over the positions changed.
The leaders in the rally were mainly those that had fallen deeply earlier or offered better value, with $INTC and $MRVL being the most obvious. The main players did not chase the overheated top performers but moved towards undervalued areas like self-developed chips and network connectivity.
This week, $TSM and $ASML will release earnings reports. The early session dive saw risk-averse funds fleeing, but the buying strength at low levels was not weak, with clear actions to buy before earnings at a low price.
In the short term, semiconductors are likely to experience wide fluctuations and will not rush to new highs. The market is shifting from speculating on AI concepts to screening stocks based on earnings reports, with different stocks moving independently within the sector. A market-wide rise does not mean every stock will rise, and intraday rallies do not yet confirm a bottom.The complexity of BTC as an asset in the past three weeks has been very high, influenced not only by macro factors such as interest rate policies and government bond yields, but more so because the price is in a sensitive "bullish" zone, where capital flow and chip structure largely dictate the market. To better understand this "bullish" area, I illustrate with detailed price movements: when the price first surged near 88000, holders of 6m–2y positions in the 88350-89200 range reacted around their average cost line, after which the price retreated. After a clear support was found near 83000, the market began oscillating and exchanging hands within the 83000-85000 range, digesting a large amount of chips. During this process, new institutions and whales indeed entered to establish long positions. Observing through URPD, a new chip accumulation zone formed between 83300-84600. Although this large volume of turnover provided strong support for the next upward move, profit-taking of similar scale and the awakening of long-term holders above the cost line upon the price's first approach also brought significant selling pressure. The market then made several attempts to digest the upper chips in the 86000-87000 range, but the last attempt on October 7 showed obvious signs of fatigue, marking an ideal point to establish short positions. Subsequently, the market continued to decline after a plunge, falling back through the chip accumulation zone. It is worth noting that the price drop up to this point was still mainly due to spot market sell-offs and active profit-taking liquidations as well as forced liquidations on the USDT-margined contract side. Illinois wanted to impose a digital asset tax, but got held back by its own people first.
The state government agreed to issue an injunction, postponing enforcement until July 1, 2027. Sounds like a win for the crypto community? Don’t rush.
I took a close look at the timeline: the first motion won’t be submitted until November 2026, and all paperwork won’t be finalized until January 2027. The lawsuit hasn’t even really started; the schedule is already pushed to next year.
To put it plainly, this isn’t a victory; both sides just want to drag it out and get the court to give a ruling quickly. The industry association is filing motions together with the state government, the scene is quite harmonious, but essentially neither side wants to waste resources.
Impact on the market? Basically none. This kind of state-level tax litigation is miles away from affecting coin prices.
But there is one signal worth noting: here in the U.S., even tax collection has to pass through the courts first, indicating that crypto’s compliance path is increasingly resembling a legitimate industry, no longer just executed on a whim.
If you ask me whether this is good or bad news, I’d say it’s neutral, maybe even a bit boring.
The real question is: by the time the ruling comes in 2027, will this tax still be enforceable? What do you think?
#BTC现货ETF再度净流出，机构买盘能否回暖？ $HYPE 📊 【BTC Deep V Review】Sharp drop, rebound, and another decline, chips are changing hands
Yesterday BTC formed a deep V pattern: first a bull stampede with 170,000 liquidations totaling $815 million, long positions accounted for $689 million; then the liquidity gap was filled, but with no new funds, it was merely a technical correction; finally, a drop at the close, reflecting that after selling pressure eased, ETF demand remains weak and buying is insufficient.
Three structural signals are worth watching:
1️⃣ Whales and ETF accumulation: whale holdings rose to 3.03 million BTC; spot ETF net inflow this year turned from a net outflow of 83,000 BTC to about 2,300 BTC, indicating long-term chips are changing hands.
2️⃣ Large funds leverage up, retail withdraws: in September, institutional-level USDT borrowing over $10 million increased by 83.3%, while retail borrowing decreased by 17.2%, showing chip concentration.
3️⃣ MSTR premium turning point: Strategy holds 848,250 BTC, worth about $70.6 billion at current prices, but market cap is only about $51.1 billion. The stock-for-coin model no longer enjoys a premium; this cycle's qualitative change deserves attention.
#MarketStructuralSignals A whale is selling $BTC and buying $ETH.
This week, he has sold BTC worth $89,000,000 and bought 36,159 ETH.
As I mentioned earlier, the upside potential of ETH this cycle may far exceed that of BTC.The market summary in one sentence: BTC is still hovering above 83,300, ETH is stuck at the 2,500 mark, and the whole market seems to be waiting for something. Waiting for what? I think it's waiting for the macro environment to give a direction first—the situation around the Strait of Hormuz has pushed oil prices above $102, the old script of inflation and interest rate hikes is being replayed, and risk assets are collectively tensing up. The fear index is at 40, not panic, but no one dares to make the first move. Let's first settle the previous round's accounts (the batch of 3 picks at 14:01, checked by direction): ETH short at 2,502.89, closed near 2,498, -0.10%, hit—but the magnitude is pitifully small, this kind of hit can only be called a "lucky guess"; LINK short at 12.875, instead slightly rose 0.09%, missed; ZEC long at 1,249.03, dropped 0.79%, missed. Overall hit rate 33%. Honestly, the luck was average, the problem is not with the signals themselves, but that there is hardly any profit to be made in a sideways market. This round of 3 picks (data as of 18:30, Gate.io perpetual contracts): 1. ETH short @2,500.49, stop loss 2,522.12, take profit 2,464.44. The logic remains unchanged: spot ETH ETF has had net outflows for eight consecutive days, totaling $640 million withdrawn, institutions are structurally exiting. But there is a counterintuitive point here—the funds are flowing out every day, yet the price hasn't collapsed, the 2,500 mark is repeatedly tugged back and forth. Who is taking the dip? To be continued STRK unlocks 127 million tokens monthly for 6 consecutive months, with frequent positive news, yet reasons for easy downward adjustment remain analyzed
Core summary: Unlocking 127 million tokens monthly is equivalent to 6 consecutive rounds of targeted issuance, continuously increasing circulating supply; the positive news belongs to long-term narratives, while the unlocking selling pressure is a tangible supply increase at present. The positive outlook is a future expectatTonight at 20:30, the US will release the September CPI, which is the last inflation report before the Federal Reserve's October 27-28 meeting. Bitcoin is fluctuating around $83,000 (rebounding from 81,435 to 84,158 in 24 hours, but never breaking above 84,000), Ethereum is around 2,500, and SOL and XRP spike only to be pushed back down — the entire market is waiting for a signal, and no one dares to move first. Two numbers decide everything: overall CPI year-over-year (expected 3.6%-3.7%) and core CPI month-over-month (expected 0.2%). The former is partially priced in, but the latter is the real policy switch. The Fed focuses on core inflation excluding energy and food because it reflects demand-side heat. The core month-over-month unexpectedly rose to 0.3% in August, pushing the probability of a rate hike in September from 70% to 87% — that's the power of 0.1%. Stephen Juneau from BofA Securities sets the dividing line: core month-over-month at 0.2% keeps the October rate hike probability around 17%; if it reaches 0.3%, the probability will rise above 30%. Scenario A: core month-over-month ≤ 0.2% BTC is expected to break through the 84,500-86,000 resistance zone (where about $3 billion in sell orders are stacked) and head toward 87,000; ETF outflows pause or even slightly reverse; altcoins follow BTC but with weaker momentum — insufficient order book depth is a major weakness. Scenario B: core month-over-month 0.3% may break the key support at 80,000. The order book depth in this area is only about $33 million, and shallow depth means a "pin" risk; a valid break would then$ENS
I've been holding this in about ENS all day.
So many people rushed in at the start, saying it was the golden domain name of web3, like buying downtown land early on. But what happened? The land is still there, but the brokers keep holding meetings to change the rules. Now there's a proposal for v2, saying old domains don't have to be forcibly moved, which sounds good, but I can't feel happy about it at all.
It's dropped so much, and everyone in the group chat is silent. Those
#DailyOrbit #Goldman Sachs Q3 Earnings Exceed Expectations, US Bank Earnings Show Divergence
The boss has something to say
Goldman Sachs' Q3 earnings exploded. Net revenue was 18.68 billion, earnings per share 17.01, all surpassing expectations. Stock trading revenue increased 72% year-over-year, which was the main driver. Citibank also posted its best Q3 in a decade.
But bank earnings are divergent. JPMorgan's fixed income trading weakness dragged down performance, Wells Fargo's revenue fell short of expectations, and credit costs are still rising. With high market volatility, trading businesses profit, and high interest rates push up interest income, but at the same time suppress bond trading and corporate financing.
My judgment is that investment banks like Goldman Sachs, which lean towards trading, benefit, while traditional banks are under pressure. This indicates money is flowing into capital markets, not into the real economy.
No direct impact on crypto. But Goldman Sachs' large increase in trading revenue indicates market volatility is amplifying, which is not friendly to crypto and tends to cause back-and-forth swings. Plus, the 30-year US Treasury yield at 5.7% and high interest rates are weighing on risk assets.
My long position at 82,800 was stopped out today; I am now flat. I won’t catch a falling knife before CPI is released. Bank earnings are industry validation, not a directional switch. The real determinants of Bitcoin's direction remain inflation data and US Treasury yields.
No chasing highs or panic selling lows; set stop losses properly. $BTC $ETH $ZEC
The above analysis is time-sensitive; positions must have stop losses set. Good luck.$BTC BTC holds above 80,000, the real shortage is incremental funds
Bitcoin at $80,000 seems stable, but the funding situation is not easy. Last week, Bitcoin spot ETF saw a net outflow of about $679 million, and Ethereum ETF had a net outflow of about $542 million, totaling over $1.2 billion. The price hasn't dropped significantly, but money keeps leaving, and this divergence is more worrisome than a sharp decline.
This indicates institutions are not necessarily panic selling but are more likely actively reducing risk exposure. With the Fed hawkish, the dollar and U.S. Treasury yields high, risk appetite is suppressed, and the crypto market lacks fuel for sustained rallies. The key variable remains the October 14 CPI: if inflation exceeds expectations, risk assets may face more pressure; if data is moderate, it could open a rebound window.
So, don't treat every rebound as a bull market restart. The real focus is on two things: whether ETF funds can shift from outflows to inflows, and whether BTC can hold key levels on pullbacks.
Is it bottoming or a downward continuation? The answer is not in sentiment but in the capital flow. Patience is more valuable than predictions.
#九月CPI今晚公布，美联储加息分歧待解
#BTC现货ETF再度净流出，机构买盘能否回暖？
#交易之声：你的经验值得被听到
$BTC $ETH $ZEC $STRK’S RALLY FACES A SUPPLY TEST. ⏳
$STRK surged 214% over 30 days but has now dropped around 16% in the past 24 hours.
On Oct. 15, another 127M STRK tokens unlock: 🔹 66.61M for early contributors 🔹 60.39M for investors
That’s about 1.3% of total supply becoming available, not an automatic sell-off.
The big question now: Can demand absorb the potential new supply?
#DailyOrbit $BTC 🔥 Evening Report
Last night the market experienced a sharp drop, with BTC and ETH both facing significant selling pressure, but short-term funds started to flow back today. The question is whether this rebound can continue; tonight's CPI is crucial.
From the capital flow perspective, $BTC saw a net spot inflow of $13.73 million in the past hour, and $ETH had a net inflow of $13.27 million, indicating that short-term buying has indeed begun. However, the 4-hour and 24-hour data remain weak, showing that the previous selling pressure has not been fully absorbed. $SOL's situation is even weaker, with spot funds still showing net outflows over 1-hour, 4-hour, and 24-hour periods, and no obvious improvement yet.
Tonight, the US will release the September CPI, with market expectations of a 3.6% year-over-year increase and a 0.6% month-over-month rise. If the data exceeds expectations, inflation pressure may continue to push up interest rate expectations; if it falls short, there may be a chance to give risk assets some breathing room.
I will focus on three signals: whether BTC's rebound has sustained buying, whether ETH can hold steady after a pullback, and whether $SOL's capital flow can turn from negative to positive.
The short-term capital inflow is a positive signal, but the trend reversal is still one step away. How the market moves after tonight's data release is the key.🔥 $xTSM $TSM TSMC Q3 revenue hits a record high, but the real test starts tomorrow!
How crazy is the demand for AI chips? TSMC has already given the answer.
📊 Latest data:
• Q3 revenue: 1.49 trillion NTD, up 50% year-over-year
• September revenue: 511.86 billion NTD, up 54.6% year-over-year
• Cumulative revenue for the first three quarters: 3.9 trillion NTD, up 41.1% year-over-year
Revenue exceeding expectations indicates that AI chip demand remains strong. But what truly determines the next move in the stock price is profitability and future guidance.
Why? Three key points:
1️⃣ AI demand remains the core engine.
Customers like Nvidia are driving TSMC’s continuous growth with their demand for advanced processes and advanced packaging.
2️⃣ Revenue growth does not equal proportional profit growth.
The market expects Q3 net profit to grow about 65% year-over-year, but costs of advanced processes, overseas factory investments, and exchange rates may all impact profit margins.
3️⃣ The real highlight is future guidance.
TSMC previously forecasted a Q3 gross margin of 65%–67%. If actual performance exceeds expectations and the full-year revenue growth guidance is raised, it could further strengthen the bullish logic on the AI industry chain.
My judgment: The record-high revenue already proves strong demand, but whether the stock price can continue to rise depends on whether the earnings report can surpass the market’s already priced-in expectations. #台积电Q3营收创新高，盈利表现待揭晓 On-chain data reveals a counterintuitive truth: while retail investors panic over unrealized losses, a whale known as "Maji" is building a continuous cash flow machine using three high-leverage positions in opposite directions. His most glaring unrealized loss reaches 4.86 million, but what truly deserves analysis is not the loss itself, but the funding rates working in his favor. First, consider the most counterintuitive part. The $BTC short position is leveraged 40x with 243 contracts, showing an unrealized profit of 260,000, but over 50,000 has been paid in funding fees—this is a machine that "prints money slowly as long as there is no sharp rally." On the other side, the $ETH long position is leveraged 25x with 8,700 contracts at an entry price of 2546, showing an unrealized loss of 400,000, betting on ecosystem recovery, but the funding fees keep draining capital, and time is not on his side. The most dramatic is the HYPE short: the 4.86 million unrealized loss grabs the most attention, yet it has accumulated over 1 million in funding fees; under 5x leverage, the crowded shorts have become a cash machine, continuously generating cash flow as long as the price doesn't crash. The three-pronged strategy has distinct roles: short $BTC to profit from volatility, long $ETH to bet on recovery, short HYPE to capitalize on sentiment spreads. But the essence of high leverage remains unchanged—the whale can withstand unrealized losses, while ordinary traders may be liquidated first💥. The real decisive factor lies in the $BTC direction: once the market moves into a one-sided trend, this structure will face a stress test. One judgment worth remembering: survival is always more important than guessing the right direction🧠. Funding rates are the invisible engine of this strategy and also its most vulnerable point—when rates reverse, all three machines may shut down simultaneously.#France Advances Proposal for Crypto Self-Custody Reporting
[Old Leek Observation] France's crypto regulation sparks controversy again: Do you have to report your own wallet to regulators?
The crypto industry has always upheld a core principle: assets are kept in wallets controlled by oneself, with private keys held personally. But as regulations become more detailed, a practical issue grows more prominent—when assets don’t go through centralized exchanges, how can regulators track the flow of funds?
Recent discussions on crypto asset regulation in France have once again put wallet reporting and asset transparency in the spotlight.
However, let’s clarify the facts first: France already requires reporting for some overseas crypto accounts, and service providers may have obligations to report transaction information; this does not mean the government currently requires everyone to register all self-custody wallets. It still needs to be confirmed which specific proposal the so-called "advancement of self-custody reporting" actually refers to.
If future rules extend to wallets controlled by individuals’ private keys, the controversy will be more than just filling out an extra form. Regulators aim to increase tax transparency and prevent illicit fund flows, while users will be concerned about personal privacy, the scope of reporting, and the potential consequences of linking wallet addresses to real identities.
For ordinary holders, the most important thing is not to assume the self-custody era is over just by seeing the headline, but to clearly distinguish: which accounts are legally required to report, which information service providers report, and what obligations individuals actually bear. $BTC $ETH $SOL STRK unlocks 127 million tokens monthly for 6 consecutive months, with frequent positive news, yet reasons for easy downward adjustment remain analyzed
Core summary: Unlocking 127 million tokens monthly is equivalent to 6 consecutive rounds of targeted issuance, continuously increasing circulating supply; the positive news belongs to long-term narratives, while the unlocking selling pressure is a tangible supply increase at present. The positive outlook is a future expectation, while saleUnderstanding the deep V-shaped BTC volatility logic from yesterday makes everything clear!
Yesterday's deep V-shaped BTC movement seemed thrilling but was actually logically clear. Intraday, a rapid drop was triggered by concentrated long liquidations, with over 170,000 people liquidated, and long position liquidations accounting for the vast majority, causing the market to instantly panic. Then, as liquidity replenished, the market rebounded, but it must be clear that this rebound was only a technical correction without new capital inflows, and not a signal of a trend reversal. The subsequent decline was mainly due to continued weakness in institutional ETF buying, lacking effective support.
Currently, the market shows three core structural changes: First, top whales continue to accumulate coins, with total holdings steadily increasing, and ETF funds shifting from net outflows to slight net inflows, quietly concentrating long-term chips; Second, the market capital structure is completely diverging, with institutional funds leveraging against the trend while retail investors continue to panic exit, accelerating chip exchanges; Third, macro uncertainty makes short-term trends more prone to volatile shakeouts rather than one-sided breakouts.
In the face of this structural divergence, blindly chasing highs or selling lows easily leads to being "hit from both sides." Instead of being led by short-term fluctuations, it is better to focus on two core indicators: whale holdings and ETF fund flows. When chips continue to concentrate in long-term holders and institutional funds gradually recover, that is the real signal worth positioning for. Until then, patience and maintaining your own rhythm are more important than guessing short-term ups and downs. #九月CPI今晚公布，美联储加息分歧待解 Core Bull-Bear Logic
Dimension 📈 Bullish Signals 📉 Bearish Risks
Technical 82,972 support effective; resistance encountered after surging to $83,709; MACD red bars shrinking; moving averages in bearish alignment
Capital ETF net inflow of $176 million yesterday; exchange holdings dropped to 2.67 million units; Strategy continues to increase holdings; previous week saw ETF net outflow of $679 million; ETH ETF outflows for 9 consecutive days
Macro Williams rules out rate hikes in 2027; October rate hike probability about 18%-20%; CPI exceeding expectations probability not low; December rate hike probability about 70%
Institutions Saylor clearly states "the bull market has arrived," target 100,000; Wintermute warns Bitcoin remains sensitive to US stock volatility, downside risk is relatively high
Sentiment Fear & Greed Index at 63 (Greed), market not in extreme panic; forecast market bets probability of falling to $80,000 within October about 56% $BTC $ETH $ZEC #特斯拉交付超预期后盈利修复成焦点 $BTC
What is still missing for BTC's rebound?
The triple test of CPI, real interest rates, and spot buying
The key to BTC's rebound is not just whether CPI cools down,
but whether inflation data can lower real interest rates and ultimately translate into sustained spot buying.
① CPI below expectations opens space for monetary policy shift;
② Real interest rates fall, reducing the opportunity cost of holding BTC;
③ Continuous net inflow of ETF funds proves that incremental capital is truly entering the market.
Forward-looking judgment: If favorable CPI does not lead to a decline in real interest rates and a return of spot funds, the rebound is more likely a short-term sentiment repair;
Only when macro pressure eases and spot accumulation continues can BTC hope to move from an oversold rebound to a trend reversal.
The real signal is to see if there is new capital buying behind the rise.#九月CPI今晚公布，美联储加息分歧待解
Brothers, Brother Ci speaks ahead of time. At 8:30 tonight, the September CPI will be released, don't rush to bet on the direction.
Focus on the core, not the overall. The overall year-on-year expectation rose from 3.4% to 3.6%-3.7%, largely contributed by oil prices; the core month-on-month may drop from 0.3% to 0.2%. If the core cools down, it means inflation hasn't spread, and the expectation to pause rate hikes will be stronger; if the core also exceeds expectations, the probability of a rate hike in October will immediately rise.
Officials are still arguing. Harker, Williams, and Collins all said there might be another hike this year, but no one is clear about October. CME shows: about 77% chance of no change, about 23% chance of a 25 basis point hike. Officials are hawkish, market is dovish, this gap is the source of tonight's volatility.
BTC is fluctuating around 82,000, down slightly 0.15% in 24 hours, direction undecided. If the core is mild and the dollar and US bonds fall back, look for a rebound at 83,500-84,500; if the core is strong, first look at support at 81,500-82,000, break that and look at 80,000. Control positions before the data, wait for it to land before following funds.
⚠️ The above is only personal opinion, not investment advice, the market is volatile, profits and losses are your own responsibility.
#九月CPI今晚公布，美联储加息分歧待解 $BTC $BTC $ETH $XAU 🪤🪤🪤
After the last big nonfarm payrolls pump and dump, it was obvious 📉📉
Wall Street's attitude is clear—they're not buying it.
Bitcoin also dropped below support right after another pump and dump,
then started moving sideways~🥱🥱
However, tonight will most likely set the direction.
The CPI released at 8:30 PM tonight
will determine whether the Fed can reignite rate hike expectations 🆘🆘
Personally, I think tonight's data will be close to expectations; the market has already accepted that inflation has risen compared to last month~
If it exceeds expectations, even just a little, it would be quite bearish!
As for being below expectations, I don't think that's possible, since the US-Iran conflict keeps oil prices quite high, so inflation can't come down!
Also, Mr. Trump said he wouldn't escalate attacks on Iran before the midterms?
I think he'll break that promise; Iran is currently strengthening its defense systems during the ceasefire, so maybe, at any moment, they'll exchange heavy rocket fire again 🌚🌚
Regarding the midterms, I think Trump will most likely fail; his approval rating is already below the minimum threshold!
Additionally, yesterday's deep V-shaped rebound was caused by the chain reaction from the Korean index crash, combined with Bitcoin and Ethereum falling to support levels, triggering massive short position take-profits and reverse buying, which pushed the market back up to the previous drop point—there's nothing else to do~
#九月CPI今晚公布，美联储加息分歧待解
#韩股急跌后反弹收窄，半导体买盘能否持续？ Gold and Bitcoin had another dull day, moving sideways with no decent direction all day. Just at this time, the market started to press down again, which is a bit frustrating to watch.
There is a big event tonight—the CPI data release. I reviewed the report from CICC; the market expectations and current pricing are actually quite close, meaning tonight's data is unlikely to be too surprising. What the capital market fears most is never bad news, but uncertainty. Before the data is released, funds hold back and no one dares to move; once it lands, regardless of good or bad, the boot drops and the market will move accordingly. In fact, bad news is not that scary then.
From a trading perspective, a slight drop in advance might not be a bad thing. Panic selling comes out first, so the selling pressure when the data is released tonight will be smaller, releasing some pressure. The worry is if the market stubbornly holds during the day and then a big bearish candle crashes down right after the data release—that would be painful.
One thing to be cautious about: altcoins are weakening again. Bitcoin and gold are just sideways, but altcoins have already dropped, indicating funds are shrinking into core assets and risk appetite is cooling. At times like this, don't rush to buy altcoins; wait to see what the CPI says tonight, confirm the direction before acting, and keep some bullets in hand—it’s always more comfortable than being fully exposed and taking hits.
#九月CPI今晚公布，美联储加息分歧待解 $BTC's current market situation is very similar to that of 2022; it feels like the low point should be around March next year STRK’S RALLY HAS A CALENDAR PROBLEM. ⏳
$STRK gained 214% in 30 days. Now it’s down roughly 16% in 24 hours.
Tomorrow, Oct. 15, another 127 MILLION STRK unlock:
🔹 66.61M for early contributors
🔹 60.39M for investors
That’s approximately 1.3% of total supply becoming unlocked—not 127M tokens automatically sold.
The rally was spectacular. The next test is whether demand absorbs potential new supply.
#STRK #Starknet #TokenUnlock #DailyOrbit Sideways for three days waiting for CPI, what I see is the bears closing the net
BTC has been sideways at 83400 for a whole day, with volatility narrowing. The comment section is again shouting "Can't fall anymore, bad news is fully priced in, it will rally directly."
This kind of low-volume sideways movement is never a bottom; it's a buildup before a trend change, and tonight the direction is most likely down.
At 8:30, CPI is expected year-on-year at 3.6%-3.7%, up from the previous 3.4%, and month-on-month 0.6%, the largest in five months. The key is not how bad the data is, but that the bulls have already priced in "bad news fully priced, rate cuts coming" — the price is sideways, priced for easing expectations. Once the data lands, with 3.7% inflation in front of us and October rate cuts falling through, the mismatch between expectations and reality means even meeting expectations is bad news, let alone exceeding them.
$BTC
Above 83400, between 84800 and 85600 lies the trapped positions from recent failed rallies, so rebounds are all resistance; breaking below 82200 will sweep the stop-loss orders accumulated over three days of sideways movement, and 80000 is just the first stop. The longer the sideways, the deeper the fall.
$ETH
2500 is even weaker, unable to produce a decent rebound. Once BTC breaks down, ETH will first look at 2450, then 2400; don't hold onto illusions.
My thinking is clear: don't chase shorts before the data, wait for the bulls' last counterattack after the data lands, pushing to resistance levels — that is the comfortable entry point for shorts.
The rate cut story has been told for a month; tonight let the data speak.
The above is only market observation and does not constitute trading advice September CPI will be released tonight at 8:30. Oil prices are stuck around $100, and the overall CPI is basically expected to rise, with the market anticipating about 3.7%. The real focus is on the core CPI—if it can't be contained, a rate hike in December is inevitable. The 10-year US Treasury yield is at 5.2%, so money just sitting there earns that yield; not many are willing to take risks in the crypto space.
BTC is currently at 84,000, hovering around this level for the past couple of days. My judgment is that once the data comes out, it will first drop a bit. The 82,000 area is the first support level to catch it; if it dips and recovers, it's fine, but if it can't hold, it will need to find support lower down.
Reduce positions before the data release; the drop will actually be a good entry point, so don't follow the crowd out.
$BTC#闪迪美光下跌，长鑫技术进展受关注
US storage chip and data storage stocks continued to decline, with the market reassessing competition in China, but Changxin's R&D progress does not yet equate to mass production or market share changes. Reuters reported on October 13 in the US Eastern morning session that Micron fell about 4.5%, SanDisk about 4.3%; these are intraday figures, not closing prices. Changxin stated that the fifth-generation DRAM platform began mass production in September; additionally, according to media citing officials, progress has been made on the higher-density 4F² architecture, while server DDR5 products are still in planning. Micron mainly focuses on DRAM, SanDisk primarily on NAND flash, so the competitive impact paths differ; the simultaneous decline may also reflect semiconductor valuation and AI spending concerns. Subsequent observations will focus on Changxin's product yield, shipment volume, customer validation, and how Micron and SanDisk's financial reports explain pricing and demand.
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice.Price is falling, but the bulls haven't left yet.
What has changed? ETH quickly dropped from 2,507 to 2,481 in the past hour, a decline of 1.07%, with a significant increase in trading volume. However, the proportion of long positions on the contract side remains as high as 73.5%, and the funding rate stays positive at 0.0031%, meaning the bulls are still paying to hold their positions.
Why is this worth noting? The price is declining, but the crowding of long positions hasn't decreased. In the past 24 hours, ETH long liquidations totaled 10.45 million, and short liquidations totaled 10.13 million, almost balanced. Meanwhile, whales are offloading — an institution liquidated 52,000 ETH at an average price of 2,632, profiting 24.49 million; another OG address just deposited 6,369 ETH to Kraken.
Which observation is more supported? It supports the coexistence of "crowded longs and spot selling pressure." But ETH spot ETFs saw a net inflow of 24.83 million yesterday, ending 10 consecutive days of net outflows, with Grayscale Mini ETH alone accounting for 16.72 million. ETFs are receiving inflows, whales are selling, and bulls with leverage haven't left.
Below 2,388 there is a 946 million long liquidation zone, above 2,636 there is a 1.047 billion short liquidation zone. Spot is receiving, whales are running, bulls are holding — with tonight's CPI release, which side will move first? $ETH Price is falling, yet shorts continue to pay.
What has changed? BTC dropped from 83,449 to 83,133 in the past hour, breaking below the Bollinger lower band at 83,148, currently testing support at 83,100. However, the funding rate has fallen to -0.0029%, meaning shorts are still paying to hold their positions.
Why is this noteworthy? The price is declining, but the funding rate is negative, indicating shorts are actively increasing their positions during the drop. In the past 24 hours, short liquidations totaled 11.15 million, exceeding long liquidations of 8.36 million. Contract open interest rose 11.14% in 24 hours to 61.75 billion, with leverage rapidly rebuilding.
Which observation does this support more? It supports the "long-short standoff amid intensified short crowding" scenario. Spot ETFs saw a net inflow of 176 million yesterday, with FBTC alone accounting for 103 million, indicating spot funds are stepping in. Shorts increasing positions and ETF inflows form a standoff, both sides awaiting tonight's CPI.
CPI expectations rose year-over-year to 3.6%. 83,300 is the watershed level; a break below would test 82,500. Shorts are adding positions, ETFs are absorbing, and at the moment CPI is released—who will break first? $BTC The real place worth watching is where the drops differ. Even though the market is all green, why do some coins "rise first then fall," while others "just keep falling"? When I was watching the order books of WLD and FIL yesterday, I actually felt a bit chilled inside. Not the kind of panic chill, but the kind of "oh, so this is how the chips are changing hands" chill. WLD dropped 9.88% yesterday and then fell another 3.21% today, with the direction completely consistent over two days. FIL, on the other hand, rose 3.27% yesterday and only gave back 3.88% today, almost standing still over two days, just tracing an arc of rising then falling. Here's a detail many overlook: the drop percentages are calculated separately by day. So FIL looks like it "also fell today," but it actually didn't bleed continuously; it was first pushed up, then brought down. WLD, however, truly fell two days in a row, with a very unified directional sense. So what exactly is the market trading? I think it's trading "who's in a hurry to leave." Both WLD and FIL have trading volumes still above 100M, indicating chips are indeed changing hands, with some selling and some buying. But TRUMP only fell 1.35% today, with volume at just 65M — it fell less not because someone was rushing to buy, but because no one was in a hurry to move at all. A drop on shrinking volume and a drop on expanding volume reflect completely different emotional temperatures behind them. From the perspective of capital preference, this looks more like a phase of divergence rather than a start or continuation. The varieties with volume-driven consecutive drops indicate sellers still have strength; those with shrinking volume and slight drops might instead be temporarily forgotten. What really needs to be warned about is⚖️ Boss Eleven VS Brother Maji, a comparison of two top-level trading strategies.
Boss Eleven: High-frequency swing trading, quick in and out. Nearly 30-day win rate of 78%, total return +531%. Both BTC and ETH are fully long with 50x leverage, decisively stop loss and exit when wrong (BTC lost 27,000U, ETH lost 12,000U), never holding losing positions. $BTC
Brother Maji: Heavy position hedging (BTC short + ETH long), long-term holding with strong endurance, betting on market divergence, often accompanied by huge floating losses and volatility.
Neither model is absolutely good or bad: the former emphasizes risk control and turnover, the latter bets on trend and patience. Ordinary traders should never blindly copy high leverage! $ETH
#BTC财库优先股融资升温 #台积电Q3营收创新高，盈利表现待揭晓 Suddenly understand why Warren Buffett only holds short-term Treasury bonds.
The 20-year US Treasury yield reaching 6% could trigger a sell-off equivalent to $110 billion.
Right now it's at 5.68%.
A difference of 0.32 percentage points.
The key is not the yield, but the futures.
Futures can choose which bond to deliver.
When yields rise, the 20-year bond immediately becomes the cheapest.
So hedging institutions start selling to lock in exposure.
When more people sell, prices fall.
Prices fall, yields rise even more.
More people sell.
This is not a one-time sell-off, but a self-reinforcing loop.
Yesterday at the supermarket, I saw an AI shopping assistant say "Welcome" three times, but later realized it wasn’t calling me. Some signals are like that — they seem to be calling you, but are actually aimed at others.
Why not focus on the 10-year?
Because the 20-year is more sensitive. If interest rates rise by 1%, it falls more, so it breaks first.
Stocks are pressured in two ways:
Treasuries give you 5%+ risk-free;
Corporate borrowing becomes more expensive. The expensive batch of tech stocks can’t hold up first.
There’s an even earlier signal.
When the 10-year hits 5.9%, fund managers will give up on stocks. It’s currently at 5.22%.
This number is more important to watch than 6%, because it’s not theoretical, it’s behavioral.
But I want to say something contrary.
Neither of these numbers is a death line.
Interest rates are still on the way up, prices can fall first.
The most dangerous thing is not rates hitting 6%, but everyone still waiting for 6%.