Orbit Post Sitemap
$TRUMP is a low-circulation bet that no one is taking, hovering around $1.83, down 11% in seven days, with a market cap of 5.1 billion, down 97% from its ATH of 73. The most critical issue with this coin is its token distribution.
Circulating supply is 282 million, total supply 1 billion, only 28% unlocked, with the remaining 72% held internally and by the team. The contract is on Solana, a typical low-circulation, high FDV setup.
20% is truly circulating in the market, 80% is internal tokens. This structure means any price pump is just paving the way for internal selling, and all the buyers are retail investors. Without new catalysts, it purely relies on political meme sentiment to hold.
1.83 is the 24-hour low and also support; if broken, look for 1.74; above, 1.88 is the intraday high. RSI is 37.5, weak but not extreme. Low price doesn’t mean cheap; FDV still has nearly $19 billion hanging overhead.
Internal unlocking is long-term selling pressure; don’t be fooled by "it’s dropped too much". Low circulation doesn’t mean cheap; it’s a withdrawal code prepared for insiders. $MRNA Recently, I've been pondering a question: Will Moderna in Shanghai experience a "Tesla moment" for the pharmaceutical industry? When Tesla moved its factory to Shanghai back then, many probably didn't expect that it wasn't just Tesla itself who was ultimately changed. A factory came in, suppliers followed, talent followed, processes were brought in, local companies began benchmarking, and eventually the entire industry chain was reinforced. Moderna is actually somewhat similar. In 2023, Moderna began construction of China's first production base in Shanghai, with a project investment of about 3.6 billion yuan. According to the plans disclosed at the time, this place would not only produce vaccines but also involve R&D and personalized new antigen products. (Perceiving Shanghai) At that time, mRNA had not truly emerged domestically. But looking back now, things have already started to change. In August this year, Moderna and Merck announced Phase III results for INTerpath-001. This is the first time personalized mRNA tumor therapy has received a positive Phase III result. It's not a vaccine made to sell to everyone, but a vaccine designed for each patient based on mutations in their tumor. (Moderna News) This is where the real interest lies. If this product enters China in the future, it may bring more than just Moderna selling a few more drugs. Behind it lies a whole system: sequencing. Tumor samples. Antigen screening. mRNA design. Original📊4-Hour Brief｜SOL Leveraged Longs Liquidated, OKB Tests Neckline Support
$SOL｜-5.9% Current Price 109, as expected reaching lower boundary at 110
Funding rate annualized at -7%, leveraged longs basically cleared, selling pressure comes from spot and stop-losses, downside fuel weakens.
4-hour moving averages bearish, EMA50 resistance at 114, October gains mostly retraced.
Support at 105/100, resistance 114-116, upgraded bullish news already priced in, purely tracking market beta.
7-day range 100-114; if BTC breaks 80,000 then test 100-102.
Intraday 107-112, stop loss 105.5. Strategy: reduce positions at 114 on rebound, do not chase shorts.
$OKB｜-5.45% Current Price 124.3, yesterday predicted break below 128 targeting 124 realized
Sector shows resilience, 7d +3.43%, 30d +11.68%, fundamentals plus buyback and burn support.
124 is September breakout neckline, holding it means continuation of uptrend; resistance 130-132, previous high 138.
If BTC stays above 80,000, stabilization may push to 130-132; break below 121 targets 115.
Intraday 123-128, stop loss 121. Strategy: prioritize buying dips, relatively strong.$ZEC ZEC is currently exhibiting a classic "first dip to 1200" followed by a volume-reduced consolidation pattern. Influenced by the overall market pullback (BTC falling from 83499 to 82984), ZEC triggered concentrated profit-taking by previous short sellers after touching the 1200.55 integer level, passively pushing the price up to around 1221.
From a technical perspective, the MA5, MA10, and MA20 are tightly converged in the 1217-1224 range, and the volume during the rebound is extremely thin (only 7.84k), indicating a lack of incremental capital entering the market. This rally is essentially a "dead cat bounce" and a brief emotional repair, not a trend reversal.
In the vacuum period of the bulls and bears struggle, 1200 becomes a short-term key anchor point. If the overall market fails to break out with volume, as short-term buying power wanes, ZEC is very likely to end the emotional repair and test 1200 or even lower again. Currently, it is a quiet period before a market shift, and the future direction still depends on the guidance of the overall market volume.A strong rebound does not mean the bearish trend has ended; floating profits shrinking also does not mean you must close your position immediately. @欧哥 The clearest stance here is: do not move the existing short positions for now, but also don't rush to add more, and definitely don't flip to long just because of a period of price increase. What he is waiting for is not the account numbers looking better again, but clear trend evidence from the market.
First, look at $BTC. He is discussing the price movement from around 80,000 rebounding to about 83,500. After the initial drop, the price has recovered a significant portion of the decline, naturally putting a lot of pressure on short holders. But in his framework, judging a reversal is not just about how much the price has risen, but also about who is driving this move and whether the original entry logic has been overturned.
His daily short position basis remains the expectation of a pullback after a top divergence, not just a small drop on the one-hour or four-hour chart. He repeatedly emphasizes that short-term trading and daily trend trading, although both may be called "shorting," are targeting different market moves. If the plan at entry was to profit from the first leg, then choosing to exit upon a rebound is not wrong; if the plan was to wait for a larger-scale pullback, then you cannot replace the original decision criteria with small-scale fluctuations temporarily.
This is not a "hold to make money" statement. 欧哥 states the cost upfront: he has accepted that these short positions may return to near break-even or even ultimately incur losses. He is willing to bear this risk in exchange for the potential space of a larger pullback, but this is his choice and does not mean everyone should endure the same drawdown. Those who have not thought through the risks in advance are most likely to suffer when profits shrink.I've read the JPMorgan report twice, and what I really want to say isn't about SpaceX.
It's about Verizon, T-Mobile, and AT&T — the three companies that have been making easy money, but now someone might come knocking.
But note, the report itself adds: the short-term threat is limited.
In other words, the story is being told, but the real fight is still far off.
What I'm watching isn't telecom stocks, but the signal behind this.
The spectrum SpaceX holds is basically a ticket to enter wireless communication. If they really get involved, it just means one more player sharing the pie.
Going from three to four players, a price war is bound to come up sooner or later.
But what does this have to do with crypto?
Not much, so don't force the connection.
If anything, this narrative of a “new player entering to shake things up” has been playing out in every circle lately.
What’s really worth watching is whether SpaceX will actually step in or just hold the spectrum as leverage.
Right now, I'm leaning towards waiting and seeing.
This kind of news has more emotional value than actual value.
I've chased these “giants disrupting the industry” stories before, only to find out it was my positions getting disrupted.
#SpaceX拟购频谱拓展移动通信 $AT SOL at $110, are you going to buy the dip?
On-chain active addresses surged to 1.88 million, a 13-month high, stablecoin supply broke through $15 billion — yet the price dropped from 123 to 110 in a week, and ETFs still saw a net outflow of $22 million. The price is falling, but the chain is bustling. Is this a golden pit where the main players are quietly accumulating, or a trap where institutions are offloading amid the hype?
Let's look at the surface: SOL perpetual contracts on Binance are around $110, down 2%-4% in 24 hours, daily range 105.7-112.8. Market cap is $65 billion, ranked 7th, contract open interest around 900 million, long-short ratio 1.8, funding rate near zero. Major public chains are retracing, not a small coin crash.
But the candlestick tells you one thing: from the October 2 high of 123.8, it dropped about 12%, price stuck 7% below the 20-day moving average, daily RSI 36-47 — neutral to weak, not yet extremely oversold. 110 is not a new starting point, but a midpoint after losing 120.
First: The busier the chain, the more the price falls — this is not a contradiction, it's a signal.
On October 9, unique active addresses were about 1.88 million, a 13-month high. Network growth has doubled since early September. Stablecoin supply exceeds $15 billion, spot DEX daily volume is $2.2 billion, fees over $10 million a day.
Price is falling, but the chain is still busy.
What you see is "strong fundamentals, price oversold." Here's another interpretation: on-chain heat is the afterglow of the previous rally, not the engine for the next one.
New highs in active addresses don't mean new money is coming to buy the dip — it could just be old players frequently rotating, farming volume, airdrop hunters running. What really matters is not who is using the chain, but who is buying the coin.
The painful truth: ETFs are running. In early October, the US spot SOL ETF had a net outflow of about $22 million, giving back all the inflows from September. Fidelity's FSOL application is still in progress, but that's a future story, not this week's buying.
Second: Institutions are active, but money isn't coming in.
Jump Crypto staked another 4.54 million SOL via Firedancer wallet, worth about $50 million, client deployment is increasing. Securitize launched tokenized stocks of Apple, Nvidia, Tesla on Solana.
Sounds impressive? Staking is not buying. Staking locks up existing coins to earn interest, not scooping from the market. Institutions are "building," but not "buying" — these are two different things.
More intense: September's cumulative DEX volume exceeded $3 trillion, but TVL shrank with the coin price. Stablecoin supply didn't retreat, meaning USD capital hasn't fled, but SOL-denominated assets are shrinking — in plain terms: the coin price dropped, on-chain asset nominal value dropped, but people remain.
This is not a crash, it's a slow, boiling-frog style deleveraging.
Third: Macro is unsupportive, SOL is the top victim of high beta.
Bitcoin fell from $86,000+ in early October to $82,000-$83,000, dominance rising to 59%-60%. The Fed raised rates to 3.75%-4.00% in September, minutes hawkish, rate cuts far off.
Fear & Greed Index at 59 — still greedy, not surrendering.
What does this mean? The bottom hasn't arrived. The real bottom is when the fear index drops to 10-20, the whole network curses, communities go silent, no one talks coins. Now is a pullback in the greed zone, the main players still have room to sell.
On October 8, SOL dropped from 117 to 108, following BTC's deleveraging rhythm. SOL is a high-beta chain: BTC down 1%, SOL down 3%; BTC sideways, SOL slowly declines. This is not trash, it's its DNA.
Long-short showdown, judge for yourself:
On one side:
Active addresses at 1.88 million, a 13-month high, real on-chain activity
Stablecoin supply over $15 billion, USD capital hasn't left the chain
Jump staked 4.54 million, Firedancer progressing
Tokenized stocks launched, RWA narrative accelerating
Down 62% from ATH 293, valuation extremely compressed
On the other side:
ETF net outflow $22 million, institutional funds withdrawing
Fed hawkish, rates at 3.75%-4.00%
BTC dominance rising, altcoins bleeding
Fear & Greed 59 still greedy, no surrender yet
Technical bearish alignment, 110 is just a pause
Key level 110, life-and-death line at 105.7.
Strong support: 105.7 (today's low) → break to 100 → then 95.8 (30-day low)
Current zone: 109-111 (the 110 you see is a rebound pause, not confirmed buying)
Near resistance: 112.5-113 (today's high, failure to reclaim means continuation down)
Strong resistance: 116-120 (October 7-8 break zone + 20-day MA 118)
Without volume to reclaim 120, all rebounds are just corrections, not reversals.
Trading strategy
Short-term long:
Wait for 106-107 pullback to hold, then 1-hour reclaim above 109.5 before entering. Stop loss below 104.8, first target 112.5, second 116. Entering at 110 now? 112.5 above is a wall, risk-reward not enough.
Breakout long:
4-hour volume breakout closing above 113.5, then target 117-120. Stop loss below 109. No volume fake breakout, no follow.
Short-term short:
Light short on resistance 112.5-114 with weak volume, stop loss above 115.5, target 107/106. 110 already away from today's low, not suitable to chase short.
Swing:
Mid-term logic is active addresses, stablecoins, Firedancer. But ETFs still outflowing. More comfortable position is volume contraction and stabilization at 106, or daily close reclaiming 120. If 105.7 daily breaks, mid-term bulls pause, wait for 100 or even 96 to reassess.
Only if ETF net inflow resumes + price stabilizes above 116, can this retracement be considered a pre-main rally consolidation.
SOL now is like ETH in early 2024 —
ETF approved, institutions bought, price dropped. Everyone called it "trash," then doubled months later.
But one difference: ETH's fear index was already down to 20 then, SOL is still at 59 now.
The busier the chain, the more the price falls. You think it's oversold, but actually the main players are rotating.
$BTC $ETH $SOL Coming back just to become a big loser again, no one else like this!
AguilaTrades, this guy, was silent for 14 months and just returned, but in only two days, his $700,000 principal was directly reduced to $150,000, shrinking by nearly 80%! This is not a comeback, it's basically warming up the market makers!
Watching this operation is really suffocating: yesterday he went long and lost $300,000, probably got anxious, then immediately went short, but $BTC rebounded past 83,000, and the short position was forcibly stopped out at a low point, losing another $250,000. Getting beaten twice in one day, he’s done for. Adding previous losses, the total loss has reached $38,160,000!
Honestly, isn’t this exactly the same as us retail traders getting emotional? Watching his moves, I think the biggest problem is rusty hands combined with eagerness to recover losses. After not trading for 14 months, he immediately tried to make a big move, but lost on the first trade and wasn’t satisfied, immediately reversed, completely led by market emotions, a typical case of chasing highs and selling lows.Brothers, today let's talk about APT, BTC, and ETH. Putting these three together is like comparing three different worlds.
First, $APT is really hopeless. The daily chart shows a standard descending channel, and every rebound is just an escape opportunity, not a chance to get on board. The worst part is that on October 12, 11.31 million APT will be unlocked, worth about $57 million, accounting for 1.9% of the current circulating supply. Meanwhile, the ecosystem TVL has shrunk by more than half from its peak, and on-chain active addresses are also dropping. Supply is increasing while demand is decreasing; without structural improvement, any rebound is empty.
Next, $BTC has been consolidating around 85,000 for a week, with a sell wall at 87,000 above and a bottom line at 82,500 below. On-chain signals are positive—whales have been continuously withdrawing coins from exchanges since the end of August. Binance's BTC reserves have dropped by nearly 40,000 coins, marking the largest weekly outflow since June 2023. The price hasn't risen, but chips are moving to cold wallets; this structure is very similar to early this year.
$ETH is the most awkward. Staked volume has surpassed 43 million coins, circulating supply is tightening, and it's stuck in a tug-of-war around 2,680, unable to break through 2,700. The ETH/BTC rate is still grinding at 0.032 with no independent trend. But conversely, once ETF funds flow back, ETH's elasticity will be much greater than BTC's.
A few words: the current market is BTC holding the stage, ETH waiting for the wind, and APT self-sabotaging.
$APT $BTC $ETH Brief Analysis of the Reasons Behind ZEC/USDT's Rise
The recent strength of ZEC/USDT is driven by the combined forces of “Privacy Coin Narrative Revival + Institutional Access Opening + Technical Upgrade Expectations + Contract Short Squeeze.”
First, after the launch of the US's first Zcash spot ETF (Grayscale ZCSH), traditional funds can allocate $ZEC through securities accounts, significantly boosting buy-side expectations; subsequently, Winklevoss submitted an application for a spot Zcash ETF, further expanding the imagination space for “regulatory compliance.”
Second, the resurgence of privacy demand. Against the backdrop of enhanced on-chain monitoring and increased attention to financial privacy in the AI era, Zcash’s “optional privacy + zk-SNARK” model is more easily accepted by institutions than mandatory anonymity coins, leading funds to flow from large-cap coins to the privacy sector.
Third, the anticipation of the NU7 network upgrade boosts sentiment: the target block time will be reduced from 75 seconds to 25 seconds, improving transaction experience and providing technical narratives for bulls.
Finally, ZEC’s circulating supply is not large; after breaking key price levels, short sellers’ stop losses, forced liquidations, and chasing funds create positive feedback, accelerating the price increase.
In short: the rise of ZEC/USDT is not driven by a single news event but by the combined push of “ETF gateway + privacy narrative + upgrade expectations + leveraged short squeeze.” The short-term gains are substantial, but the risk of pullback is equally high. ETH really needs to be cleared out, going back and forth is really pointless!
Brothers, staying up late watching the market, I’m honestly worn out by Ethereum. $BCH and $SOL are charging wildly ahead, while it just hovers around the entry price, wearing me down.
Position update:
$BCH: A true war god! Full position 10X, entry at 261.02, marked at 316.35, unrealized profit +82.82U, ROI as high as +174.90%! Base position 473U, impressively solid.
SOL: Steady as an old dog! Full position 20X, entry at 115.63, marked at 121.81, unrealized profit +81.69U, ROI +101.47%. Yield over 100%, still the anchor of the account. $SOL
$ETH: Full position 5X, entry at 2718.24, marked at 2719.55, unrealized profit +0.94U (+0.21%). This thing is like a dead fish, it can’t rise, it can’t fall.
Logic tells me: just clear ETH quickly! No loss, no gain anyway, better to withdraw the margin and add to BCH and SOL, or just cash out and have a good meal.
#9月FOMC纪要公布，多数官员倾向再加息
#BTC现货ETF创近三个半月最大单日净流出
#跟着OKX打卡2049 How to interpret the largest single-day net outflow in nearly three and a half months for $BTC spot ETF
#BTC现货ETF创近三个半月最大单日净流出
A large outflow ≠ trend reversal, but we need to watch if there are continuous outflows over the next 2–3 trading days.
If outflows continue + BTC fails to hold 80,000–81,000: institutional demand weakens, looking down to around 76,000.
If it quickly returns to net inflow: it’s more like profit-taking or quarterly rebalancing triggered by macro disturbances.
Ethereum spot ETF has also seen consecutive days of outflows, indicating this is not a BTC-only issue but a broader deleveraging/reduction of exposure in crypto risk assets.
What to watch in trading
Daily net flows of spot BTC ETF (SoSoValue / Farside)
BTC’s breakthrough/failure to hold 80,000 and 87,000
10Y US Treasury yield, DXY, crude oil
Whether perpetual funding rates + long liquidations continue
Whether IBIT continues outflows (it was previously the "only support") $ETH $ZEC
#9月FOMC纪要公布，多数官员倾向再加息
#霍尔木兹通航降至两月低位，油价跳涨4% $STRK's bottom support in this wave is clearly stronger, with funds frantically accumulating around 0.06, volume and price rising together, and the center of gravity steadily moving upward. Now it has pulled up to a high of 0.07366, short-term profit-taking is starting to emerge, and high-level oscillations may see a pullback at any time.
I entered long at 50x leverage at 0.06061, now marking 0.07366, with an unrealized profit of 1076.55%. Tenfold profits look great, but 50x leverage at high levels is extremely fragile, and a single sharp drop can cause a very rapid retracement.
To my brothers, lock in profits and take them off the table first with large positions, keep a base position to watch the 0.07366 support; if it breaks, reduce positions, and if it returns to the opening price of 0.06061, exit all. Don’t be greedy for the tail; only what you take out counts as money. $ETH $ZEC #BTC现货ETF创近三个半月最大单日净流出 #Winklevoss旗下机构申请ZEC现货ETF $ZEC
The second ZEC ETF is here, with the applicant being the exchange owner.
▪️ Winklevoss Asset Services submitted an S-1 registration statement to the SEC on 10/6
▪️ Plans to list on Nasdaq, ticker WINK, fee rate 0.25%
▪️ If approved, it will be the second spot Zcash ETF in the US
▪️ The applicant is an affiliated entity of the two Gemini founders, both the applicant and a former trading venue
▪️ Grayscale's previous ZEC trust is also seeking to convert into a spot ETF
▪️ ZEC on 10/8 was about 1,246, down 14.5% in the past 7 days, up 809.5% in the past year
The disagreement is not about approval but whether privacy coins can pass compliance — ETFs require transparent holdings, which is exactly the opposite direction of ZEC.
ETF custody, auditing, and daily disclosures must show visible addresses; ZEC's default shielded transactions are precisely invisible. The compromise is to only include transparent addresses, at the cost of losing ZEC's true use case.
Direction to watch — first see if the SEC issues an inquiry; if privacy features are questioned, the process will be delayed.Offline event situations of various exchanges during Token 2049:
Binance: Rented a church venue for the event, multiple BSC project teams participated, He Yi did not attend due to pregnancy, CZ also absent, co-CEO Deng was present.
OKX: Held a full-day large-scale event on the 6th, with a large number of attendees, Vitalik appeared on site; supported by a VIP dinner, Xu Mingxing attended and took photos with guests; as an F1 sponsor, invited guests to watch the F1 race.
Gate: F1 race sponsor, invited guests to watch on site, arranged photo sessions with racers, organized a dinner, and held a product launch conference concurrently.
Bitget: Only arranged a Chinese-style dinner, no other supporting activities.
Kraken: Held a dinner, but almost no Chinese KOLs released related on-site photos.
HTX: Arranged yacht activities + VIP dinner, Brother Sun was present, many guests took photos with him; during the main venue, Brother Sun went on the innovation stage for interaction, with a relatively large number of attendees.
hyperliquid: Held events, founder Jeff was present, mostly overseas participants.
In terms of overall event grandeur, the top three in this event are OKX, Gate, and HTX.There is something very interesting: actually, during the big surge in August, many large option holders (sellers) got trapped and rolled their positions into the following months. If the bulls fail to keep pushing now, a sharp drop is quite possible, which would be a real crash. However, it probably doesn't have enough momentum to fall that low. $BTC Are we overlooking a bigger macro logic?🤯
Although BTC ETF saw a net outflow of about $484 million and the price is testing the key support level of $82,500, the reduction in corporate treasury holdings and the increase in the proportion of long-term illiquid BTC may be quietly changing the market's supply and demand structure.
📉 Short-term panic does not mean the long-term trend has reversed.
Is this just a shakeout, or is a potential BTC supply shock brewing?
Will you choose to panic sell or stay patient and wait for the market to give the answer?
#SepFOMCMinutesHikeWatch #BTCETFBiggestOutflow #OKXToken2049CheckIn $COW
CoW Protocol takes a distinctive approach to decentralized trading by using batch auctions and coincidence-of-wants matching to improve trade execution. Instead of treating every swap as an isolated transaction, its design can identify opportunities to match orders and reduce certain trading costs. The challenge is maintaining an advantage as DEX aggregators evolve. Actual execution quality and recurring trading demand matter more than the technical concept alone.Although my $ZEC is stuck in a loss, I’m not panicking because right now it’s a classic bull trap—it can’t break through and will have to drop further.
From the high of 1697, it has been smashed down to 1130, a 29% drop. This current rebound is a typical bull trap; it can’t break through and will have to fall again.
First, why the drop? Grayscale ZCSH had a net outflow of $93.56 million in a single week, with assets under management falling from the peak to about $751 million, indicating institutional withdrawal. The Middle East situation is escalating, oil prices have broken $100, U.S. Treasury yields hit a 24-year high, BTC fell below 81000, 124,000 liquidations occurred across the network, and the entire market is deleveraging. ZEC cannot remain unaffected.
Looking at the technicals: the daily chart has broken below the MA20 and the lower Bollinger Band, with moving averages in a bearish alignment confirming mid-term weakness. Resistance for the rebound is at 1250-1280, support at 1160-1100. The current price is just around MA20; if it can’t break above, it’s a short opportunity.
On the news front, the NU7 upgrade testnet was activated on October 4, but the mainnet won’t launch until November 5. There’s no new narrative in the short term to take over, so the positive news has turned into a negative. Funding rates are still positive, and bulls haven’t surrendered yet, indicating there’s still room for further squeeze.
My strategy: hold the short position with a stop loss above 1250. The first target is 1160; if it breaks, look to 1100. Set your stop loss well, take a bite and run—never repeat the mistake of stubbornly holding on before!
$BTC $ETH #9月FOMC纪要公布，多数官员倾向再加息 Wallet sellers stealing coins? $86 million vanished, Ledger takes action
Brothers, there's big news in the crypto world again. This time it's not an exchange hack, but a problem with a hardware wallet seller.
Ledger is officially investigating Southeast Asian distributor CryptoBilis: there are suspicions that the hardware wallets they sold were tampered with, so when users initialize them, their coins get transferred away. On-chain detective Specter estimates hundreds of wallets affected, including BTC, ETH, and Tron, with losses exceeding $86 million; another security researcher estimates $72 million, and the number is still rising.
Ledger has already instructed this distributor to suspend sales and shipments, and warns: if you bought a device from this channel in the past 90 days, do not initialize it yet; if you have already set up a wallet, quickly rebuild a new wallet with a new mnemonic phrase and transfer your assets there. As for whether the device itself has vulnerabilities or exactly how it was tampered with, the investigation is ongoing with no conclusion yet.
In plain terms: the hardware wallets themselves are not compromised, the problem lies with the sales channel. In the future, when buying such critical security devices, only buy through official channels and don’t be tempted by third parties offering cheaper prices.
Did you buy from the official website or a third party? Share your thoughts in the comments.
Risk warning: The market is highly volatile, manage your positions carefully. For reference only, not investment advice.
#Bitcoin #Ethereum #Security$SKL
SKALE is designed to support Ethereum-compatible application chains with an emphasis on reducing gas-fee friction for users. That can be particularly useful for gaming and applications that require frequent interactions. But low transaction costs are only one part of the adoption equation. Developers still need compelling products, and users need reasons to return. Ecosystem activity will determine whether the infrastructure achieves lasting relevance.The current market for Bitcoin appears to be a rebound, but in reality, it is a typical liquidity trap to lure longs. Multiple technical indicators resonate with warnings: a massive bearish waterfall could break through the defense line at any moment.
• 4H SMC structure has peaked: The 4-hour level has established a bearish nature change (CHoCH↓), with the high at 87,239 marked as strong resistance (Strong High). There is a huge bearish order block (OB) and fair value gap (FVG) pressure in the 85,500–86,500 area above, so the rebound is only a weak pullback to the imbalance zone.
• Multi-timeframe structure false boom: The large-scale absolute dominant trend is bearish across the board on 4H (-101% expansion zone) and 1H (BOS↓); the 5m and 15m short-term rebounds are only minor corrections in the downtrend, with the main force absorbing long counterparties during the pullback.
• Main force chip gap exposed: The chip control line (POC) is pressed at 85,551, with heavy trapped positions above. The chip volume near 83,060 is sharply shrinking; once the key low at 80,351 is broken, the downside will enter a chip vacuum zone, which is very likely to trigger a chain stampede of longs and a free-fall style crash.
Do not blindly bottom-fish during small-scale rebounds; below 85,500, every rally is a short position area. Breaking below 80,351 will officially start a large-scale unimpeded plunge.Last night in the night session, the phrase "Break 82500 to look at 80000" basically came true today with an intraday low of 80400. The close at 83052 reclaimed above 82500, so this round of judgment was correct, first acknowledgment. Talking about tonight, the funding rates are interesting. ETH funding rate is -0.0044%, SOL funding rate is -0.0027%, shorts are paying to hold positions; BTC funding rate is -0.0003%, basically neutral. The main short positions are concentrated on altcoins, BTC itself hasn't been heavily shorted. Open interest is 29,947 BTC (about $2.49 billion), leverage is not tight, not at a liquidation chain level. The bad news is on the spot side: US spot Bitcoin ETFs had net outflows for two consecutive days, $487 million on October 7 and $244 million on the 8th, with Fidelity's FBTC outflowing $197 million in one day. Institutions are reducing positions, this is real selling pressure. Outlook: Tonight, BTC 82500 is the watershed. If it holds and ETH funding rate turns positive, short covering could push it towards 84000 resistance; if it doesn't hold and ETFs continue outflows, 80400 will be tested again. Falsification condition: If BTC directly stands above 83500 tomorrow morning, tonight's judgment is void, indicating bulls' relay is stronger than I expected. Data: OKX 21:15 real-time snapshot. Which side are you betting on tonight, hold or break? Comment below.After a sharp liquidity sweep down to $12.18, $LINK is grinding back up on lower timeframes with tight price compression and drying sell volume.
➔ Waiting for a higher-low retest gives us a much cleaner Risk/Reward ratio!
📊 Long Setup
– Entry Zone: $12.50 – $12.60
– Stop Loss: $12.10
– Targets: $13.00 | $13.90
⚠️ Counter-trend scalp, respect your SL.The crypto market is undergoing a round of deleveraging. In the past 24 hours, the total network liquidation amount is about $1.19 billion:
🔹 ETH liquidations about $356 million
🔹 BTC liquidations about $298 million
Among them, long position liquidations exceed $1 billion.
Interestingly, ETH's market cap is less than one-fifth of BTC's, yet the liquidation amount is higher. Adjusted by market cap proportion, the liquidation impact on ETH is about 6 times that of BTC, indicating that the bullish leverage stacked on ETH is significantly heavier.
Concentrated forced liquidations can amplify short-term volatility, but a surge in liquidations does not necessarily mean the downtrend will continue.
Key points to watch next: whether ETH can firmly reclaim the 2500 level, and whether trading volume effectively follows during the rebound phase. $BTC $ETH #BTC现货ETF创近三个半月最大单日净流出 # September FOMC Minutes Released, Majority of Officials Favor Another Rate Hike The Federal Reserve's September FOMC meeting minutes show that all 19 policymakers supported a 25 basis point rate hike, raising the federal funds target range to 3.75%–4.00%. Most officials believe another rate hike before year-end may be appropriate, but the urgency for an October hike has decreased, with market pricing dropping to about 20%. In the short term, high interest rates continue to suppress risk assets; however, in the medium term, BTC's response to macro policy is undergoing a structural change. #### How Does a Rate Hike Affect BTC? - **Interest Rate Channel**: Rising risk-free yields increase the opportunity cost of holding BTC. - **Liquidity Channel**: Global M2 expansion typically leads BTC prices by about 2–3 months. - **Risk Appetite Channel**: BTC's correlation with U.S. stocks is increasing, often pulling back in sync when U.S. stocks face pressure. #### Key Change: From "Lagging Receiver" to "Forward Pricer" Research shows BTC's reaction on FOMC day is not significant, but the cumulative negative response over the following 10 trading days can reach about -2.60%, with volatility far exceeding that of the Nasdaq and S&P. More importantly, after the approval of spot BTC ETFs in 2024, institutional funds have deeply engaged. Binance Research data indicates BTC's correlation with the global central bank easing index has shifted from +0.21 before ETFs to -0.778 by 2026. This suggests institutions may position 6–12 months in advance, and BTC will **anticipate [Pharaoh's Market Watch]
Pharaoh straightforwardly says, SpaceX's acquisition of low-frequency spectrum clearly shows its intention to upgrade from a "satellite broadband provider" to a "mobile operator," directly competing with AT&T, Verizon, and T-Mobile.
First, let's look at the scale of the move. SpaceX announced the purchase of 800MHz low-frequency spectrum covering the entire U.S., with a maximum bandwidth of 14MHz, for about $8 billion. This spectrum has extremely strong penetration; most existing phones support this band, so users don't need to switch to specialized satellite phones. Elon Musk personally posted that this is "highly significant."
What does this mean for BTC?
In the short term, this is another reinforcement of the AI infrastructure narrative. SpaceX acquiring spectrum and building a direct-to-phone network essentially packages "space computing power + satellite communication" into a larger infrastructure platform. Starlink is already SpaceX's only profitable business, and now it’s entering the trillion-dollar mobile communication market, thickening the entire AI + space infrastructure chain. As a risk asset, BTC can ride the wave of tech sector sentiment.
But Pharaoh must remind you not to treat SpaceX's move as a driver for BTC. BTC is still struggling around 80,000, with resistance at 84,500 and short-term support at 82,000. SpaceX's spectrum acquisition won't pull much liquidity from BTC in the short term, nor will it directly cause a takeoff. $BTC $ETH $ZEC #SpaceX拟购频谱拓展移动通信 $ETH I added some position in Ethereum, now Ethereum is very weak, 2500 can't hold at all
From yesterday's 2400 it rebounded all the way to around 2510, I feel it should pull back, this strong rebound has been rising all the way
Now it is blocked near 2500, the bears will definitely take the opportunity to smash the market again, not looking too far ahead for this wave, too many unknowns over the weekend
I plan to exit around 2450, this is yesterday's strong support line, the spike just reached 2400
$BTC Bitcoin actually rebounded to 83500, this position is very strong, it should be a signal of stopping the fall, after one more pullback I will close my position
The lower range 81500-82000 should be the pullback point of this rebound, Bitcoin is very strong now, it probably won't continue to smash the market
It is very likely to move sideways, the possibility of a V-shaped bottom rebound also exists, but currently there is no news to pull it back to around 85k in one step $ETHFI
Liquid restaking has introduced another layer of complexity to Ethereum’s staking economy. Ether.fi combines liquid staking with additional restaking-related services, giving users more ways to deploy capital. However, extra yield opportunities can also introduce additional dependencies and risks. ETHFI’s long-term relevance depends on whether users find these services genuinely valuable without overlooking smart-contract, slashing, and liquidity risks$POLS
Polkastarter operates in the token-launch and fundraising segment of Web3, connecting early-stage projects with potential communities and participants. This model can provide access to emerging ideas, but it is also highly sensitive to market cycles. When speculative capital retreats, fundraising becomes harder. The meaningful measure of success is whether supported projects deliver useful products and retain users after their initial token launches.$SOL shorted from 117.62 down to 109.98, with a floating profit of 649%. Using 100x leverage basically captured the full drop in this segment. But such a deep short-term drop has pushed the deviation rate to the limit, and a violent rebound triggered by short covering could happen at any time.
There is buying support starting at the low end of the order book, and profit-taking positions are piled up heavily below. With 100x leverage, a sudden spike can cause liquidation in a second, and profit drawdown can be faster than a waterfall.
The logic has been fulfilled, so no greed. About 80% was closed at market price and withdrawn, with the base position set at 110 to break even on stop loss. Pocket the profits and buy a cup of milk tea to enjoy; money in hand is truly sweet. $ZEC $ETH #BTC现货ETF创近三个半月最大单日净流出 On October 7, the U.S. spot $BTC ETF saw a single-day net outflow of $484.9 million, marking the largest record since June 25. BlackRock's IBIT led with an outflow of $207.7 million, followed by Fidelity's FBTC and ARKB with outflows of $105.1 million and $101.7 million respectively. This outflow erased the cumulative net inflow of $321.6 million from the first four trading days of October, turning the month into a net outflow of approximately $163 million.
The capital withdrawal coincided with the downward movement of BTC prices. Bitcoin fell for three consecutive days, once dropping to $80,427, a 17-day low. Outflows continued on October 8, with another $244.1 million withdrawn in a single day, totaling nearly $730 million over two days.
Previously, ETFs had seen net inflows for three consecutive weeks, accumulating $241.1 million, indicating a period of stable institutional allocation sentiment. A large single-day outflow does not necessarily indicate a long-term trend reversal, but attention is needed: outflows are concentrated in leading products and form a negative feedback loop with weakening prices. If BTC fails to stabilize, ETF redemption pressure may continue to suppress rebound momentum.
#BTC现货ETF创近三个半月最大单日净流出 Brothers, although I'm stuck in this wave of $ZEC, I'm really not panicking at all right now.
ZEC current price is 1216.69, basically flat in 24 hours. I opened a short at 1209.55, currently floating a loss of -0.71U, a return rate of -1.77%, painful but not critical.
Why am I not panicking now?
First, there is no momentum in the market, it can't be pulled up. After pulling back from 1208 to 1226, it got stuck at this position, neither up nor down, sideways for almost a day. The funding rate turned negative, indicating a huge number of shorts, but the price can't be pushed down, meaning someone is supporting the price.
Second, it keeps brushing up and down, so the loss isn't much. In this kind of sideways accumulation market, the worst thing is chasing highs and selling lows. It just oscillates within this range, both longs and shorts are easily stopped out, better to hold and wait for it to choose a direction on its own.
Third, ZEC is a kind of wild coin; the longer the sideways, the closer the breakout. The whales are waiting for a signal, NU7 upgrade lands on November 5, ETF funds are still flowing in and out, the sideways is just building strength.
Trading idea: Keep holding the short, no adding positions, no cutting losses, wait for it to move on its own. Resistance above is 1250-1300, support below is 1180-1150. In a sideways market, it's better not to act rashly. For a wild coin like ZEC, when the time comes, it will definitely come.
$BTC $ETH #9月FOMC纪要公布，多数官员倾向再加息 Looking at the big trader's position, I fell into deep thought, then laughed — it turns out I simply don't understand the big trader's strategy!
ETH 100x full position long, unrealized loss of 2033U, return rate -726%! BTC 100x full position long, unrealized loss of 257U, -122%! Together these two trades lost over two thousand dollars, so what? The maintenance margin ratio remains steady at 3311%! The liquidation price column shows “--”, meaning — liquidation? Impossible! Meanwhile, SOXL 10x full position short has an unrealized profit of 361U, return rate +87.32%! Long positions lose, short positions win, yet the overall account still holds steady!
I finally realized: what I lack is not skill, but capital and mindset! I enter with just a few U, and even tiny fluctuations scare me into watching the market overnight, repeatedly cutting losses, calculating liquidation prices daily, fearing liquidation to the point of sleeplessness. The big trader uses hundreds of U as margin, endures thousands of dollars in unrealized losses while chatting casually, even casually opening a short position to hedge.
Their liquidation line is far away, mine is right in front of me. They endure positions, I endure life.
So, rather than envy others who "can hold on," admit first that you "can't afford to lose." From today, lower leverage, control position size, survive first, then think about profits. When one day I can face hundreds of negative points in unrealized losses without flinching, then we can talk about what "realm" really means. #9月FOMC纪要公布，多数官员倾向再加息 #BTC现货ETF创近三个半月最大单日净流出 #跟着OKX打卡2049 $BTC $ETH $ZEC $BTC's current Bitcoin structure is basically forming an "M" head pattern. It is currently testing the neckline area of the M head, between 82800 and 83800. You can place short orders within this range, preferably near 83800, and observe. Set a stop loss around 84800; if it cannot break through, this structure is confirmed. For now, watch the support around 80000. The reason I didn't connect the point at 86912.75 is that I originally thought it would form an ascending triangle, but this was a trap set by the market makers. Now that it has broken down, this ascending triangle structure is invalid, so I didn't connect it.ETH dropped to 2,400, and a huge whale was liquidated for $69.69 million. Then he immediately opened a long position worth $196 million.
Not a stop loss, not waiting it out, but adding to the position.
After this whale was liquidated of 28,716 ETH, he added margin within half an hour and reopened a position. Now he holds 78,955 ETH longs, with a new liquidation price at 2,299.
In the same market, another whale is operating in the opposite direction.
One whale holds $320 million in longs across 10 addresses, 1,400 BTC plus 82,000 ETH, with average entry prices of 75,967 and 2,493, floating profits of $8.77 million. This year, he has already earned $116.7 million by going long on BTC and ETH.
But for Brother Maji, it's a different story.
A weekly loss of $8.44 million, ETH longs cut down to only 9,950 ETH, liquidation price at 2,431.59, just 3% away from the current ETH price of 2,503.
In the same crash, some added to positions after liquidation, some have floating profits of $8.77 million, and some have cut losses down to their last breath.
In the past 24 hours, the entire network saw $1.191 billion liquidated, longs accounted for $1.056 billion, and 192,000 people were liquidated.
The ETH 2,400-2,500 range is the long-short dividing line built by whales with real money. The one who was liquidated for $69.69 million and still dared to add to the position is not betting on a rebound, but that ETH will not fall below 2,300. Maji's liquidation price of 2,431 is near this line.
$BTC $ETH Tonight's Review｜46.3, Hawks Have Nothing to Say Tonight
Two data points came out, and the results are quite interesting.
University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment Preliminary is **46.3**, significantly below expectations (expected 47.8, previous 48.1), declining for the third consecutive month. Americans are losing confidence in the economy, with the low-income group’s confidence dropping the most.
But inflation expectations are rising again: 1 year at 4.7%, 5 years at 3.5%, continuing upward. Weak economy + strong inflation expectations — the Fed’s most troublesome combination.
Schmid remains consistently hawkish, just voted against a rate cut. But the market isn’t buying it tonight: once the data came out, the October no-rate-hike was fully priced in.
BTC’s reaction is the most honest: **83,032, up 1.57%, decisively breaking through 82,500**. This afternoon we said 82,500 is the weekly critical level; only by holding above it is it a true breakout — and tonight it held above. ETH at 2,492, up 0.68%, not falling behind.
In short: data leans dovish, hawks step aside, bulls can sleep well tonight. See you tomorrow morning on "Three Minutes Before the Market Open."
The above is personal record only and does not constitute investment advice.
$BTC $ETH
#9月FOMC纪要公布，多数官员倾向再加息 Wow, the market rebounded today, and a big player really can't sit still. According to monitoring, two addresses from the same giant whale dumped over $50.3 million to go long on $BTC and $ETH!
The most exciting is the address diamondbull.eth, which directly opened a long position of 11,500 ETH with 25x leverage! The position value is as high as $28.72 million, squeezing into the top seven ETH long holders. But it seems it hasn't hit big profits yet, currently floating at a loss of about $109,000. 25x leverage, guys, if there's even a slight pullback, the position will be in serious danger. Aren't they afraid of liquidation?
In contrast, the address samurai.eth providing the funds is much steadier. Long positions of 200 BTC and 2,000 ETH, with a total value of about $21.58 million, currently comfortably floating with a profit of $753,000.
This operation is very interesting: the same boss, one is crazily betting on an ETH rebound with 25x leverage, while the other is steadily holding spot longs on BTC and ETH. What big positive news did they sniff out in advance to be so eager to get in?$ARB is just one week away from the unlock on October 16, with 92.65 million tokens, worth about 19 million USD, set to be released. This selling pressure is an obvious event marked on the calendar.
Why is it dropping now?
The L2 narrative has already been taken over by Base, siphoning off traffic. ARB's own emissions are inherently a perpetual selling pressure, and now with another unlock added, it's only natural for holders to rush to sell.
What's even more awkward is that the coin price has dropped over 90% from its peak, with shallow liquidity, so even a small sell-off can create a deep pit.
I think the core contradiction for ARB this week isn't technical but supply-related — any rebound before the unlock is just an opportunity to reduce positions. Don't mistake this obvious event for the end of negative news.Writing
🔥 $ZEC: Is This Rebound a Bull Trap?
Honestly, this rebound looks suspicious!
ZEC climbed from $1,112 to $1,224, but there’s one important detail many traders may be overlooking: Open interest declined while the price was rising.
📊 What could this mean?
It may indicate that short sellers are closing positions and taking profits rather than fresh buyers aggressively entering the market. If short covering is the main driver, the rebound may struggle to sustain its momentum.
#DailyOrbit As usual, a quick look at the balance before bed～👀
BTC current price is 83070, 24-hour high 83530. I've been watching the OKX order book; this wave bounced up from 80400, rising over 2600, finally venting some of the frustration from last night. It touched 83530 but didn't hold, falling back to 83070, indicating heavy selling pressure above 83500, and those chasing highs got pressed down again.
I scanned the order book: support at 82500-82800, buy orders thicker than last night, but sell orders pile up at 83500-84000. Volume has shrunk significantly compared to the dumping phase, meaning panic selling is over. This is an oversold rebound, not a trend reversal. ETH is similar, hovering around 2495, pressured at 2500-2520. ETH is just following BTC's lead, no independent momentum.
Key levels I marked:
$BTC: Support at 82500-82800, as long as it doesn't break below on a pullback, it's stable; resistance at 83500-84000, only a volume-backed break above qualifies for looking at 84500-85000.
ETH: Support at 2450-2470, break below targets 2400; resistance at 2500-2520, failure to break means a rebound.When evaluating public chain projects, you can't just look at what the whitepaper says.
Take ACO as an example. The whitepaper's planned direction includes not only the underlying public chain but also modules like DEX, DApp, social content, cross-chain, and community governance.
For these modules to form a complete ecosystem, it involves not only technical development but also product experience, user adoption, and synergy among applications.
Therefore, when researching such projects, you can separate a few questions:
1. How is the development progress of the underlying infrastructure?
2. Are the planned applications actually implemented?
3. Are there real users and genuine usage demands?
4. Is the subsequent roadmap advancing according to the public plan?
The whitepaper can help us understand the project's design concept, but ultimately it needs to be verified by actual progress.
The above content is for project research communication only and does not constitute investment advice. $W
W fell more than 7%. Can the growth in cross-chain usage explain the token demand?
This morning's 24-hour spot observation window: range 0.01476—0.0185 USDT, change -7.61%, trading volume about 5.15 million USDT.
The quote is near the lower end of the range, and buyers have not yet reclaimed the main lost ground. Cross-chain message volume, fee income, and token holder equity have different constraints; real usage growth does not necessarily translate into equivalent token buying pressure.
If usage data lacks improvement and the rebound continues to face resistance, maintain caution; if clear transmission is disclosed and pullback support recovers, then increase fundamental explanations.Key Price Levels
Direction Price Level Significance
Upper Resistance 83,600 Convergence zone of 1H/4H EMA and previous breakdown point; recovery needed to consider bulls returning
84,500-85,000 Critical level lost; recovery and conversion to support is the true reversal signal
87,200-87,400 Recent highs, double top resistance zone
Lower Support 82,000 24-hour low and local psychological bottom line, currently being tested
81,000 Largest buy wall on Binance, but price briefly broke below
80,000 Next key psychological level if 81K is lost; breaking below may open space toward 77,000 $BTC $ETH $ZEC #霍尔木兹通航降至两月低位，油价跳涨4% Breaking down $DOGE this week, the breakdown wasn't a slow grind but was forcefully smashed open by volume. This kind of structure looks much worse than a typical pullback.
Let's characterize this drop. In early October, the daily chart showed low volume sideways movement, with trading volume once shrinking below 300 million, and the price stuck in a narrow range between 0.093 and 0.096; on the 7th and 8th, volume suddenly surged with consecutive sharp drops, trading volume expanding from 866M to 1080M — the largest single day in nearly half a month — with daily declines of 5% and 5.6% respectively over two days, and over 10% lost in a week. The high and low structure built since mid-September was completely wiped out, and intraday on the 8th it even dropped to 0.0811. The low-volume range was smashed open by high volume, direction clearly downward. Now let's look at the fundamentals.
On-chain large holders (those holding between one million and one hundred million coins) have collectively reduced their holdings by 100 million coins since Tuesday, and contract large orders are also selling — the big players are withdrawing, and those taking over are not the main forces but a pile of retail long positions with poor quality support. This characterizes today's rebound, which only bounced back less than 1%. The resistance band at 0.086 is still pressing down, and the price is hovering around the 0.084 line.
After the breakdown, the rebound is weak, and above are all trapped positions. So no conditions on the right side are met. The resistance band formed by several mid-term moving averages between 0.086-0.088 must be reclaimed to see a turnaround; above that are the key levels of 0.093 and 0.10; below, if the daily close breaks 0.084, the next targets are 0.078 and 0.070. No bottom guessing, let the volume speak.To everyone who saw the rise of $ZEC, I want to tell you I bought it at $400 and sold it at $1400
The reason I bought it was that there are only 21 million coins of it and its project is clear,
Why did I sell it? Because the price fluctuates a lot and as I always say
When the price goes up and people get greedy, I sell, and when the price drops and people get scared, I buy
Be wise and don't let your emotions control you ❤️ I’m waiting for it to drop to 700 and then I’ll buy again when you’re scared and selling. Thanks to those who read the message ❤️$MAGIC was heavily shorted yesterday, ranked first on the short list. It was shorted by noon, but it crashed before evening. By the time it went down at night, I didn't dare to open a position. I'll try again tonight. It probably won't die, right❓ #OpenAI营收口径引争议，AI投资回报受关注
The AI market is entering a critical phase: the market is no longer willing to pay just for growth stories but is starting to question how much return the invested capital can actually generate.
When discrepancies arise between revenue forecasts, actual income, and annualized revenue, investors first need to clarify: what time period the figures correspond to, whether they have been realized, and if revenue growth can cover costs of computing power, R&D, and financing.
The impact of this issue goes beyond OpenAI itself.
First, if AI commercial revenue falls short of expectations, the market may reassess demand growth for chips, cloud computing, and data centers.
Second, if companies need to keep borrowing to support computing power investments, rising financing costs will further compress project returns.
Third, even if the long-term outlook for the AI industry remains unchanged, the capital market may shift from broad gains to differentiation: companies with real revenue and cash flow versus those relying on forward expectations may see completely different valuation performances.
The long-term trend of AI and the short-term valuation of AI assets are two different matters. Technological progress does not mean any price is justified; what truly determines whether valuations can be sustained is commercialization capability and capital returns.
#OpenAI营收口径引争议，AI投资回报受关注 #9月FOMC纪要公布，多数官员倾向再加息 #BTC现货ETF创近三个半月最大单日净流出 $BTC $ETH $ZEC OKX perpetual total open interest retreated to $7.756 billion and Bitcoin market share rose to 59.23%, Ethereum funding rate at -0.0007%
OKX perpetual total open interest dropped to $7.756 billion tonight, with Bitcoin's market share across the network rising to 59.23%. If you hold positions, take another look at the night session as funds are retreating defensively. Bitcoin spot slightly rose 0.46% to $82,827.3 in turnover, while the total network market cap fell 3.03% to $2.78 trillion. The fear and greed index dropped from 64 last night to 59 (greed), and on-platform leverage is clearly being reduced.
I checked OKX contract open interest details. Of the $7.756 billion total open interest, Bitcoin accounts for $3.059 billion, Ethereum takes $1.751 billion, and altcoin contracts make up $2.946 billion. The altcoin-to-Bitcoin open interest ratio was compressed to 0.963, down from 0.974 last night, continuing to shrink. Bitcoin's unilateral open interest continues to suppress the total altcoin open interest across the platform. Ethereum's market share slid to 10.82%, with funds still consolidating towards Bitcoin.
Mainstream coin funding rates show clear divergence on both sides. Bitcoin's 8-hour funding rate is positive at 0.0015%, annualized under 1.7%; Ethereum's funding rate turned negative at -0.0007%, with spot trading at $2,487.76; SOL's funding rate is negative at -0.0028%, spot at $109.75. Shorts are paying interest on Ethereum and SOL, but on Bitcoin, neither longs nor shorts are rushing to increase leverage.#Strategy再购BTC，多家财库同步增持 $MSTR
Bought 334 coins, which is 80% less than the volume in the previous week's round.
▪️ Disclosed on 10/5: Purchased 334 BTC at an average price of $85,839, spending $28.7 million
▪️ Total holdings increased to 848,000 coins, with a cumulative cost of about $63.97 billion, and an overall average price of about $75,435
▪️ Compared to the previous round: bought 1,665 coins in the week of 9/21–27, at an average price of $85,681
▪️ This round's average purchase price is $85,839, about 14% higher than the overall holding average price
▪️ In the same disclosure, the company repurchased 1.5345 million STRC preferred shares for $151.7 million
The disagreement is not about whether to buy, but how much to buy — dropping from 1,665 coins in one week to 334 coins, the pace itself speaks volumes.
The treasury company's buying relies on financing: three legs of common stock, convertible bonds, and preferred stock. This round's preferred stock repurchase cost $151.7 million — supporting the stock price on one hand, increasing holdings on the other, but the same cash can only do one thing.
Direction to watch — next week's disclosure continues to shrink volume, combined with preferred stock repurchase, meaning ammunition is being moved elsewhere.