Orbit Post Sitemap
BITCOIN’S MOVE ABOVE $87,000 LAST NIGHT WIPED OUT $1.2 BILLION IN LIQUIDATIONS
That squeeze absolutely crushed short positioning
Now liquidity map has flipped
$86.5K–$90K→~$1.6B still sitting above
$77.5K–$85K→~$5.8B stacked below
$BTC still has room to sweep higher toward $90K,much larger liquidity pool now sits underneath price
That’s what makes next move interesting.If momentum keeps building,$90K remains play
But if $BTC starts losing strength,$5.8B below becomes obvious zone to watchOrder book 0.06149→0.07559, 20x long profit 458.61%. The price movement is not a stepped slow climb but a vertical surge in the middle segment, followed by a long period of horizontal oscillation, and a slight rise at the end. Combined with on-chain data, $LA as a typical micro-cap Meme has no substantial burn, with 24h turnover mostly relying on contract amplification rather than net spot buying pressure.
20x tolerance is 5% (0.0718 liquidation line), actual tolerance less than 4.5% (including fees). At 0.07559, bulls and bears are deadlocked; holding above this level targets 0.08, failing which it may return to 0.07. Core question: Is the slight rise at the end driven by spot market relay forcing a short squeeze, or is it a manipulation by controllers using high-level liquidity to induce longs? $ETH $ZEC #AMD市值突破1万亿美元，芯片股集体大涨 Dogecoin's roller coaster: 0.09 is the real battleground
Within a day, Dogecoin went through the full cycle of "hope—excitement—existential doubt." It surged from 0.084 all the way to 0.09, just as you thought it was about to break free, it shot up to 0.105, then sharply dropped back to 0.09. Behind the candlesticks, it's all the breath of emotions.
But this time, I'm not so panicked. What really matters to watch is not how high it climbs, but whether the funds have completely withdrawn after the rally. Around 0.10 has become a clear emotional watershed—pushing up is emotion, holding steady is consensus.
Many people shout "it's over" when they see a spike and fall, but I prefer to see it as an emotional cooldown. For a coin like Doge, the biggest fear is never a pullback, but no one talking, no one trading, no one excited. Now that attention is back, this is far more important than a single bullish candle.
I missed selling yesterday and got my leg slapped hard. But after calming down, I think whether 0.09 can hold steady is far more meaningful than just touching 0.105 earlier. I've held from 0.084 until now, already experiencing a full cycle of despair and excitement, so waiting for another pullback isn't a problem.
Once it stabilizes, I will continue to hold. Dogecoin's script has never been a straight line, but a heartbeat. #BTC冲高$87000，加密总市值重返3万亿 $IRYS 10x long position, entry at 0.01446, exit (marked) at 0.0161, floating profit 113.41%. Early phase showed consolidation, late phase surged vertically. Recently, IRYS as the Arweave ecosystem's data availability layer has been continuously gaining attention; the underlying storage narrative supports buying pressure, but token unlocking and staking sell pressure remain.
With 10x leverage, a price move of 11.3% is amplified, a pullback of about 10% (around 0.0145) triggers liquidation, so actual tolerance is less than 9%. Currently at 0.0161 near the phase high, longs are crowded, and sideways movement results in fee loss.
Question: Can the real buying demand in the IRYS ecosystem sustain this late-stage rally, or is the 10x floating profit only meant to exist before the spike? $ETH $BTC #BTC冲高$87000，加密总市值重返3万亿 Why was SanDisk suddenly ignited?
The core catalyst is Rosenblatt's first coverage, directly giving a buy rating with a target price of $2400 — 36% higher than the stock price at that time. The report states that AI inference workload is upgrading NAND from ordinary storage to critical infrastructure, and SanDisk's long-term agreements with eight major customers may cover about 65% of FY28 capacity.
Key levels
The upper 1832 is the 61.8% Fibonacci retracement level; a breakout target looks at 1980 and 2100. The lower 1730 is the short-term watershed; breaking below means the breakout failed.
My view
If it opens today and directly rushes to 1832, don't rush to chase — wait for a 5-hour level volume close above before following. If it first pulls back to 1740-1760 with low volume consolidation, that is actually a more comfortable observation point. The direction is biased bullish, but entry position is more important than direction.
For reference only, not investment advice. $SNDK 🔥 Short position space is about to be exhausted
The market has just reversed the situation.
$BTC, $ETH, and $SOL are rising, while late-stage short sellers are trapped on the wrong side.
At that time, after $BTC broke through $84,000, a chain liquidation was triggered, forcing the closure of over $648 million in short positions, with $BTC shorts accounting for $278 million. This short-covering-driven buying directly pushed the price above $87,000.
But the real risk signal is: open interest did not decrease; instead, it increased. After shorts were liquidated, positions were immediately replaced, and the total open interest in perpetual contracts climbed to nearly $160 billion, a new 11-month high.
This means the current upward momentum has changed. Previously it was "shorts forced to buy," now it has become "new leveraged longs actively chasing the rally." A QCP Group trader said: "Leverage is running ahead of spot."
The current structure is more fragile than a few days ago:
· Funding rates: $BTC and $SOL rates are both in a neutral to slightly low range, $ETH is slightly long but not extreme. The market does not show widespread extreme bullish sentiment, but this is actually a problem—the new leveraged longs are not paying enough "holding cost," so if prices fall, they will exit quickly.
· Spot demand has not taken over: During the short squeeze, ETF net inflows remained negative, about $300 million outflow. Galaxy Digital's research head pointed out that recovering the 50-week moving average has historically often confirmed a bottom, but that requires continuous spot buying to verify, which is not yet met.
Simply put: the short squeeze ride has reached its stop. Next, either spot buying takes over to continue pushing, or leveraged longs themselves become the fuel for the next wave of liquidations. An analyst from $BTC Markets put it more bluntly: "A short squeeze can create price, but it cannot create long-term holders."15 million USD is not a large amount in today's crypto primary market. What really matters is the list of investors: FalconX, Arrington, plus several well-known individual LPs.
This indicates that the money hasn't left the market; it has just shifted from retail narratives to institutional selection. Funds invest only 250,000 to 750,000 USD per deal, focusing on the Day Zero to Seed stage.
This amount means they are not chasing established projects but betting on teams that haven't been priced yet. The first fund invested in Monad, Ethena, Nous Research, so the path is already very clear.
The point of concern is that institutions are moving to earlier entry points, leaving less pricing power for the secondary market. Watch the LP composition of the next round of similar funds; if the proportion of individual investors continues to decline, this judgment will hold.
#欧洲央行上线代币化结算平台
#SEC代币化股票创新豁免落地，UNI盘中涨超21% #美国加密税收与BTC储备法案获推进 $BTC #波动雷达：币种异动观察
Just closed my $BTC position, holding U now, but I can't sit still, so I impulsively opened a $XAU gold contract grid.
Ran it for less than a day (14 hours), invested 88.88U for good luck, 20x leverage long. Currently floating profit +3.69%, grid earned 1.9U, and the base position also gained a bit. Watching the curve slowly climb without big swings feels pretty comfortable.
But the only thing that makes me want to curse is the funding rate on gold! It's way too high!
Going long on gold perpetuals, this funding rate is like a dull knife cutting flesh. The grid profits are hard-earned small arbitrage gains, but then you see the longs have to pay the shorts high daily interest. If it stays sideways for a few days, all the grid's spread profits end up working to pay the funding fees!
So why did I still open it? Because Goldman Sachs just said the Fed's rate hikes will slow gold's upward pace but won't change the long-term bull structure. I figured gold oscillating around 4300 to digest is reasonable, so I set a wide grid from 4256 to 4458, with a liquidation price at 4097, a thick enough safety cushion, and let it run on its own.
After the heart-stopping holding during the big BTC moves, playing gold grid now feels especially calm. No guessing tops or bottoms, no midnight monitoring, even if the funding rate is a bit high, as long as the range fluctuations cover the cost, making some pocket money for groceries is fine.The whole screen is shouting 86,000! But the real market-changing event, almost no one is paying attention to it
Brothers, today the entire internet is flooded with Bitcoin $BTC breaking 86,000, short liquidations, how much ETF inflow there is—
But what’s really worth pausing to look at is another piece of news that hardly anyone is sharing:
Circle $CRCL has launched a new service where institutions can borrow USDC using Bitcoin.
At first glance, it seems like "another stablecoin company launched a new product," unrelated to the market?
Don’t rush, this is worth a deep dive; it’s very significant.
1. What it does is not to make institutions buy more coins, but to let institutions get money without selling coins
Let’s break down the business logic in plain language:
Clients deposit BTC into custody → mint a 1:1 pegged certificate → use this certificate as collateral in a third-party lending market → borrow USDC directly into their account.
What’s the key?
The coins remain safely in custody untouched, but the money is already in hand.
Previously, if institutions needed money, there was basically only one way: sell.
Now there’s another way: use coins to get liquidity.
2. This is the real game-changer: the motivation for selling pressure changes
Market ups and downs are essentially about buying and selling forces.
Previously, when institutions needed cash, they had to dump coins to get cash—this was one source of selling pressure.
But now, "selling coins" is no longer the only way to cash out.
Chips are locked in custody, and if the borrowed money flows back into the market, the circulating supply only gets thinner.
Got it?
As more institutions learn to "keep coins still, get money in hand,"
the potential sell-off decreases, and the fuel for price rises actually increases.
3. What’s more intense is that this is not an isolated move
A few days ago, it just launched its own settlement chain mainnet;
Previously, wrapped Bitcoin was already launched;
Now, it adds a layer of on-chain lending.
Issuing stablecoins, managing custody, handling settlement, lending—
several components come together to form a closed loop:
Collateral goes in, stablecoins come out, settled on its own chain.
This starts to be different.
4. But the ugly truth must be said upfront
Over-collateralization and liquidation thresholds are set by third-party lending protocols,
meaning the risk hasn’t disappeared, it’s just moved from exchange ledgers onto the chain.
In extreme market conditions, liquidations still run automatically;
And with an extra layer of wrapped certificates, it means an additional trust point in custody and cross-chain.
Some peers insist on not wrapping, preferring Bitcoin to stay in original custody.
5. Conclusion: what really matters is not just this one company
The progress of this one company isn’t important,
What matters is how fast the model of "borrowing money without moving coins out of custody" spreads.
If it really becomes a routine operation for institutions,
Then the fuel for the next price surge might not be new buyers,
But those who originally planned to sell suddenly not selling.
The market is still driven by news calls, but real structural changes often start quietly like this. $0G 20x long position, entry at 0.1884, target at 0.2384, floating profit 530.78%. Price moved about 26.5%, with a long zigzag slow climb, and a vertical surge at the end. Recently, AI/DePIN cross-narrative partial rotation, 0G on-chain shows high circulation and shallow depth characteristics, with concentrated holders causing large buy-sell slippage.
20x tolerance (drawdown liquidation line) about 5% (around 0.2265), actual tolerance less than 4.5%. Currently at 0.2384 near the phase high, long positions are crowded, and sideways movement causes fee losses.
Question: Is the sharp rally at the end a spot relay squeeze, or is the controlling party quietly distributing liquidity at the high position? Can the 530% floating profit be maintained? $ZEC $ETH #BTC冲高$87000，加密总市值重返3万亿 BTC $87K is now sitting above every major realized price:
• Realized price: $53K
• 155-day realized: $72K
• 2-year realized: $86K
A drop below $53K this cycle is off the table IMO. The “must retest realized price like every prior bear” thesis just lost its last clean setup.🔷 Why watch $NEAR
• Leader of the alt rally on September 20, narrative "AI money"
• Chain abstraction and signatures — a product, not a promise
• NEAR contracts sign transactions on any chain
• Infinex is building cross-chain on NEAR Intents
• Venice AI launches private inference on NEAR
🧠 Chain signatures: AI agent operates on any chain without knowing the private key or gas. The bet is that the main blockchain user is AI, not humans.
🔮 Watch: transactions through signatures, AI projects, TVL$ONE spot has almost no trading volume, and 10,000🔪 can instantly create a dip, really impressive. Using spot as a reference indicator is really funny Looking at this market, it's indeed easy to start doubting life. BTC and ETH take turns pulling up, and even ZEC, an old privacy coin, is rallying. Missing out feels worse than being stuck.
📊 Real-time price snapshot 09-23
· $BTC: fluctuating around $86,110, 24h change +0.34%. It just touched $87,350 on Monday, the highest point since the end of January, currently testing $86,000 as a new support.
· $ETH: around $2,730, 24h +1.08%, has pulled back a bit from the previous $2,800 level.
· $ZEC: in the 1,551 range, 24h +2.98%, just had a 2.2% surge an hour ago, market cap has squeezed into the top ten.
🔥 About “technical analysis not working”
In a strong trend + short squeeze market, resistance levels are meant to be broken, and minor indicators dulling is normal. But this is not a failure of technicals; it’s just that the timeframe is overwhelmed by sentiment. Once liquidity retreats, moving averages, previous highs, and volume zones will start speaking again.
⚠️ Missing out ≠ losing money, FOMO is
At the $86,000 level, the risk-reward ratio for chasing longs doesn’t look good. BTC just pulled back from a 33-week high and is still searching for support; ZEC just surged an hour ago, so short-term momentum is quite depleted. If you want to get in, waiting for a pullback confirmation is better than rushing in now.
🍀 There’s always another train in the market, but if your capital is gone, there’s no ticket.
#BTC冲高$87000，加密总市值重返3万亿
#Strategy再度增持，财库同步加仓
#财报观察员：好市多Q4财报即将公布 🔥BTC surged 5000 points overnight, shorts were bloodied! But above 87,000, bulls should beware of this cut!
🚨 On September 23, BTC rapidly rose from 82,000 to above 87,000, with over $900 million liquidated across the network, shorts accounting for 80%, sentiment switching from panic to greed in seconds. However, the core driver of this rally was short covering, not spot buying.
📊 Resistance above at 86,300, 86,900, 88,800; the higher it goes, the less chasing there is; support at 84,500–85,000, 83,000–83,600; if broken, the validity of the breakout needs reassessment.
📉 ETH around 2,740, heavy selling pressure at 2,780, RSI overbought, support at 2,700, 2,650.
🔄 Rotation among major altcoins has started, XRP, SOL, DOGE follow the rise, but during BTC pullbacks, high Beta losses will be amplified.
⚠️ Leverage is building up again, liquidation risk of about $330 million in the 87,660–90,278 range; high interest rate pressure remains unresolved. Consider altcoin positions only after BTC stabilizes above 85,000.
💡 How high the short squeeze can push is not important; where the price stands after it ends determines the nature of the market.
#比特币# #以太坊# #BTC# #ETH# #OKX🔥 $ZEC just got another institutional spotlight—but there’s more to the story.
21Shares launched Europe’s first ZEC ETP in Paris and Amsterdam, with a 2.5% annual fee. 👀
The headline says: “Institutions are coming!”
But the real question is: does an ETP launch automatically mean strong long-term inflows? Not necessarily.
After ZEC’s huge rally, timing matters too. Products often arrive when market attention is already extremely high.
Institutional access ≠ institutional demand.
$ZEC #BTC$XRP XRP is currently in a high-level consolidation phase. After surging to $1.7 in August, it pulled back, representing a profit-taking washout following positive news. The core support is around $1.4, with strong resistance above at $1.6.
The biggest fundamental variable is the US CLARITY Act. If the act is passed, it will further eliminate regulatory uncertainty and open up institutional allocation space; continuous inflows into ETFs provide medium- to long-term bottom support. Meanwhile, the expansion of the RLUSD stablecoin and the tokenization of assets on the XRPL ledger strengthen the cross-border settlement narrative.
The main downside is that Ripple's own stablecoin RLUSD somewhat weakens XRP's necessity as a liquidity bridge; additionally, potential selling pressure from custodial unlocks and very low on-chain fees mean the price relies more on regulatory expectations rather than native protocol revenue.
In the short term, it tends to follow BTC's volatility, with elasticity between mainstream coins and smaller altcoins. Before the act is passed, it is likely to maintain range-bound oscillation, prone to spikes. Chasing highs has average odds and is better suited for buying on dips after pullbacks. Bitcoin's push to $87,000 has less to do with the headline number than with what the market refused to do on the way up. The move marks an eight-month high, and it happened against a backdrop that should have capped it: the Federal Reserve raised rates, crypto legislation stalled, and the news flow stayed hostile. Instead of rolling over, $BTC broke the $80,000 resistance that had bottled it in for months. A market that stops responding to bad news is usually telling you the bid is heavier than In an extremely greedy market, the funding rate for $ONE is surprisingly positive at +0.0019%, while the 24h drop reaches as high as 14.80%. This is the most abnormal detail today: the price is plummeting, yet the bulls continue to pay the bears. The Fear and Greed Index is 78, indicating the market sentiment is still in the extreme greed zone, but ONE holders clearly have not benefited from this optimism.
MA5=0.003778 has crossed below MA20=0.0039483, showing a bearish moving average alignment; RSI=41.8 has not yet entered oversold territory, indicating the downward momentum is not fully released; MACD histogram is negative, dominated by bears. The lower Bollinger Band at 0.00334626 is the nearest structural support. A positive funding rate means bulls are still holding positions and paying fees; if the price continues to weaken, these bulls become potential liquidation fuel — the probability of a spike to wipe them out is not low.
My bias is bearish: funds are siding with the bears, and the positive funding rate is a bull trap rather than a bullish signal.
Entry reference: 0.003680–0.003720 (short near resistance at the rebound around MA5); Take profit 1 at 0.003480 (above the lower Bollinger Band); Take profit 2 at 0.003350 (at the lower Bollinger Band, with acceleration on break); Stop loss at 0.003810 (if price moves back above MA5, the bearish logic fails).Writing
🚨 $ONE PRICE ANOMALY ⚠️
$ONE is showing a major price discrepancy across exchanges, with reports of a much higher quote on OKX than on other markets.
The key issue appears to be the pricing/index mechanism and liquidity differences. When thinner markets have a larger influence, the displayed price can diverge sharply from broader market prices.
#DailyOrbit $XRP $BTC $DOGE XRP is the cleanest gainer in the traffic rankings: healthy volume and price, characteristics of a slow bull** Current price 1.5554, 24h **+4.17%**, turnover 97.91 million (ranked 4th). - Structure: bullish alignment, position in range **88.3%** (1.248~1.596). - Health points (key): the only one among the four coins that "gained cleanly" — volume **1.05x** moderate increase, ATR **1.69%** (lowest volatility), RSI(1h) 60.5 / daily 66.6 **not overbought**. No overbought, no divergence, no momentum exhaustion, standard blue-chip slow bull rhythm. - Key levels: resistance **1.580**, EMA21 **1.535** / EMA50 **1.496**, lower boundary 1.260. - Strategy: pullback to **1.535~1.496** is a relatively safe entry zone; increase position on volume breakout above 1.580, stop loss below 1.496. Low volatility allows for **normal position size** rather than halving. > In short: least sexy, but the most reassuring. > > Risk reminder: technical statistics, not investment advice; single indicators may fail, stop loss takes priority over judgment. #BTC冲高$87000，加密总市值重返3万亿 #财报观察员：好市多Q4财报即将公布 #AMD市值突破1万亿If this rally is just shorts being forced to cover, then how much of the strength we see is actually genuine? 🫧 In the past 24 hours, BTC, ETH, and SOL all pushed upwards together, with leveraged shorts being forced to liquidate, and liquidation data piling up quickly. About $58.8 million of BTC was liquidated, 72% of which were shorts; about $96.3 million of ETH, 83% shorts; about $11.9 million of SOL, 85% shorts. This structure is very important because it shows that part of the fuel for the rise comes from forced buybacks rather than active spot buying chasing prices. What I pay most attention to when watching the market is not "how many shorts exploded again," but who is willing to take over at higher levels after this forced buying tide recedes. The event itself will be priced in quickly, but the secondary effects usually lag: when short squeezes push prices away from dense liquidation zones, short-term funds will first chase strong assets. BTC and ETH, due to better depth, are easier to absorb large funds first; high-beta assets like SOL are more sensitive, rising fast but also falling fast. Risk appetite at the altcoin level will be briefly lit up but does not necessarily mean broad diffusion, because if real spot inflows do not keep up, rotation can easily stall at the top. The bullish path is: after liquidation completes, prices do not immediately retrace, spot buying continues to support highs, ETH leads the mainstream sectors, SOL maintains resilience, and the market redefines this rise as a trend start rather than a pure short squeeze. The bearish risk is: after short covering ends, volume shrinks, contract positions accumulate again, and prices lack support above dense liquidation zones, then this wave will$BTC is at 86,000. BTC's big bullish candle completely blew out the shorts, reaching a high of 87,374.
At a glance, RSI6 hit 95.12, and the J value is 103.4. In textbooks, this data is called "extremely overbought, ready to crash anytime," but in the current market, it means "the car is too heavy, and the main force is still flooring the gas."
While Yilihua is talking about AI startups, Bitcoin is sucking blood crazily here. This rally doesn't need any fundamental support; it's purely a short squeeze. Retail investors rush in above 87,000, buying into the belief of "rushing to 100,000"; big players build positions at 75,000, selling your greedy emotions.
Those who haven't gotten on board are anxious watching this trend; missing out at worst means no profit; those on board are truly suffering—leaving early means regretting it, not leaving means fearing waking up to zero profits.
At the 87,000 level, do you think it’s heading straight to 100,000, or about to make a high dive? If you have positions, how are you planning to exit tonight? Share your real actions in the comments.Some coins are alive, but they are already dead.
The market surged to 86000, Ethereum held steady at 2700, even US stocks are rising, but ZEC can't even be bothered to move.
Why? Because someone simply doesn't want it to rise.
Whale Garrett Jin holds 200,000 spot coins, cost 437, with unrealized profit of 200 million, but only opened 60 million short positions to hedge.
Jiang Zhuoer directly exposed — this is called a "big spot + small short" bull head structure.
Short positions are for managing volatility, the spot is what’s really going to be sold. Once he closes the shorts and covers, the price briefly spikes, which actually serves as a cover for the spot.
The market rises but it doesn’t, all funds are absorbed by the mainstream, and interest rate hikes are still pressing down. I continue holding my 1486 short positions, with a floating loss of 29%, but I’m not worried at all.
Hold your positions, wait for the waterfall.
$BTC
$ETH
$SOL
#财报观察员：好市多Q4财报即将公布 Notably:
• ~1.07 million BTC accumulated in the $83K–$86K price range
• Breakeven price for US BTC Spot ETF investors: around $85,638–$86K
• ETF records positive inflows along with the upward momentum.
⚠️ But the big question is: Who will buy BTC after the Shorts have been squeezed out?
If Spot buying pressure is not strong enough above $86K, the uptrend may face profit-taking pressure and correction.
👉 In your opinion, has $86K become a new support or just a Short Squeeze?
$BTC
#BTC87KCryptoCap3T According to on-chain data, Garrett Jin is reported to have closed about 38,000 $ZEC shorts at a closing price near $1,465, while the initial position was around $660, estimating a loss of over $34 million. 🐋 Large short positions are exiting in concentration 🔥 Short covering pushed $ZEC to surge to $1,545 📈 Short-term momentum remains active However, what truly deserves attention is not this short loss, but whether the spot buying can continue to support the price after the squeeze ends. 👀 If spot funds keep flowing in, $ZEC may continue to test the $1,560 → $1,620 range; if buying weakens significantly, beware of a rapid pullback of gains. 🧠 Forced short exits can amplify the rise, but what really determines the trend's sustainability is still spot demand and trading volume. $ZEC $BTC DYOR | NFA #ZEC38KShortClosed #ZEC #BTC #CryptoMarket #TradingVoice$KERNEL's most unusual point today: a 24h surge of 21.68%, yet the funding rate is a deep negative at -0.7591%. The price is rising while shorts are still paying fees, indicating this rally is driven by shorts being forced to cover rather than longs actively adding leverage—this structure is most prone to a spike and drop after a peak.
Breaking down the long and short positions: the current price 0.0578 is below MA5 (0.05968) and MA20 (0.060685), with moving averages still in a bearish alignment; RSI at 49.7 is neutral, MACD histogram at -0.001252 has not turned positive, momentum is unconfirmed. Bollinger Bands range widely from 0.0470576 to 0.0743124, with 30 K-line amplitude at 49.13%, indicating volatility is overstretched. The Fear & Greed Index at 78 shows extreme greed, making chasing longs less cost-effective. Conclusion: the negative funding rate signals crowded shorts, but the price has deviated from moving averages in the short term, so chasing highs carries high risk; wait for a pullback before entering.
Bias is slightly bullish (buy on dips, do not chase highs). Entry reference is 0.0535 to 0.0555, which is the pullback zone below the Bollinger middle band and near support below MA5; shorts still have fuel to cover under negative funding rates. Take profit 1 target is 0.0607 (MA20 resistance, reduce position if RSI crosses above 55); take profit 2 target is 0.0680 (below Bollinger upper band, extended target after MACD turns positive).Issue 48 Trading Strategy Diary Reminder｜This time, I’ve decided to stop trading for a week
The two strategies given in issue 48:
Short BTC near 82000, short ETH near 2680, both ultimately stopped out.
Wrong is wrong, I won’t delete posts, nor pretend it never happened.
From issue 1 until now, I record both my correct and incorrect trades in these 48 trading strategies. Because I increasingly feel that the real fear in trading is never the loss itself, but trying to prove you’re right after a loss.
This stop loss also made me realize a problem: when you have a position, your thinking unconsciously leans toward your holding.
When bearish, you always look for bearish reasons; even if the market changes, it’s easy to selectively ignore it.
So starting tomorrow, I’ve decided to stop actual trading for a week, no new positions, just watching the market.
No positions, no emotions, no preset bias.
Short if it should be short, long if it should be long, even if I switch from bearish to bullish in the end, I’m not afraid of being proven wrong.
Because trading isn’t about proving how great you are, but about continuously accepting the market’s corrections.
Issue 48 can be wrong, and I may continue to be wrong in the future.
But I hope to always keep one thing: if wrong, admit it; if admitted, change.
This time, I’ll first pull myself out of the market and carefully watch the market for a week.
Let the market speak.
Let the price give the answer.
#BTC冲高$87000，加密总市值重返3万亿 $BTC $ETH $NEAR $BTC $ETH NEAR rose 10%, but volume didn't confirm: volume contraction divergence is the biggest hidden risk in this rally** Current price 4.47, 24h **+10.07%**, trading volume 58.41 million (ranked 6th). - Structure: bullish alignment, position in range **92%** (2.298~4.66), close to the upper edge. - Hidden risk (key point): volume ratio only **0.93x** — price rose 10%, but trading volume **did not exceed the previous 24h**, the only one with volume contraction in the flow ranking, a typical **volume-price divergence**. New price high with shrinking volume indicates the fuel for this rally is decreasing. - Key levels: resistance **4.613**, EMA21 **4.385** / EMA50 **4.215**. - Strategy: do not chase the high. Light position test if it pulls back and holds 4.385; **exit if volume expands and 4.385 is lost, signaling weakness**. The right-side signal is "volume breakout above 4.613," not "price hovering at 4.47." > In short: it did rise, but volume didn't confirm — let the trading volume explain first. #BTC冲高$87000，加密总市值重返3万亿 #Strategy再度增持，财库同步加仓 #财报观察员：好市多Q4财报即将公布 $SNDK SanDisk really has no issues, it breaks through as soon as it says it will. It failed to break 1800 twice before, but now with an added dividend, it broke through. It really proves the saying that bad news is good news when it hits the ground. Today's highest point even reached 1908. Although it pulled back a bit, it has risen again. I added to my position at 1860, so my average price is higher. The target is 2000, planning to consider taking profits around 1950, and consider shorting around 2000.Intensified high-level divergence, BTC, ETH, DOGE entering a cooling-off period
The short squeeze rally has temporarily paused, with the market surging and then retreating. Macro realities are correcting overly optimistic sentiment, and capital is starting to reduce exposure.
$BTC: Encountered strong resistance near previous highs, oscillating at high levels. Bloomberg strategists bluntly state that a 5% US Treasury yield is attractive; under the risk-free rate drainage effect, institutional divergence is increasing. Technically, OBV is flattening, and willingness to chase spot prices is weakening, requiring time or space to digest profit-taking.
$ETH: Falling back from highs with large volatility. On the macro front, disturbances have emerged—central banks reiterate virtual currency regulatory requirements, banning related businesses and linkages. This is normalized regulation, but during a sensitive high-level period, it amplifies short-term selling pressure. The long-term anchor of the Glamsterdam upgrade remains, but short-term technical repair is needed.
$DOGE: After a single-day surge of 15%, it has entered high-level consolidation. The Meme sector is extremely sensitive to liquidity; after a large rally, profit-taking can happen at any time. The movement of large holders' funds is the short-term key; once sentiment recedes, high elasticity will turn into high drawdown.
Triple resonance of macro suppression, regulatory reiteration, and profit-taking. After the short squeeze ends, the market enters a "de-bubble" phase. Don't get dazzled by the previous sharp rally; wait until the shakeout is completely over before considering getting in. $BCH **BCH huge volume +22.7% surge: What is needed now is not courage, but stop-loss discipline** Current price 324.51, 24h **+22.70%**, the strongest movement in the entire market's trading volume rankings. - Structure: 1h/daily **double bullish alignment**, 7-day range position **94.6%**, has reached the upper edge of the box (range 212.8~330.94). - Momentum: RSI(1h) **80.2**, daily 76.7, both overbought; volume **2.44x** — the trading volume in the past 24h is 2.44 times that of the previous 24h, a real surge, not a fake rise. - Key levels: resistance **327.6**, pullback to EMA21 **287.4** / EMA50 **272.3**, box lower edge 212.9. - Strategy: Light position chase on volume breakout above 327.6, or scale in on pullbacks between 287~272, with unified stop-loss below 272. ATR 3.04% volatility has expanded, **reduce position by half**. > In short: After +22.7%, the biggest opponent is not the market, but your own urge to go full position.🔥 Why is crypto suddenly watching Costco’s earnings? 🍗👀
Costco doesn’t need to hold or accept $BTC. It simply gives us a clue about the U.S. consumer.
Strong spending → sticky inflation → fewer rate cuts → tighter liquidity → pressure on risk assets.
Weak spending → cooling inflation → stronger rate-cut expectations → liquidity hopes rise.
So it’s not about the chickens. 😂
It’s about whether American wallets are still fat
$BTC #Bitcoin #Crypto #Costco #Fed
#BTC87KCryptoCap3T Today the account made a small profit of 18U. Originally, BTC and DOGE could have made some money, but ETH dragged behind. Barely broke even but still made a little profit. Anyway, not losing is a good thing.
Position review:
$BTC long: entry price 79880.1, current price 81269.75, full position 20X, unrealized profit 43U, ROI +34%. BTC bounced back and recovered, continue holding and watching 82000.
$ETH short: entry price 2504.53, current price 2623.80, full position 20X, unrealized loss 47U, ROI -91%. ETH is stronger than BTC, short position got stuck a bit deep, position not large, hold and wait for a pullback.
$DOGE short: entry price 0.09081, current price 0.08818, full position 20X, unrealized profit 23U, ROI +60%. DOGE continues to drift down, short position is the safest, target 0.086.
Market fluctuates, both long and short have opportunities, control position size and avoid overtrading.
Brothers, when can we finally afford a Cullinan?
#BTC冲高$87000，加密总市值重返3万亿 #Strategy再度增持，财库同步加仓 #财报观察员：好市多Q4财报即将公布 Bitcoin miners are starting to be valued as AI infrastructure plays, not just BTC proxies.
The market is already showing the split:
- AI miners: +21% YTD
- Non-AI miners: -8% YTD
Power, grid access, and facilities are becoming the new edge 🧵$ONE — I’m watching the short side closely.
There’s a critical data point here: the long-position profit ratio is only 35.96%, while the short side is as high as 75.19%.
continues with strong volume, I’ll reassess rather than stubbornly fight the trend.#DailyOrbit Whether to trade swings or hold long-term, choosing the right asset is the survival baseline
Real-time data on September 23:
$BTC around $86,124, 24h +0.36%, touched a 33-week high of 87,350, with support near 86,000;
$ETH around $2,731, 24h +1.04%, broke through a multi-month range, 2,600 becoming new support;
$SOL around $116.85, 24h -0.91%. Peter Brandt said it is at the end of a five-year cup and handle pattern, with a confirmed breakout at 240-260, and 80-85 as the invalidation line;
DOGE around $0.099, 7-day +19%, consolidating near 0.10 after crossing the 50/100/200-day moving averages, 24h +1.90%.
These mainstream coins have sufficient liquidity, depth, and mature price discovery. Swings have patterns, long-term holds have narratives; even if you make mistakes and get stuck, there are opportunities to recover and break even, with a large margin for error.
ONE is the opposite: funding rates once ranged from -0.1307% to -0.1936%, shorts continuously paying longs, settled hourly. Binance once narrowed the upper and lower limits urgently to ±0.005% due to a security incident causing spot de-pegging. At -0.13% per hour, daily funding fees are about -3.12%, over 20% per week. Even if the price recovers, the account could be halved.
Conclusion: Losses in BTC, ETH, SOL, DOGE are mostly unrealized and may recover; extreme rates like ONE cause real losses, the longer you hold, the more certain the loss.Just took a quick look at the market: BTC surged to 87,000 then pulled back, now hovering around 85,000. The 87,000 level was tested briefly before dropping, leaving a long upper shadow. News perspective: Short-term bullish gains are being realized, but sustainability is questionable. The fuel for this rally mainly comes from three factors combined. First, a large-scale liquidation of shorts. Over the past 24 hours, more than $1 billion in positions were liquidated, with shorts accounting for $840 million. After the price broke through 82,000, short stop-loss orders were triggered, forcing buybacks and creating a chain reaction of upward pushes. This is technical buying, not new capital entering the market. Second, ETF funds are indeed flowing back. In the past three weeks, spot Bitcoin ETFs have seen a net inflow of about $3.8 billion, the strongest three-week performance since 2026, with a single-day peak inflow close to $1 billion. But a detail worth noting: year-to-date, ETF cumulative net inflows are still slightly negative, about -$1 billion. This inflow is repairing previous outflows, not a full return of incremental funds. Third, institutional narratives are strengthening. T. Rowe Price publicly stated that Bitcoin has entered the core allocation range for institutions hedging against currency depreciation, and JPMorgan also pointed out that Bitcoin investors hedge more than gold investors. Once cautious sentiment fades, there is greater room for capital inflows. This is a medium- to long-term logic, not a short-term catalyst. However, bearish factors are also accumulating. The Federal Reserve just raised rates to 3.75%-4%, and the dot plot shows that 16 of 18 officials expect at least one more rate hike this year, with the median rate forecast around 4% by the end of 2026. $ZEC after a vertical run is a positioning problem, not a values debate.
Momentum is still paying and you trail it. Privacy bid plus a live impulse.
The book is crowded, the impulse dies, and the give-back is faster than the grind up.
Privacy is the story. Crowding is the risk.
Trail winners.
Do not turn a sleeve into a core bag.$ZEC after a vertical run is a positioning problem, not a values debate.
Momentum is still paying and you trail it. Privacy bid plus a live impulse.
The book is crowded, the impulse dies, and the give-back is faster than the grind up.
Privacy is the story. Crowding is the risk.
Trail winners.
Do not turn a sleeve into a core bag.BREAKING: The number of weekly spot DEX trades on Solana has officially surpassed the NYSE for the first time in history. This metric includes the number of individual onchain token swaps executed on decentralized exchanges built on Solana. In the week ending September 13th, Solana saw ~208 million spot DEX trades, compared to ~190 million on the NYSE. Meanwhile, the gap between the Nasdaq and Solana narrowed to ~47 million trades, the smallest gap on record. The growth has been largely catalyzeThe top three in this hour have gained another layer: BTC remains first, but ETH and SOL are tied for second place. In this hour, the mention counts for BTC, ETH, and SOL are 66, 22, and 22 respectively; in the same window, BTC is about 61% bullish and 5% bearish, ETH about 41% bullish and 14% bearish, SOL about 55% bullish and 0% bearish. The side branch ZEC was mentioned 13 times, about 38% bullish and 8% bearish, with a neutral tone, unlike the three major coins which lean clearly to one side. The previous window had BTC 70, ETH 28, SOL 24; in this window, all three coins are cooling down, and ETH has dropped from a clear second place to tie with SOL. When volume shrinks, the bullish text ratio may not keep up, and it could just be an illusion of a tie due to a thinner sample; volume ≠ transactions. Whether the ETH/SOL tie will hold temporarily is still uncertain. For now, note "BTC still first, second and third tied, ZEC side branch raising voice," and will update with new snapshots.ETH retraces intraday gains, but that doesn't mean yesterday's rebound is invalid
Today $ETH fell from $2807.67 to around $2740, a drop of about 2.4% from the intraday high. However, the structural judgment cannot be based solely on the highest point. The 24-hour low remains at $2706.87, and the starting point of the previous rebound was even lower, so the market has not yet returned to the original weak zone.
There are two types of pullbacks after a rally: one is profit-taking, where the price rebalances on a new platform; the other is a failed rally, where buying retreats and the price keeps breaking previous lows. At present, we can only confirm that the first step has occurred, and cannot directly declare the second step. Whether $2707 is broken is the dividing line between the two scenarios.
If the price consolidates between $2720 and $2760 and gradually narrows its volatility, I would consider it a healthy digestion. If each rebound is lower than the last and eventually breaks below $2700 with volume, then we must admit that $2808 was a phase trap. Being bullish does not mean refusing to recognize failure, but rather setting failure conditions in advance.
$ETH still has structural advantages now, but it is not immune to declines. Calling every pullback a shakeout is as lazy as calling every pullback a trend reversal. The market needs observation, not faith-based explanations. Let $2707 and $2808 speak for us; that is more reliable than naming every pullback.ETH has been boring me these past two days, oscillating around 2750, current price 2735. BTC at 85810, SOL at 115.
I originally thought there wasn’t much to say, but I casually checked the ETF data and found some interesting points: BTC spot ETF saw an inflow of 387 million yesterday, ETH had a net subscription of 162 million, and SOL totaled 58.3 million this week, with a maximum of 42.1 million in one day. The night before last, when prices were pushed up, there was also a 390 million short position liquidation.
In short, prices are sideways without movement, buying pressure hasn’t stopped, and shorts are still exiting. My understanding is that at this level, someone is probably slowly accumulating; otherwise, with such ETF buying, prices would have already soared. After the recent pullback following the rally, no one seems to be panicking to sell; holders are quite calm.
Today’s plan: For BTC, watch 87000; if it breaks above, add small positions long, but exit if it breaks down. Only after surpassing 88000 will I look toward 89000; ETH is moving more steadily, planning to accumulate in batches between 2750 and 2850, admit a mistake if it breaks 2650, watch 2900 if it passes 2800, and look further up to 3000.
Nothing else, just consolidation, waiting for the wind to come. Set stop losses in advance to avoid panic if things really move.
$ETH
#BTC冲高$87000，加密总市值重返3万亿
#Strategy再度增持，财库同步加仓
#财报观察员：好市多Q4财报即将公布 Focus on Apple, not just because of the new iPhone
In the past, the market positioned Apple more as a consumer electronics company:
iPhone, Mac, service business.
In the AI era, Apple is trying to redefine its position.
Several observation points:
1. AI terminal entry point
Future AI competition is not just about model size, but more importantly about who controls the user entry point.
Apple has a large number of high-value users worldwide and controls: hardware, system, chip, ecosystem
Agents are gradually entering phones and computers, and Apple has a natural entry advantage.
2. Edge AI + cloud AI layout
Apple has always emphasized edge computing (On-device AI).
Advantages: privacy, response speed, hardware synergy
Recently, the market has focused on Apple possibly strengthening AI server deployment and exploring cooperation with companies like NVIDIA in server interconnection and AI infrastructure.
If this forms in the future, device-end AI + Apple chips + cloud AI servers could create a complete AI ecosystem closed loop.
3. Service business will continue to grow
Apple is no longer just selling hardware. If future AI capabilities further integrate into the App Store, iCloud, Apple Music, and other service ecosystems, it could also enhance service value.
This position mainly observes: in the AI terminal era, whether Apple can become an entry-type company again.
Just recording my own trading logic, not constituting advice Maya transfers can be confirmed with Face ID: Face ID ≠ transferring money casually
Maya transfers can finally be confirmed with Face ID—provided you first set your current phone as a trusted device. Don’t misunderstand it as "just swipe your face and the money can be transferred casually."
The official help center states it clearly: after clicking Trust this device and verifying once with Face ID or fingerprint, you can use biometric authentication instead of SMS OTP for Send Money. Philippine numbers (DITO, Smart) often don’t receive verification codes, so this method is indeed convenient; but if the device shows Trust device unavailable, the trust device action will freeze completely. You need to switch to a trusted device or contact customer service, as the app won’t tell you exactly where it’s stuck.
My takeaway: Face ID saves you from OTP, not from security thresholds; first set up a trusted device, then talk about face ID transfers. A large short position of 38,000 $ZEC was recently closed, causing significant short-term market volatility. On-chain data shows that Garrett Jin's related position was closed around $1,460, while the initial entry price was about $650, with an estimated loss of approximately $35M on this trade. 📌 What truly deserves attention is the subsequent market structure: 🐋 Large short positions exit 🔥 Short covering further amplifies upward momentum 📈 $ZEC once pushed near $1,530 👀 Next, focus on whether spot buying can continue the momentum The short squeeze-driven rise usually gradually weakens; the real test is: after short covering ends, can spot funds continue to support $ZEC's high-level performance? $ZEC $BTC #ZEC38KShortClosed #ZEC #Bitcoin #CryptoMarketIs the current macro setup actually supportive of the speculative rotation into $XRP and $DOGE, or are traders misreading a temporary liquidity flush for a structural trend? The honest answer is that both narratives have merit right now, and the distinction hinges on stablecoin flows rather than headline sentiment. When on-chain stablecoin minting tracks with spot exchange inflows, it creates a thin but genuine supply of dry powder that fuels retail-driven speculative assets. When that minting d✏️ $BTC
Overnight the rally continued up to $87,300, thereby testing Bitcoin's next resistance on the weekly timeframe, from where we immediately got a pullback reaction with price going back to $85k
Given the fact that we got a negative reaction from resistance and at the same time we already have a strong Bitcoin rally behind us without any normal pullback, primarily I now expect to see a stronger correction with price moving at least into the $83–80k area According to on-chain data, Garrett Jin has closed his previous short position of 38,000 ZEC. The average opening price of the position was about $656, and it was finally closed near $1,459. Media estimates based on on-chain data suggest a loss of approximately $35.44 million on this trade. What is even more noteworthy is the closing process itself: 🐋 38,000 ZEC short position exited 🔥 During the closing, ZEC quickly rose from about $1,490 to around $1,530, an increase of about 2.7% 📈 Hyperliquid's ZEC annualized funding rate once exceeded 170% 💰 The nominal value of this short position was about $58.5 million. Meanwhile, on-chain data shows that the address still holds about 202,000 ZEC spot, so this short trade may have also had a hedging nature and should not be simply understood as a pure bet on ZEC's decline. What is now truly worth observing is whether the spot market can continue to support ZEC's high price after the short-term buying pressure brought by the massive short covering fades. $ZEC $BTC #ZEC38KShortClosed #ZEC #BTC #Crypto