Orbit Post Sitemap
#TrumpGulfIranTalks
#IranCeasefireTerms
Oil's next big move may come from diplomacy, not supply 👀
Iran says it sent three ceasefire terms via Qatar: end the conflict, release frozen funds and lift the maritime blockade. The US not confirmed progress.
What caught my attention is market two very different paths ahead.
A deal strip risk premium from oil. Failure could keep crude elevated, feed inflation and pressure yields.
The next oil catalyst may be Trump's response, not another tanker.#ZEC whale closes 38,000 short positions, losing over $35 million
The crypto world is really tough to play now, it’s even turned into a murder mystery game—who’s the wolf? Who’s the good guy? Whale losses? That’s just what the whale wants you to see!
Garrett Jin closed all ZEC short positions at market price, aggressively filling orders. In just 90 minutes, ZEC rose from around 1490 to 1530, up 2.7%. On the surface, it looks like the shorts gave up, taking a $35 million loss and cutting their position. But in the end, he didn’t sell a single one of the 202,000 ZEC spot holdings he had.
So is that $35 million really a “loss”?
If the shorts were originally hedging the spot holdings, then the story is completely different. When the spot price rises, he profits; when the shorts fall, he profits; now he’s just removed the hedge, holding onto a huge spot position.
But is it possible that he deliberately removed the biggest short target to let the market start FOMO on its own?
I can’t say for sure that Garrett Jin thinks this way, but at least looking at the position structure, focusing only on the “lost $35 million” figure makes it easy to oversimplify the situation.
The NU7 upgrade is still progressing, with testnet and mainnet timelines moving forward, and ZEC’s fundamental narrative hasn’t disappeared just because of this short position closure. 🔥Today's surge is not just a simple emotional pump; at least three forces are simultaneously driving it!
🚀The first "sweetener" comes from the SEC. On September 17, the SEC officially launched the "Innovation Exemption," providing a 5-year conditional regulatory exemption for platforms that tokenize certain US stocks, giving on-chain trading of traditional assets a clearer compliance path.
🥊The second key point is that the market has withstood previous negative news. On September 15, the CLARITY Act procedural vote failed to advance with a 49:50 split; on September 16, the Fed raised interest rates by 25 basis points, pushing the range to 3.75%–4%. BTC briefly dipped near 75,000 but did not continue to crash.
💥The third catalyst is a short squeeze. During BTC's rebound to 85,000, over $750 million in liquidations occurred across the market in the past 24 hours, with shorts accounting for about $648 million, and the largest single BTC liquidation around $11.3 million.
🧠 So the most important thing to watch in this rally is not "why the bad news didn't cause a drop," but that the market is repricing the positives.
⚠️ But short squeeze rallies rise fast and can fall hard too. The more continuous the surge, the more you shouldn't mistake short-term sentiment for a risk-free bull market.
Brothers, do you think this wave is "all the bad news priced in," or just a pure short-covering rally? $BTC #加密总市值重返2.8万亿美元 SOL continues to rally, directly surpassing the weekend level of 114.3 at 117.9.
Yesterday opened at 111.7, peaked at 112.5, bottomed at 107.4, closed at 108.8, with a volume of 63.6 million. Today opened at 108.8, peaked at 117.9, bottomed at 108.5, current price around 116.8. Volume is 117 million, connecting with Saturday's 114 million.
Resistance remains between 116.8 and 117.9 above. Support to watch first is 108.5, and if broken, 107.4 is likely.
Don't chase 117.9 in the short term. Those holding should watch if 108.5 support holds; if not, reduce positions. Volume has returned, but if 117.9 can't hold, reduce positions first and wait for the European and American sessions to see if 116.8 can hold. $SOL ETH/BTC dropped to 0.03219, stop comforting yourself with "ETH will catch up when the market rises"
As of 23:06 on September 20, ETH/BTC was at 0.03219, opening about 0.03237 in the past 24 hours, with a low of 0.03198. The USD price remains near 2600, but the exchange rate has not strengthened accordingly, indicating that funds still favor BTC within mainstream assets.
A weak exchange rate does not mean ETH has no value, but it directly affects market quality. Even if the market is warming up, if BTC absorbs most of the incremental funds, ETH’s rise is more likely to rely on short covering and high beta following; only when ETH/BTC stops falling does it indicate that funds are actively pricing Ethereum based on its own staking, settlement, and application logic.
Long-term holders should not dismiss all judgments because of a one-day exchange rate drop, but they also cannot explain every lag as "rotation hasn’t come yet." The USD chart looks good while the exchange rate continues to weaken, indicating that gains are mostly from broad market rallies; only when both charts strengthen simultaneously does it mean funds truly start increasing ETH’s weighting.Why is SUI more worth chasing than NEAR among the soaring public chain sector?
The answer lies in relative strength. $SUI is up 28.34% in 24 hours, with a trading volume of 237.4M. The MA5=1.01758 has clearly crossed above MA20=0.947095, showing a bullish moving average alignment; RSI=80.2 has entered the overbought zone, but the MACD histogram +0.009023 continues to expand, indicating momentum has not weakened. In contrast, $NEAR is only up 12.97% in 24h, with MA5=4.1938 still below MA20=4.21705, the MACD histogram -0.03623 is bearish, and the price is suppressed below the Bollinger middle band, showing weak follow-up buying. Within the same sector, capital clearly favors the stronger one.
However, the current price of 1.0487 is close to the Bollinger upper band at 1.05032, indicating a short-term pullback may be needed. Coupled with a Fear & Greed Index of 70 indicating greed and a positive funding rate of +0.0100%, chasing at this level is not cost-effective.
The strategy remains bullish, waiting for a pullback to enter: entry reference at 1.005–1.020 (MA5 support and round number confluence), take profit 1 at 1.085 (extension after breaking the Bollinger upper band), take profit 2 at 1.130 (previous high target), stop loss at 0.965 (if price breaks below MA5 and loses 0.97, the bullish structure is broken). If RSI falls below 70 but price holds MA5, it can be seen as a healthy rotation.#200 Yuan Challenge to 1 Million Phase 2 · Day 5
Today is the first day I switched to both long and short positions, and also the worst day. To be honest throughout, no embellishment.
From early night to the peak: the account reached a high of 739 yuan (up from 140). That $AKE position, I closed it proactively—because the conditions no longer met my entry logic. Later at night it dropped back to over 400: I waited for conditions to re-enter, but the price dropped again, and last night’s position was down to 140, so I cut losses and closed.
During the day: I followed the top gainer on the leaderboard, but the leverage was too high and my position was liquidated directly. The irony is—after liquidation, it continued to rise in the consolidation. I got the direction right, but didn’t survive to realize it.
Today the account was liquidated, all 140 yuan wiped out.
Around 7 PM, I deposited 140 yuan (20 USD) again. Guess what I did? I used 10 USD to open a 20x leverage position—during consolidation, it was liquidated again immediately.
Okay, laugh if you want, I want to laugh too. I accept this 20x leverage loss as my tuition fee: in the crypto world with such huge volatility, 20x leverage is basically giving money to the market. Saying risk and reward are proportional is textbook talk; in reality, the volatility kills you first, no chance to talk about reward.
Now the account only has 10 USD left. But these 10 USD taught me the most important lesson today:
This time I used 2x leverage, full position, 10 USD principal × 2 = 20 USD position size. The current return rate is already +32.7%. Starting slow, rolling slowly.
One day of liquidation taught me one sentence, which I write here and keep in mind: leverage must be reduced, getting the direction right is enough. Don’t blindly believe "high leverage = high returns"; it often brings high risk first, then returns—and most people don’t live to see the returns.
Low leverage, live longer; live longer, opportunities will come to you. I bought this lesson with three liquidations, whether it’s worth it I don’t know, but I won’t make a fourth mistake.
Let’s chat in the comments: have you ever been "washed out" by high leverage? After that trade, how much did you reduce your leverage? 🤝
Always use stop loss, low leverage, position management, all position funds disclosed. For reference only, not investment advice. #加密总市值重返2.8万亿美元 #ZEC巨鲸3.8万枚空单平仓，亏损超3500万美元 #特朗普将会晤海湾六国，伊朗局势迎关键节点 🔥Suddenly realized a detail: Why hasn't this round of $BTC dropped deeply?
🧠With the previous interest rate hikes settled, BTC only retraced to around 75,000, then rebounded all the way. Now it even surged to 85,000, and recently ETF funds have clearly flowed back.
🚗I actually think it might be because too many people are waiting for a "pullback to get in." Every time the price dips, those who missed out quickly buy in, but as soon as sell orders appear, they're absorbed by the buy orders below, so the deep pullback everyone wants never comes.
🔥But that doesn't mean it will never drop deeply.
What’s truly worth being cautious about is when all the missed funds have chased in, market sentiment is completely FOMO, and everyone starts thinking "this will definitely go up again," and buying gradually becomes overextended.
⚠️At that stage, you need to be prepared for a real deep correction.
⏳So the hardest thing now isn’t predicting ups or downs, but waiting. Fortunately, you can still learn while waiting; if you don’t understand something, ask GPT, and treat every market move as a review lesson.
Brothers, have you already gotten in, or are you still waiting for that big pullback?👇#加密总市值重返2.8万亿美元 ZEC Is Testing Demand for Privacy
$ZEC has a thesis that goes beyond market momentum: whether users still value private transactions when speculation cools.
The stronger signal is actual usage, liquidity and sustained demand. If activity grows alongside price, the move has more substance; if volume disappears after the initial push, momentum can unwind quickly.
Privacy is the thesis. Adoption is the proof.
#CryptoCapReclaims2.8T #ZEC38KShortClosed #TrumpGulfIranTalks XRP capital replenishment, but $1.5 remains a tough battle
Whale funds are back again. In the past 96 hours, large holders have increased their XRP holdings by about 154 million tokens, worth $220 million. $2.2 billion was repositioned around 1.3, indicating the market is digesting the negative impact of the CLARITY Act.
XRP rebounded from around $1.28 and regained the $1.40 level. This position has been gained, lost, and regained, showing clear signs of tug-of-war between bulls and bears. The key resistance zone is between $1.45 and $1.50; only with strong volume and a stable hold can there be a chance to open space towards $1.6 and even $1.8. If it repeatedly fails to break through, a pullback to $1.37 to $1.40 is also normal.
Fundamentally, XRPL's Batch V1.1 has received support from 30 validator nodes and is expected to activate on September 29. It can bundle up to 8 transactions as atomic operations, making it more friendly for institutional settlement scenarios. Ripple has also integrated XRP and RLUSD into Stripe-related machine payment standards, with XRPL moving from payment narratives towards real application scenarios.
Short-term bullish, but the $1.5 level must be taken. #加密总市值重返2.8万亿美元 ⚡ $ETH | NEWS FLOW MATTERS
ETH is getting mixed signals. Spot ETFs just flipped to ~$140M outflows, but BitMine keeps stacking ETH and Tom Lee says Q4 could bring stronger institutional rotation into crypto.
For me, $2.7K is the battle zone: hold it → bulls still control the setup. Lose it → wait, no chase. Momentum is alive, but confirmation matters. NFA
#DailyOrbit
#CryptoCapReclaims2.8T
#UNI21%RallyOnSECRule 🔥$BTC surged to 85333 tonight, pulling nearly 6% in a single day, with shorts getting crushed hard! Over the past 24 hours, more than $600 million in short positions across the market have been liquidated, and the squeeze is getting very intense.
📍But brothers, don’t rush to chase just yet; position matters more than sentiment. The 83000–86000 range above is a dense area of previous trapped positions, and breaking through it in one go won’t be easy.
🧱On the downside, first watch 80000, a recently broken round number; then 77100, and finally the cost support near 76700. Once the breakout is confirmed, former resistance levels could turn into new support—but the key is to hold above them!
⚠️So my plan is simple: no chasing above 85000, wait for a pullback near 80000, and consider if volume shrinks and support holds; if it breaks below 77100, the breakout structure needs reevaluation, and wait for another opportunity near 76700.
💰Don’t forget, the 30-year US Treasury yield remains above 5.3% recently, so the financial environment isn’t exactly loose.
Brothers, do you think this wave can really charge all the way to 100,000, or will there be a big shakeout first around 85,000?🔥#加密总市值重返2.8万亿美元 As I get older, I become more conservative. If it were the old me, when Bitcoin broke through $71,000 and the 200-day moving average, I would have done a right-side breakout, putting in the remaining 8 layers of positions, with a stop loss if it fell below.
Or when Bitcoin dropped to around $75,000 a few days ago, I would have put in positions, with a stop loss if it fell below $75,000, or gone all in when it broke through the previous rebound high of $82,850. But I didn't do any of that. The fact proves that not doing it was a mistake. Now the market has reached $85,000, yet I am holding 80% of my position and sleeping soundly, having gone into wealth management.
Indeed, youthful ambition is an irreplaceable thing. Being this conservative now has its pros and cons, but it aligns with my understanding. Deep down, I still lean towards left-side trading—buying more as prices fall. I'm not familiar with right-side trading; even if I enter, it's a gamble on luck. This time, Bitcoin's bear market bottom was too shallow, so I only bought 2 layers of positions.
I can say I have achieved unity of knowledge and action, staying true to my understanding. If Bitcoin really doesn't reverse to pick me up, then I accept it. I can't always buy at the bottom range, nor can I always sell at the top. I got the 2022 to 2025 cycle right once, and that's already a blessing from heaven.ETH at $2720, are you chasing it?
First, look at the surface: up 10% in the past week, 3% in 24 hours, peaked at 2749, OKX perpetual at 2720. Daily volume breakout through 2550-2600, pullback confirmation, structure indeed turned bullish. But RSI is close to 70, 1-hour upper shadows increasing, visible selling pressure at 2745-2750. Trend turned bullish, but chasing highs short-term is just giving away your position.
First thing: Rate hike landed, ETH didn’t crash, why panic?
On September 16, the Fed raised rates by 25bp, the first time in 2023, with Chair Warsh hawkish, dot plot may signal another hike. In the past, ETH would have crashed hard. But this time? ETH’s volatility is less than BTC, SOL, XRP; after the hike, it rebounded with ETF inflows and short squeeze. Negative news landed, market didn’t buy it. The ones who should panic are shorts, not longs.
Second thing: 35% of circulating ETH staked, whales and ETFs buying, but you’re waiting for a crash.
43.2 million ETH staked, accounting for 35.4% of supply. 1.75 million entered the queue, only 131k exited, activation wait over 30 days. Less ETH in the market, and it’s locked up. Meanwhile, BitMine increased holdings by 27.6k last week, total 5.98 million, 4.9% of circulating, mostly staked. On September 18, ETF net inflow was 143.8 million, BlackRock contributed 114 million, ending three consecutive days of outflows.
Third thing: Glamsterdam upgrade is in testing, but don’t mistake testing for mainnet.
Glamsterdam upgrade entered critical testing, Sepolia testnet on October 6, mainnet in Q4. Core is ePBS, gas limit moving from 60 million toward 200 million, reducing fees, improving parallel processing. Plus SEC’s five-year innovation exemption allowing public chains to tokenize US stocks, ETH benefits directly as RWA settlement layer.
But note: this is a mid-term narrative, not a reason for a pump tomorrow.
Bull vs Bear, you decide
On one side:
Rate hike landed, ETH didn’t crash, very resilient
35% of circulating supply staked, supply tightening
Whales and ETFs buying, exchange net outflows
Glamsterdam upgrade + SEC RWA exemption, strong mid-term narrative
Funding rates positive but not extreme, short liquidations pushing price up
On the other side:
RSI overbought, clear selling pressure at 2745-2760
Short-term profit-taking piled up, acceleration phase partly done
Upgrade not on mainnet yet, ETF inflows not continuous
Macro still tight, rate hike expectations not fully gone
Resistance above: 2745-2760 → 2800 → 2950-3000
Support below: 2680-2700 → 2640-2655 → 2550-2560
Trading strategy
Short-term players:
First buy point 2680-2700 on pullback and stabilization (1H no new lows, volume contraction then expansion), second buy point 2640-2655. Stop loss 2615-2630. Target 2760→2800. If volume supports above 2760, chase second leg, move stop loss above 2700.
Swing players:
Wait for pullback to 2640-2680 to build position in batches, target 2950-3000. If daily close breaks below 2550, mid-term structure weakens, exit first.
How to short:
Only two scenarios for light short positions—multiple failures to break 2745-2760 with 1H engulfing/long upper shadows, target 2680/2640; or break below 2640 with failed rebound. Otherwise, don’t fight the trend by topping out. The main trend is still an upward rebound.
ETH isn’t not rising, you just bought at the first upper shadow after breakout.
2720 is not an entry price, it’s an observation price.
You mistook a short squeeze rebound for a bull market start?
Don’t cut losses during consolidation, don’t chase highs during acceleration.
At 2720, do you dare chase or wait for a pullback?
$BTC $ETH $ZEC BTC's recent new high has indeed been quite strong, surging from around 80,500 to above 85,400 within 24 hours, an increase of nearly 6%. And this isn't a fake rally; the volume is over 20% higher than the average of the past 7 days, with large orders flowing in, indicating that funds are pushing this move.
The market heat is very high now, and the square is basically filled with voices like "breaking previous highs," "short covering," and "a new round of rally starting." After BTC surpassed the previous high near 82,300, short-term sentiment was instantly ignited, making it easy for many waiting funds to enter.
But especially at times like this, don't just focus on the gains. When the price rises too fast in the short term, profit-taking is inevitable. The key afterward is whether the breakout can hold steady. If there are buyers stepping in on the pullback and volume doesn't drop significantly, it means this breakout is of good quality; if volume can't keep up after the surge and the price falls back below the previous high, then it looks more like an emotional spike that will need to be digested with further consolidation.
Simply put, this BTC new high is not a small matter; funds and sentiment are both cooperating. But now that the market has reached this point, the focus is no longer on whether to chase but on whether the new high can hold firmly. If there is a pullback later, it could be a good opportunity to open long positions #加密总市值重返2.8万亿美元 $BTC #Company buying SOL does not necessarily mean the coin price will rise
A recent disclosure shown in a popular post on OKX Planet states that DeFi Development increased its holdings by about 101,381 SOL from September 14 to 18, with a total holding of approximately 2,490,300 SOL, planning to use them for staking and validator nodes.
The real points worth paying attention to in such news are not just "how much was bought," but three things: whether the source of funds is clear, whether the holdings are locked/staked, and whether the returns can cover asset volatility. If SOL is merely moved into the treasury, it looks more like asset allocation in the short term; if staking continues and participation in validation occurs, it indicates the company is betting on the long-term use of this chain.
I do not take corporate coin purchases as a direct signal of price increase. Wait for documents, custody, and staking details first, then see if the market has spot transactions to support it. Narratives can attract attention, but real on-chain usage determines whether holdings can be sustained.
$SOL #SOL continues its upward momentum, with funds and on-chain demand resonating together Circle Mint can now borrow USDC using BTC: institutional channel, retail investors can't access it
Circle has introduced Digital Asset-Backed Borrowing for Mint clients: qualified institutions deposit BTC to mint cirBTC (officially 1:1), then transfer it via their controlled Smart Wallet to third-party markets like Morpho, pulling the borrowed USDC back into the Mint account; the first batch goes through Morpho, with plans to integrate Aave later.
Don't misunderstand it as "everyone can use BTC to get cash." Circle clearly states Mint is not open to individuals, this lending excludes New York clients, and jurisdictional eligibility is subject to separate review; interest rates, collateral ratios, and liquidation thresholds are all set by third-party protocols, not guaranteed by Circle. cirBTC currently exists on Arbitrum and Ethereum.
Having a collateral borrowing entry on the official site ≠ you can borrow just by opening the app. Without a Mint institutional account, this pathway is irrelevant to you.Programmable accounts are not just wallets with a new skin; they change the very first step of ETH entering the chain.
Ethereum's official website gave developers a very direct reminder this year: stop treating user accounts as wallets that must pre-store ETH and can only be operated with static keys. After Pectra, the direction of native account abstraction is bringing batch operations, gas sponsorship, and more flexible permission controls into the ordinary account experience.
The impact of this on $ETH is not about adding a new technical term, but about reducing the failure rate for new users on their first time on-chain. In the past, users had to first buy ETH, transfer it into a wallet, keep the mnemonic phrase safe, and then understand gas; any misstep could cause them to leave. If applications can sponsor fees, set limits, and simplify authorization, on-chain products will have a chance to approach the threshold of internet applications.
Of course, improving the experience will not automatically push up the coin price. Sponsoring fees might make users less aware of ETH, and improper permission design could create new security risks. The real value depends on whether account capabilities bring more genuine transactions and whether these transactions ultimately still require ETH to complete settlement and security guarantees.
I am optimistic about this direction because it addresses the entry point of demand, rather than just optimizing for on-chain players. The biggest long-term growth for $ETH may not come from existing users making one more transaction, but from the next batch of people using on-chain applications for the first time without needing to take a wallet course first. BTC – The previous scenario is progressing as expected 📈
Earlier, I marked the 76,000 – 72,000$ zone as an important support area. After retesting this zone, BTC surged strongly and broke into the 80,000$ region.
Currently, the price has reached 85,480$, exactly the near target zone outlined in the previous scenario.
More importantly, the structure on the 1D chart still leans bullish: the price is above EMA34/89/200, MACD remains positive, and the rebound strength from the support zone is quite clear.
🎯 The next levels to watch: 88,000$ → 92,000$ $BTC Tonight Bitcoin surged to 85333, pulling up 6 points in one go, and 250 million USD worth of short positions were liquidated in 4 hours. The group chat is full of people asking whether to chase or not. Don't get ahead of yourself; let's clarify the key levels. On the upside: it has already broken the previous high from September 4th and is stuck here. Further up, between 83000 and 86000, lies a mountain of trapped positions from May and June, which can't be eaten away at once. On the downside: 80000 is a recently broken round number level; below that is 77100, where there was a wall of sell orders yesterday. If it pulls back today, that level will act as a stepping stone. The lowest is 76700, the on-chain cost line. Last night we were still below it, but tonight we've stood above it. Notice that resistance and support can switch places; what was your ceiling yesterday, once held firmly, becomes your floor today. The premise is: hold firm. Don't chase above 85000; nine out of ten times chasing highs results in standing guard. Wait for a pullback to 80000, with low volume and no break, then you can enter. If it breaks 77100, it means this breakout is fake; exit and wait for 76700. The 30-year US Treasury yield has jumped to 5.34%, money is still tight. Can it really surge straight to 100K? I doubt it. #加密总市值重返2.8万亿美元 Bitcoin has been rising nicely these past few days, and the US stock market has been booming too, but do you know that behind the global capital markets, there is a string pulling the bull nose of all assets? This string is now held tightly by the Japanese. Today, we won’t talk about complex economics; instead, using a high schooler’s logic of borrowing money, I’ll break this down for you clearly. 1. How does the world’s largest “ATM” operate? Imagine you find a super cheap borrowing channel: interest is only 1%. You borrow 1 million, then turn around and buy US tech stocks or Bitcoin with an annualized return of 10%, pocketing a 9% profit in between. This is the “yen carry trade” that global hedge funds and institutions have been playing for decades. For decades, Japan’s interest rates have been extremely low, even negative. So everyone has been crazily borrowing yen, converting it to dollars, and buying assets worldwide. The scale of this cross-border borrowing has reached 360 trillion yen. A large part of the global stock market and crypto market frenzy is fueled by this group’s borrowed “cheap money.” 2. Why did the Bank of Japan’s rate hike scare everyone? On September 18, the Bank of Japan finally raised rates to 1.25%, the highest in 31 years. But strangely, the yen didn’t strengthen that day; instead, it continued to fall, with the USD/JPY hitting 158. Because the market felt: this medicine isn’t strong enough! But no matter what, the Bank of Japan’s “water tap” has already started to tighten. 3. What does this have to do with crypto? It’s a big deal! Think about it: if the cost of borrowing yen rises from 1% to 2%, or if the yen starts to appreciate, then the institutions borrowing money will face double#CryptoCapReclaims2.8T $BTC $ETH $ZEC Current market funds are still flowing from Bitcoin to a few leading assets with real business support; the "altcoin season" rally has not fully arrived yet. Below are several clues sorted by risk preference, not constituting investment advice: Conservative and stable (institutional base holdings) · Bitcoin (BTC): Currently oscillating around $80,000, it is the market's directional indicator. Institutional ETF funds mainly settle here, suitable as a base hEveryone is asking: “How high can it go?” I think there’s a better question: How much of this move is real demand — and how much is forced buying from liquidated shorts? A strong price move is interesting. But sustainable momentum needs confirmation from spot demand, liquidity and capital flows. That’s what I’m watching now. Is this the start of stronger market demand, or just a powerful squeeze? Analysts, what does the data tell you? 👇 #BTC #Bitcoin #Crypto #CryptoAnalysis$ETH /USDT: $2,675 (+1.16%)
Breaking out of the summer range! MAs are stacked bullish, but the real test is just starting.
🐂 Bull: Whales bought $38M+ near 143M on Sept 18).
🐻 Bear: Fed rate hike & failed CLARITY Act still weighing. Needs to hold $2,550 to confirm this isn't a fakeout.
🔺 Resistance: 2,642 (MA20) → $2,550
Play: Don't chase the pump. Wait for a retest of 2,600, or a clean 1H close above $2,708.
💬 Ready for $2,760 or expecting a pullback? 👇
#TrumpGulfIranTalks The funding rate of $G is diving deeper into negative territory. Are the conditions for a short squeeze already ripe?
Here's the answer: short-term bullish, but this is a counter-trend correction trade, not a trend trade. $G current price is 0.00659, down 7.70% in 24h, price is pressed near MA5 (0.006534), MA20 (0.006703) remains overhead resistance, moving averages structure is bearish. But the key signal lies in the funding: funding rate is -0.1036%, the most extreme negative among the three candidate coins, indicating shorts are willing to continuously pay to hold positions, while longs are passively collecting rent. Meanwhile, the MACD histogram has turned positive (+9.048e-05), RSI at 41.9 is neutral to slightly weak but not oversold, price is close to the lower Bollinger Band at 0.00626918, and the amplitude of the last 30 K-lines is as high as 34.14%—high volatility combined with deep negative funding rate is a typical setup for a wick and short covering. The Fear and Greed Index at 70 remains in the greed zone, market sentiment has not turned bearish, and funds are more likely to use the sharp drop to reverse harvest shorts. $PHA The deployed contract remains an empty shell until the first deposit, which sets the starting price of the pair. The ratio of deposited tokens becomes the initial rate, and if it does not reflect real market value, arbitrageurs will instantly take the difference. STONfi solves this problem with an elegant architectural solution: pool creation and the first deposit are packed into one atomic transaction. This completely eliminates the vulnerability window when someone could distort the starting p$CORE staking and burn data are here again! TVL and BTC staking numbers look very impressive. Taking advantage of the altcoin market rebound, they are calling on everyone to recharge their faith.
To be blunt, isn't this just playing with three-year-old kids? When coaxing children, you at least have to buy them a candy first. This is a typical case of treating hardcore fans like fools; it's a test of holders' judgment.
The paper numbers look lively, but the core data reveals the truth: CORE staking rate is only 0.11%, BABY staking rate is 0.09%, and the vast majority of tokens are not locked in at all. Over thirty thousand tokens are queued for burning, which is just a drop in the ocean compared to the huge circulating supply.
The total staking amount is a static snapshot and does not mean tokens are permanently locked. Right now, the entire altcoin sector is rising broadly, not CORE having an independent rally. They are riding the market recovery to push the numbers and immediately bring out data reports to guide everyone to add bricks and tiles.
Anyone can make a beautiful report, but staking participation and continuous selling pressure are the reality. The market bonus won't last forever; when the trend recedes, these paper numbers will hardly support the coin price.
Those optimistic will use data to prove the ecosystem is advancing, but experienced players who have suffered losses in pump-and-dump cycles will immediately recognize this familiar routine.
⚠️ This is only a personal market observation and does not constitute investment advice. Virtual currency carries extremely high risk.$BTC /USDT: $81,223 (+0.39%)
Holding above MA20 (183M in shorts liquidated** to fuel the rally from $77,968.
⚠️ Warning: Open Interest down 5.27% — this is short covering, not new money. Analyst Jiang Zhuoer sees 84K resistance followed by a correction to $72K.
🔺 Break $81,700 → 81,220** → $80,134 next
Play: Don't chase the pump. Wait for a clean 15m close above $81,700 or a dip to $80,134. Tight stops!
💬 Buying the breakout or fading the squeeze? A clear rotation from macro-driven large caps into infrastructure narratives like $LINK and $AVAX would likely emerge only if on-chain activity on decentralized finance and Layer 2 networks starts printing sustained higher highs in the coming days. The logic is straightforward: when speculative capital chases yield, restaking, and scaling stories, it tends to funnel first into the tokens that underpin those systems, ahead of the underlying protocols themselves. For $LINK, that means watching ora$XRP /USDT: $1.4551 (+3.16%)
Breaking above the 1H MA cluster! But the real test is $1.50 (50-week EMA).
🐂 Bull: 10 straight weeks of ETF inflows ($17.1M). XRPL upgrade adds on-chain lending. Legal status remains solid (digital commodity).
🐻 Bear: CLARITY Act failed. On-chain payment spike is driven by bots/whales, not new users. $1.50 is a known local top zone.
🔺 Break $1.50 → 1.72
🔻 Support at $1.4127 (MA20) → $1.3736
Play: Do NOT FOMO.
#CryptoCapReclaims2.8T ⚡ $BTC /USDT: $84,730 (+4.37%) — Massive Breakout!
🚀 Why the Pump?
· $252M in shorts liquidated in a single hour (squeeze fuel).
· First weekly close above the 50-week SMA in 45 weeks.
· SEC tokenization exemption + $433M ETF inflows.
📊 Key Levels:
🔺 Break $85,325 → 88K
🔻 Support at $83,299 (MA5) → $81,745 (MA20)
⚠️ Warning: Open Interest dropped 5.27%. This is short covering, not new money. Don't chase the green candles.
#CryptoCapReclaims2.8T The total crypto market capitalization has returned to $2.8 trillion, and market risk appetite is recovering. After BTC stabilized at $80,000, another positive signal appeared in the crypto market: the total market capitalization has returned to around $2.8 trillion. This means the rally is spreading gradually from a pure BTC rebound to the entire crypto market. Previously, funds were clearly concentrated in BTC: BTC strong → ETH weak → altcoins under pressure → limited market profit effect. As BTC stabilizes at a key level, funds begin to spread to ETH, SOL, and some major altcoins, improving market breadth. This is actually more important than just seeing BTC rise a few points. Because a truly healthy rally usually isn’t: BTC rising alone. Rather, it is: BTC stabilizes trend → ETH catches up → major altcoins recover → total market capitalization expands → volume and capital breadth improve simultaneously. However, $2.8 trillion currently seems more like an important psychological threshold and cannot yet be directly interpreted as confirmation of a new comprehensive bull market. Next, three variables need to be closely observed: ① Whether BTC can continue to hold above $80,000; ② Whether ETH can continue to outperform BTC; ③ After total market capitalization breaks through $2.8 trillion, whether volume can expand synchronously. If total market capitalization is only passively lifted by BTC’s rise and altcoin volume does not keep up, then the market still belongs to a partial recovery. But if BTC is stable, ETH is strong, altcoins spread, and total market capitalization continues to break upward, then the market structure will2026.09.21
1. Main reason for today's market
Bitcoin surged 3.56% today, triggered by the "US Reserve Modernization Act" which mandates that the federal government's Bitcoin must be locked for at least 20 years without sale, and the Treasury will establish reserves within 180 days. The national-level expectation of "only in, no out" ignited the market. The other half of the momentum comes from the macro recovery after the interest rate hike, with ETF funds flowing back in net. The combination of both has fully restored risk appetite.
2. BTC trend
The direction is upward, with a high probability of breaking the previous high, targeting around 90000. However, this time there is not much short-selling fuel, so it is likely to be a steady climb with fluctuations rather than an immediate surge; any pullbacks should be seen as consolidation. Note: The bill still has to pass three stages including the House, Senate, and presidential signing, with possible back-and-forth in between, so avoid chasing highs. The greed index is already at 73.
3. JUP remains optimistic
It has already broken through 0.3: it is closely related to Sol in the DEX sector.
Fundamentals are stable: 90% of Solana's on-chain transaction volume routes through it, making it the main traffic gateway; 50% of the protocol's annual revenue is continuously used to buy back JUP, providing real financial backing for the token price; lending business TVL is rapidly increasing, opening a second revenue stream. Compared to the leading projects in the same sector, its valuation is on par or even lower.
Clean chips: funding rates are almost zero, price rises are driven by spot demand without leverage liquidation risk, so the consolidation won't be deep and holders can hold on.#CLARITY blocked, Saylor advocates expanding adoption first
CLARITY failed, Strategy's Saylor calls it a "positive inflection point": aiming for 50 million users in two years.
▪️ Two days after the vote, CFTC submitted the market structure proposal to the White House for review; SEC granted an exemption for tokenized stocks on the same day
▪️ He opposes three points: rewards for payment stablecoin holders, community bank deposit protection, sandbox limited to 25 people / 20 projects per year
▪️ He himself holds 845,050 BTC, accounting for 4.02% of the entire network, with zero purchases for the second consecutive week
The disagreement is not about whether to legislate, but whether to "expand adoption first" or wait. His argument stands — laws can make restrictions as permanent as rights, and users cannot afford the political cost. The premise is to reach 50 million users.
In the same week, his company did not buy coins, spent 139.3 million to repurchase 12% of preferred shares, and the stock price dropped 60% in a year. He opposes the sandbox's "predefined experiment scale," and he himself is the one pushing the scale to 4% of the entire network.
Four days after the legislation failed, BTC rose from below 76,000 to 81,700 — the market did not price in the failure of the legislation. His average price is 75,412, current price about 8% above cost; if it falls back to 75,000, the calculation for these two years must be redone.
Should we aim to reach 50 million users in these two years, or wait for a law that locks in rights forever?$ETH /USDT: $2,713 (+2.59%)
Clean breakout above $2,560 with a textbook retest. Whales bought $16M+ near $2,580, and staking supply hit a record 43M ETH (35.39%).
🔺 Break $2,749 → 2,786
🔻 Support at $2,657 (MA20) → $2,560
⚠️ Warning: RSI overbought, MACD flat. Retail is 69% long — weak hands could get squeezed before the next leg.
Play: Don't chase. Wait for a daily close above $2,725 or a dip to 2,657.
💬 Buying the breakout or waiting for a pullback? 👇
#CryptoCapReclaims2.8T $ETH Ethereum stands above $2700: on one hand, staking hits new highs, on the other, funds hesitate.
But looking closer, staking and funding tell two different stories.
On the staking side, more and more tokens are locked up. Currently about 43.16 million ETH lie in staking contracts, accounting for 35% of total supply, a historical high. Around 2.48 million entered the queue, with very few exiting; more want to lock than to leave. The cost is diluted returns—7-day staking APR has slid to 2.46%, more than halving from the June 2023 peak of 5.06%, and even thinner after service provider fees. For interest-driven funds, this return lacks competitiveness in a high-interest environment.
On the funding side, institutions are buying, but macro factors are pulling back. BlackRock added about $1.57 billion ETH via ETFs in 20 days, raising holdings to $8.7 billion; Q3 Ethereum ETF net inflows were about $10 billion, showing strong long-term allocation intent. But with the Fed rate steady at 3.75%-4%, the opportunity cost of zero-yield assets rises, making short-term funds more sensitive to macro conditions.
Technically, the $2700-$2800 range has over 10 million ETH in historical volume, indicating significant selling pressure; breaking upward requires stronger buying. Staking locks up long-term chips, but a 2.46% yield can't hold hot money. Whether ETH can continue to surge depends on which comes first: macro cooling or on-chain demand. $BTC $ZEC #加密总市值重返2.8万亿美元 #ZEC巨鲸3.8万枚空单平仓，亏损超3500万美元 Let's start with Bitcoin at 84,915, up 5.42% in the past 24 hours, hitting a new high since the end of January. In the last 24 hours, the entire network liquidated 650 million, with 136,000 people wiped out. Look at this structure: 11 million directly surged to 433 million, with Fidelity's FBTC alone entering 108.4 million. The capital flow looks very lively, right? But Santiment data poured cold water—new addresses and active addresses are only at the average level between July 24 and September 20, social activity is just 1.23 times normal, and on-chain activity hasn't kept up with the price at all. The violent surge driven by derivatives, once the short covering force withdraws, who will take over above 85,000? Open interest has already approached $28.8 billion, close to the May record; in this high-leverage environment, this kind of rise is just stockpiling ammo for the next round of liquidations. Looking at 8.63, 24 hours from 71 million. More importantly, the order flow is fractured: top traders' long-short ratio is 1.87, retail investors are 63% long, seemingly confident on the surface, but the active buy-sell ratio has slipped to 0.9156, with sellers more active than buyers. In plain language—old positions are holding on desperately, new money is running away. The 7-day SMA is 6.96, the moving average structure is indeed nice, but the probability of 8.43–8.24 is increasing. What leaves me speechless is around 0.81, down 2.83% in 24 hours. BTC has been pulled to 85,000, but FIL is still lying below the moving averages, MA5 is below MA20, the bearish moving average alignment hasn't been repaired, RSI is only 46.5, MA The positioning book of a large account tells a cleaner story than any index: $BTC and $ETH longs are carrying everything, while almost every other exposure bleeds. A 50x Bitcoin long opened at 80,488 and marked at 81,709 holds 200 coins for roughly +244,200 USDT in unrealized profit. An even larger 30x $ETH long, opened at 2,530 and marked at 2,691, runs 7,500 coins for about +1,210,000 USDT. Together they generate the entire net result: +1,344,300 USDT after offsetting the losers. The losers aBoth BTC and ETH hit new highs for the year, but the driving forces differ
BTC 85,062 (+5.76%), ETH 2,734 (+6.07%), both reaching their highest levels since January this year.
The difference lies in open interest: BTC's 24-hour open interest (contracts) dropped by 2.24%. Price rose while open interest fell, indicating the push was due to short covering, not new money; ETH's open interest increased by 1.82%, showing fresh capital inflow. Despite a 5–6% rise, funding rates barely moved, so longs are not crowded.
The surge was very violent: BTC's 1-hour candle at 16:00 saw volume spike 15.6 times.
- BTC: Resistance above at 85,480 → 85,600 (average cost for spot ETF investors, strong resistance); support below at 82,000–83,000 (former resistance turned first support) → 80,000 → 78,000.
- ETH: Resistance above at 2,749 → 3,000; support below at 2,660–2,672 → 2,608 (4H EMA20).
Position is poor: 4H RSI at 83 (BTC) / 75 (ETH), over 5% above 4H EMA20. BTC whales have a net short ratio of 0.75, while retail investors chase longs, increasing volatility amid divergence.
Watch the daily close at 00:00 on 9/22 to see if BTC's daily MACD confirms a golden cross; both measures are still below zero.
#加密总市值重返2.8万亿美元 #CryptoCapReclaims2.8T Crypto is back above $2.8T, but the part I'm watching isn't Bitcoin 👀
BTC pushed above $82K on OKX, yet this rebound has been broader. HYPE crossed $20B, ZEC approached $25B, while ETH, XRP, NEAR and AVAX joined the move.
What caught my attention is the non-BTC market cap. It climbed from roughly $1.17T to $1.23T before slipping below $1.2T.
That pullback matters.
A real broad-market expansion needs altcoins to hold capital after the first burst of momentum. If they do, this becomes more than a BTC-led rebound. If they don't, money rotating back into BTC could push dominance higher again.
$2.8T is the headline. Where the next $100B flows may tell us much more. #UNI21%RallyOnSECRule UNI has rallied sharply after the SEC created a clearer path for certain tokenized U.S. stocks and on-chain trading structures. Although the SEC did not specifically name Uniswap, traders viewed the framework as potentially supportive for automated market makers and compliant tokenized-equity liquidity pools.
The opportunity is meaningful because tokenized stocks could bring traditional-market activity into DeFi venues. Still, regulatory permission is only the first step. Uniswap would also need reliable compliance interfaces, institutional liquidity and clear legal treatment across multiple jurisdictions. My view is that UNI’s rally reflects a change in expectations more than immediate cash flow. The long-term test will be whether tokenized assets generate sustainable protocol activity rather than short-lived speculation.$SNDK short-term violent surge, behind the excitement hides the risk of being the bag holder
The storage sector's current market heat is at its peak, with SNDK launching a series of rapid attacks in the short term. After the price quickly surged, technical indicators have clearly entered an overheated zone.
Rapidly rising markets are the easiest to mislead people. The chart is full of large bullish candles, and the public opinion is overwhelmingly optimistic. Many can't resist impulsively entering the market, fearing missing out on this main rally. But the faster the rally, the more the short-term selling pressure accumulates simultaneously.
Around 1878, there is a large accumulation of previous relief selling pressure, making it a strong resistance level in this rally. When the price reaches here, it is easy for funds to concentrate on taking profits, resulting in a pullback after the surge. The more accelerated the topping phase, the more you should avoid being swept up by the profit-chasing effect. Entering at a high level can easily make you the bag holder for profit-taking positions.
1736 is the important lifeline at this stage; this level supports the uptrend in this rally. As long as this line holds, the overall bullish structure can be maintained; once it is effectively broken, it signals the exhaustion of this short-term attack and will trigger a significant pullback and adjustment.
At this moment, it is not suitable to act hastily.
For those holding positions, you can defend based on the 1736 lifeline, gradually taking profits near resistance levels to firmly lock in floating gains.
For those without positions, do not greedily chase the price increase. It is better to patiently wait for one of two signals: either a volume-supported break and hold above 1878 to open new upward space; or a pullback to digest the overheated indicators, stabilizing in the support zone before considering participation.
In overheated short-term markets, being slow won't miss opportunities, but impulsiveness can easily lead to short-term traps.
$SNDKAfter $PHA surged 58% in a single day, is it still worth chasing?
Conclusion first: The structure remains bullish, but it has entered the overbought zone. Chasing the high carries significant risk; only buy on pullbacks, do not chase the high.
Technical breakdown: MA5=0.05834 has crossed above and moved far from MA20=0.04374, with moving averages in a bullish alignment, confirming a medium-term upward trend; MACD histogram +0.002035 maintains bullish momentum, but the price at 0.0576 is close to the Bollinger upper band at 0.0612, compressing short-term space; RSI=75.6 has entered the overbought range, combined with a Fear & Greed Index of 70 (greedy), indicating sentiment is overheated. Notably, the funding rate is -0.0085%, shorts are still paying, indicating bulls are not overly crowded, and a secondary upward push after a pullback is possible.
Operationally, consider entry in the 0.0520–0.0545 range—this area is near the lower side of MA5 and just above the Bollinger middle band, serving as a pullback confirmation zone after the breakout, and can help reduce position cost during overbought correction. Take profit 1 is at 0.0612 (Bollinger upper band resistance), take profit 2 at 0.0660 (extension target after breaking the upper band); stop loss at 0.0470, breaking below means MA5 support fails and bullish structure weakens.
Also watch concurrently: $PROVE RSI has reached 80.8, more extreme than $PHA; $FTT moving averages remain in bearish alignment, relatively weak, only for observation.$BTC This morning and afternoon, I publicly shared short-selling ideas. The morning short position also successfully yielded a good profit, but the violent surge this afternoon indeed exceeded my expectations. Trading judgments are never 100% accurate; when a strategy judgment is wrong, one must admit it calmly, not stubbornly insist or argue against the market.
I have repeatedly emphasized to everyone to closely watch the two key levels at 82200 and 82800. Today’s market directly broke through these levels with increased volume. I also previously warned that once this range is broken with volume, the upper target to watch is 84000‑84500, and the current price has already initially stabilized in this range.
However, for the subsequent upward movement in this round, the market has not provided a very clear and effective reference point. The reminder I can give at this stage is not to blindly enter long positions at high levels; try to patiently wait for the price to pull back to key support before seeking suitable entry opportunities. If the market directly starts a correction later, the primary support range to watch is 81000~81500.BTC is at a key decision point. $77,048 is the major long-liquidation line, while $81,800–$85,000 holds heavy short positions. Since $85,000 is closer, the upside trigger may be easier to reach—but strong sell pressure sits above it.
At $84,000, the key question is whether ETF demand can absorb long-term holder selling and push BTC through $85K.#CryptoCapReclaims2.8T #ZEC38KShortClosed #TrumpGulfIranTalks This market situation really doesn't let people rest easy!
Just saw the data, today 4 old wallets that have been dormant for over 2 years suddenly came back to life, depositing a total of 48,047 $ETH (worth about $130 million) all into exchanges at once.
Brothers, this move is definitely worth pondering. These addresses that have been inactive for two years are either old investors who built positions at low prices back then or cold wallets of some big players. After two years of no activity, suddenly moving such a large amount to exchanges, my first reaction is: are they about to dump and sell off?
But we also need to analyze objectively. Although $130 million is not a small amount, given the current large market cap, directly crashing the market is unlikely. The key is the sentiment behind this—when these ancient whales start moving, it often signals some kind of trend. Do they think the current price has reached their satisfactory profit-taking point? Or have they heard some early rumors and are preparing to hedge? If they sell in batches, the market will probably remain under pressure for a while.① Oil prices have fallen for four consecutive days, with geopolitical risk premiums fading. Brent crude oil has declined for the fourth consecutive trading day, marking the longest losing streak in three months, amid rising expectations of diplomatic easing between the US and Iran. Inflationary pressures have marginally eased, and risk appetite has broadly rebounded. ② The SEC's “innovation exemption” ignites sentiment. On September 17, the SEC issued a five-year rule allowing qualified platforms to trade tokenized US stocks via on-chain AMM, granting multiple regulatory exemptions. This marks a symbolic shift in regulation from “containment” to “greenlighting.” ③ ETF funds saw nearly $600 million inflow over two days. On September 17, net inflow was $159.5 million, expanding further to $433 million on the 18th. Fidelity's FBTC alone attracted $310 million, BlackRock's IBIT gained $108 million, totaling about $593 million over two days, turning the weekly fund flow from net outflow to positive. ④ Short squeeze fuels the price rally. Nearly $600 million in liquidations occurred across the network in 24 hours, with shorts accounting for $505 million. After a dense cluster of liquidations near 82,000 was triggered, shorts were forced to cover, further pushing prices higher. But don't get carried away. JPMorgan warns that a significant portion of this rebound is driven by short squeezes, "which does not equate to sustained new demand." The 83,000-86,000 range is identified by Glassnode as a major supply zone above, requiring short-term consolidation. BTC current price is 85,125, with resistance at 86,000-86,500 and support at 83,000-83,500. Operation: For positions, set stop loss below 82,000; for no positions, wait.To be clear, don't be misled: Apple has not officially announced support for stablecoins. The fact is that on August 26, there was a job posting for an "Apple Pay Financial Product Strategy Lead," listing "knowledge of stablecoins, tokenized deposits, blockchain" as preferred qualifications, with a high salary offered. That's all there is to it, yet screenshots were translated as "Apple hints at adding stablecoins, allowing Apple Pay crypto payments," which is media exaggeration. So far, there is no evidence that Apple plans to issue stablecoins or add specific features.
However, this job posting is indeed worth attention; its signal is more significant than the event itself. Apple is seriously evaluating integrating digital assets into the Apple Pay, Apple Card, and Apple Cash payment systems used by over a billion people worldwide. In the same week, Google also recruited a Web3 architect in Hong Kong, explicitly mentioning stablecoin payment networks and RWA tokenization, and Samsung is adding similar features to its wallet. When the world's largest terminal and payment companies simultaneously form teams to study this, the direction is clear: stablecoins entering mainstream payments is an irreversible trend. The question for giants is not whether to do it, but who will do it first and how to comply.
For us holders, this is a medium- to long-term positive; the demand and entry points for on-chain dollars will continue to grow. But in the short term, don't treat a job posting as a bullish signal to rush in. The real turning point is the day the product launches, and there will be many expectation fluctuations in between. My strategy remains unchanged: hold spot BTC after it breaks 84,000, don't chase highs but wait for a pullback, and tomorrow, as planned, reduce 14 SOL to supplement BTC, adjusting my account allocation to comply.The question in this article really hits the trader's psychology: when you're Long and see the market shaking, should you open a Short to hedge?
The BTC position is currently Long with unrealized profit around +2,480 USDT, but the poster is considering opening a small Short order to hedge.
In my opinion, hedging isn't automatically safer just because you open a Short. It only truly makes sense when you clearly identify which profit portion you want to protect and how much upside you're willing1. A bull market is not a straight line going up; deep corrections also exist within a bull market.
Intermediate pullbacks in a bull market often reach 20%~40%. OKB is a platform token with high elasticity and intense capital competition. When the overall BTC market shows a temporary peak, platform tokens often experience sharper declines than mainstream coins. During such phases, reasonable short-term short positions themselves are trading opportunities, not irreversible disasters.
What truly ruins short sellers is not the act of shorting itself, but failing to set stop losses, holding losing positions, and continuously averaging down to reduce cost. This is essentially the same problem you saw with $ZEC, where holding short positions led to escalating losses—not that shorting as a strategy is invalid. If you go long without stop losses, encountering an intermediate correction in a bull market will also cause significant drawdowns, potentially wiping out all profits. Going long can tolerate multiple mistakes, provided each trade has proper risk control; heavy positions held without stop losses can also lead to big losses.
2. Declining returns after profit-taking is a normal capital flow phenomenon and does not mean a higher certainty of continued price increase.
When you previously took profits, your principal size shrank. Subsequent additional OKB purchases change the asset base, naturally lowering the percentage return. This is just a change in accounting figures and does not indicate a stronger certainty of OKB’s future upside. Platform token performance is highly tied to exchange traffic and overall market capital enthusiasm; once market risk appetite quickly declines, OKB’s correction will be rapid.
3. "I don’t profit from shorting in a bull market" essentially means voluntarily giving up a type of trading opportunity, but this should not be absolutized.
You can choose to only go long and avoid shorting; this is a personal trading style and perfectly fine. But it should not be concluded that shorting in a bull market will definitely lead to being trapped. The key distinction is whether it’s short-term tactical pullback trading or heavy long-term contrarian top guessing. The former has stop loss protection and controllable risk; the latter, heavy positions held without stop losses, is high-risk behavior.