Orbit Post Sitemap
Retail trading volume surged 61%, which two coins did the money rush into first?📈
#Robinhood加密交易量8月环比增61%
$BTC 77270, still that frustrating background, bouncing between 77000 and 77500, but retail trading volume on Robinhood soared 61% in one month, indicating people are back, just not daring to touch the big coin yet, playing with something more exciting first.
$DOGE 0.085, the first coin retail investors rushed back to, when meme sentiment heats up it spikes first, 0.086 to 0.09 is all trapped positions, purely driven by capital, rises fast and falls fast, play small positions, don’t get ambitious.
$ASTER 0.69, a decentralized perpetual contract platform token, the more active retail investors are, the more it benefits, platform fees rise accordingly, but it has underperformed the market these past two days, with a market cap of 1.87 billion, still 70% below its all-time high, the logic is right but the price hasn’t caught up.
Retail investors returning isn’t necessarily a good thing, sentiment coins fly first, contract platforms rise later, play DOGE small, wait for ASTER’s performance to catch up, don’t catch the falling knife at the peak of sentiment.
#PPI、CPI公布后，多家机构上调9月加息预期 $BTC is holding up better than $ETH and $SOL, but I wouldn’t call that bullish just yet.
The bigger signal is defensive positioning.
When BTC loses less while higher-beta assets fall harder, capital may simply be moving toward the safer side of crypto.
For me, this is about confirmation—not prediction.
Risk stays elevated until the broader market starts showing real strength.
#SeptHikeOddsHit90% #BTCSpotETF450MOutflow #OracleAICloudUp121% Feeling nervous? Maybe that's exactly what the market is trying to create. When traders become fearful, they sell. And sometimes, the strongest rallies begin when everyone is positioned for the same downside scenario. I’ve maintained the same view for a while: No September rate hike. Even with the probability now around 87%, I haven't changed my position. Why? Look at the situation from the Fed chair's perspective. Walsh is entering his first major policy meeting as chairman. Would he really wanRecognize the logic of capital differentiation: institutions are not completely withdrawing from the crypto market, but rather reallocating within sectors, shifting from BTC to ETH. However, the current overall macro environment is not favorable for a major surge in crypto assets.
If adopting a rebound shorting strategy, position sizes must be strictly controlled and error tolerance reserved; volatility is intense around the interest rate meeting, with frequent flash crashes and shakeouts, so high leverage and heavy positions are strictly prohibited.
Focus on two key signals: the FOMC meeting outcome and whether the BTC 75500 support level can hold; if the support level holds strongly, the bearish logic will weaken temporarily, so do not stubbornly hold short positions.$XRP is interesting to me for a different reason.
The story is not simply:
“Price is going up.”
The more important question is whether the network can keep turning its payment narrative into actual usage.
That’s how I look at most altcoins.
A strong chart can attract attention.
But real utility is what can keep attention around after the hype disappears.
That’s also why I compare $XRP with $BTC and $ETH differently.
$BTC → monetary credibility
$ETH → applications and settlement
$XRP → payments and transfer-focused utility
Different thesis.
Different risks.
I don’t need every token in my portfolio to do the same thing.
#SeptHikeOddsHit90% #BTCSpotETF450MOutflow #OracleAICloudUp121% Funds have started rotating again. Can this rebound continue?
Conclusion: The short-term momentum of this rebound is still present, but it has entered a critical verification zone. Signs of rotation do exist, but whether it can continue depends on macro interest rate decisions and whether mainstream coins can hold their core support.
📊 Rotation Logic: Why funds are starting to "switch positions"
From the perspective of fund flows, this rebound is not a broad rally but a selective rotation:
· $BTC's "seller exhaustion": On-chain data shows that $BTC's seller risk ratio (SSRR) has dropped sharply from 16 to a historic low of 7. Long-term holders have very low willingness to take profits, and the spot market "lacks sellers," giving bulls some breathing room.
· $ETH's "independent strength": $ETH outperformed $BTC in this rebound, once breaking through $2,600 to hit an 8-month high. Behind this is the exchange $ETH balance dropping to a multi-year low and three consecutive weeks of positive $ETF net inflows providing support.
· SOL's "narrative takeover": SOL ended a 10-month downtrend, with funds rotating to it mainly due to substantial inflows related to the RWA (Real World Assets) concept (net inflow of $348 million within 30 days), rather than pure sentiment-driven speculation.
⚠️ Can the rebound continue? Watch these three signals
Although the structure is improving, macro risks still hang overhead:
· Macro interest rates are the biggest variable: US CPI data (core monthly rate 0.3%) exceeded expectations, directly pushing up market bets on Fed rate hikes (probability once surged above 80%). If next week's FOMC signals a tougher stance, the interest-free asset BTC will be the first to come under pressure.
· $BTC's "lifeline": Analysts generally identify the support zone at 82,000–75,000–$77,000.
· $ETH and SOL's defense levels: ETH needs to hold around 2,475 to maintain a short-term bullish structure; SOL's key support is near $99.63 (20 EMA), and losing this level means the recovery structure is weakened.
The "fuel" for this rebound mainly comes from spot market reluctance to sell and institutional allocations in specific coins, rather than a broad macro bull market. Before the Fed decision lands, whether $BTC can effectively hold above $80,000 and $ETH above $2,600 is the hard indicator to judge if the rebound can upgrade into a reversal.This chart separates Bitcoin’s supply into four different groups: Long-term holders currently in profit Long-term holders sitting underwater Short-term holders at a loss Short-term holders in profit Most traders naturally watch the upper bands because they show how newer market participants are performing. But the band I’m paying the most attention to is the light-blue section: long-term holders who are currently in loss. Normally, this area is barely noticeable. That’s because long-term holdersBTC's smaller decline looks like relative resilience, not a reason to call a market turn. ETH and SOL are falling faster, which leaves me skeptical of a broad risk-on recovery. The more convincing signal would be those two holding up alongside BTC, rather than BTC simply losing less.
Just my read, not advice.The headline number is big, but the distribution of those outflows is even more interesting. On September 8, Bitcoin spot ETFs saw approximately $46.6M leave. On September 9, the outflow increased to around $120.2M. Then September 10 saw a much sharper acceleration, with roughly $282.7M flowing out in a single day. That final day represented more than 60% of the total three-day outflow. So yes, selling pressure appears to be picking up. But here's where things get interesting. While BTC ETFs werLSK current price is 1.1076, the 4-hour naked candlestick shows continuous lower shadows between 1.095 and 1.112 indicating support; the buy orders below are relatively thick, but until the previous high at 1.118 is taken out, the bears are only temporarily paused, not defeated.
The concentrated buy orders on the order book are between 1.100 and 1.105, with a series of stop-loss orders from 1.128 to 1.134 above; breaking through this easily triggers a quick wick. Halfway through, my phone vibrated with order alerts making my legs numb, so I glanced at the chart during a red light—this support looks like someone is accumulating at a low price.
The volume contraction during the decline followed by volume expansion on the pullback indicates funds are not distributing. Operationally, enter a base position near the current price, add another position on a pullback between 1.098 and 1.103, set a stop loss at 1.068; if broken, it’s a false support and exit unconditionally.
Take profit target is first at 1.142; if it holds, push towards 1.168. Keep leverage under five times; this is a breakout expectation, not a bet on your entire capital.
$LSK
#美国柴油价格首次突破6美元
@OKX星球 Opening the candlestick gives your scalp tingling: BTC surged to 79,888, then crashed back to 76,735; ETH surged to 2,667, then fell back to 2,479. The price circled and almost returned to the starting point, but those long upper and lower shadows were all traces left by contract players blowing out their positions. 📊 This wasn't market volatility—it was clearly a massive leveraged cleanup. Looking at Coinglass's data, in the past 24 hours, nearly 58,000 people were liquidated, with a total of $67.75 million across the network. Short positions lost 38.01 million, and long positions also lost 29.74 million. Looking at the longer term, the total liquidation in the futures market directly surged to $436 million. The bulls suffered the heaviest losses, totaling 323 million; ETH liquidated 141 million, and BTC consumed 53.96 million. First blowing up the bears, then flooding the bulls. You think you're following the trend, but in reality, the market is just liquidating leveraged positions one by one. 🔥 The trigger: the first wave of CPI injections Last night, when the CPI data was released, BTC instantly dropped to 76,046. A whale long position worth $70 million was liquidated, resulting in a paper loss of 1.6 million, igniting a chain of forced liquidations. The underlying pressure also came from the binding of oil prices and rate hike expectations. Brent crude surged to $104, inflation concerns returned, and the market bet that the probability of a Fed rate hike in September once soared to 88%. ETH is especially sensitive to this macro logic: oil prices push up inflation, expectations of rate hikes increase, liquidity tightens, and crypto is tightSingle Coin Capital Movement Ranking
$ETHFI shows dominance in active buying, but the price still records a decline: In 3 sets of 5-minute statistics, sellers account for 38.3% and buyers 61.7%, with the active buying amount about 1.61 times that of active selling; the 15-minute K-line for this root fell by 0.65%; open interest increased by 0.29%, open interest value changed by -0.047%, with quantity increase and value decrease coexisting, valuation changes offset the quantity growth. The transaction is biased towards buying while the price weakens, so the buying ratio alone cannot confirm that the price has strengthened yet.Which of the market’s former stars is quietly losing momentum?
$ARB surged 86% in a month but is now cooling off—wait for support and stabilization instead of chasing.
$HYPE has slipped from $89.65 to $79, with $77.5 key support. Falling revenue makes catching the bottom risky.
$UNI remains stuck near $6.05, waiting for a DeFi rotation.
Three coins, three setups: ARB needs a reset, HYPE needs a turnaround, and UNI needs momentum. Watch for the first one to stop falling on lower volume. I still remember the bottom line I set for myself back then: no greed, respect, and only seek stable, small profits.
With a strategy, I achieved dozens of times returns several times during the bear market fluctuations. During that period, it was easy to develop an illusion: that I understood the market, that my skills were strong enough, and that profits were deserved.
Looking back now, those high multiples of profit were essentially just dividends gifted by the fluctuating market, not that my trading ability truly transcended the cycle.
Once you lose respect and think you can precisely take profit and stop loss every time you open a position, your mindset begins to collapse. The floating profits earned will quickly be returned to the market in a short time.
"Many triple their money in one year, few double it in three years." I used to take this as just a popular saying in the circle, but only after personally experiencing a full cycle of ups and downs can one understand the weight behind it. Short-term windfall profits are mostly illusions brought by trends; when the market wants to take back, it never gives advance notice.
After this drawdown, I choose to temporarily step away and rest.
It's not giving up trading, but admitting my limitations. The hardest part of trading has never been finding entry points, studying order flow, or naked K-lines, but maintaining composure. When greed overrides risk control, even the most mature strategies fail.
The remaining funds in hand are the last bottom line. No longer rushing to quickly grow the principal, no longer fantasizing about replicating the previous dozens of times miracle. First, stabilize myself, protect the remaining chips, and protect the polished image my family sees.
The market is always here, and opportunities always exist. But once the principal and mindset are completely exhausted, it's very hard to start over.
$BTC $ETH $ZEC I did nothing, just hung there, it found me annoying and casually pulled me out. When the screen was full of green light, $ESP lacked support, each rebound was weaker than the last, pressure from above. I advised not to rush with short positions, wait for confirmation.
ESP was pressed down from 0.08402 to 0.08092, +73.79% gained, short positions realized, the earlier hesitation was worth it in the end.
First close 80%, keep 20% for cost price protection. If it continues to drop, let the profit run; if it rebounds, don't give the profit back.
Have a strategy before the market, discipline during the market, and reflection after the market. Don't get inflated by profits, don't despair over drawdowns.
Waiting for good news quietly, now is not the time to rush, wait for a more comfortable position in the next round, I will notify immediately.
$BTC $ETH Are you nervous? If you are, maybe that's exactly what the market wants. Fear creates selling. Selling creates liquidity. And sometimes, that's precisely when the market decides to move higher. I’ve said it before: I don't expect a rate hike in September. Even with the probability now sitting around 87%, my view hasn't changed. I’m still betting on no hike. Why? Start with the simplest argument. Walsh is the new Fed chair. His first major policy meeting carries enormous weight. Would a newly appOn September 13, ETH was priced at $2,499, down 1.16% in 24 hours, briefly dropping to $2,440 before recovering, indicating that the support below is currently quite solid.
Probability of an increase: 30%. There is some positive potential. Exchange ETH reserves have dropped to the lowest level since 2016, and the ESR indicator also hit a new low since 2016, showing chips are tightly locked; ETFs attracted $216 million in a single day yesterday, a near one-month high; Coinbase premium rebounded from -0.05% to -0.026%, indicating US buying is recovering. As long as it breaks through and closes above the $2,550 weekly line, $2,700–$3,000 is not impossible.
Probability of a decrease: 70%. Currently, the bears hold more cards. Wintermute deposited 61,800 ETH (about $160 million) to exchanges, which may not necessarily be for selling but is unsettling; the most troubling is that 196 whales are distributing while only 125 are accumulating; large bullish holders are crowded to a historic high of 2.23, but the probability of a rate hike at the September 16 FOMC meeting has surged to 87.3%. Any negative news triggering a long squeeze could push the price deeper, like a guillotine hanging overhead. Technically, the MACD now shows a hidden bearish divergence at the top, and RSI is declining, in a neutral to bearish state.
In summary, the short-term outlook is bearish with volatility, but the mid-term bullish logic remains intact. Enter with light positions and wait for the FOMC outcome before deciding the direction.$BTC A liquidation heatmap, clearly showing the 76000 barrier
On September 13, according to Coinglass data: if BTC falls below 76000, the mainstream CEX long position liquidation intensity will reach 394 million.
First, clarify one thing: liquidation intensity does not necessarily mean it will explode to 394 million; it means there is a large cluster of long forced liquidation orders piled up at this price level. Once broken through, it can easily trigger passive chain sell-offs, with more people getting liquidated as the price drops, amplifying the downward momentum.
On the other side, around 78000 above is a dense short position area; breaking through will trigger 227 million in short position liquidation intensity, meaning a pull-up is likely to force shorts to cover and cause a rebound.
The current range is straightforward: 76000 is the powder keg for longs, 78000 is the powder keg for shorts.
Both sides are heavily leveraged, with the area around 77000 acting as a temporary buffer zone. When no major funds actively attack, the price grinds in the middle; once one side is pierced, the liquidation wave can easily push the market a long way.
Adding the interest rate hike expectations hanging overhead, this is not just a simple technical battle, but a high-risk window of macro sentiment plus leveraged cluster resonance. Don’t think 76000 is just an ordinary support; it’s a lifeline for a large group of longs; nor think that breaking 78000 means a big bull market, it’s just concentrated short stop-losses.
Bitter truth:
Liquidation levels are risk warnings, not trading signals.
Don’t try to bottom-fish just because there’s heavy liquidation below; when it really breaks through, the chain sell pressure will far exceed expectations; and don’t chase longs just because there’s short covering above, fake breakouts to trap shorts and longs happen every day. 文章2｜标题：震荡市里，管住手比看准方向更重要 震荡行情最磨人，上一秒以为要突破，下一秒又被拉回区间。很多人不是没赚到钱，而是赚到了又被来回洗回去。 $ETH 在多轮震荡中守住仓位，利润没有被打乱。震荡市的关键，不是每波都抓住，而是别被假突破带偏。 $ZEC 空单踩对节奏，确实吃到一段收益，但这种高杠杆机会带有很强偶发性。把偶然当必然，是交易里最危险的误区。 大饼剧烈波动后又收回原位，说明区间还没有被真正打破。在这种情况下，频繁追涨杀跌，很容易两头挨打。 小盘币行情更不稳定，暴涨暴跌切换得毫无征兆。看起来机会很多，实际上陷阱也最多。 交易最难的部分，不是开仓，而是平仓和收手。很多单子本来可以盈利离场，结果因为想再多拿一段，最后全部回吐。 当前阶段，别强求每天都有交易。看不懂就空仓，没把握就轻仓，管住手，比频繁操作更重要。 想问下大家：震荡行情里，你会强制控制交易次数吗？ #管住手 #震荡市 #交易心态$BTC
Latest news: The US deficit has exploded… $1.97 trillion! Is this good or bad for risk assets?
In the first 11 months of fiscal 2026, the deficit was **$1.97 trillion**.
In simple terms, earning $4.85 trillion, spending $6.81 trillion, nearly $2 trillion short, all borrowed.
Like earning 5,000 a month but spending 7,000, covering the difference with credit cards.
Where did the money go?
Social security and healthcare, aging population, can’t cut these.
Interest on national debt, paid **$1.05 trillion** in the first 11 months, more than defense + education + commerce combined.
Old debts mature and must be refinanced at high interest rates, the snowball keeps growing.
More dramatically, tariffs were ruled illegal, about **$100 billion** previously collected may have to be refunded, income isn’t increasing, expenses are exploding.
So what about risk assets?
Keep reading.
🔥 Bullish: Gold, Bitcoin.
The worse the fiscal situation, the more worried about dollar depreciation, money flows into assets that resist devaluation. Recently, with a weak dollar, gold and Bitcoin have both risen.
❄️ Bearish: High-valuation tech stocks, commercial real estate.
The government issues more bonds, pushing US Treasury yields higher, the 10-year yield once approached **5%**. When rates rise, valuations get crushed.
Strategists say if the 10-year breaks **4.8%**, fiscal problems spread to the stock market; if the 30-year can’t stay below **5%**, systemic sell-offs may occur.
Now the market pricing logic has changed; it’s not just about the economy, it’s about pricing in “fiscal risk.”
Holding gold and Bitcoin feels completely different from holding high-valuation growth stocks. #日银年内再加息成焦点 Verifying whether CORE has moved beyond narrative, just look at these 3 indicators (the 2nd is the most critical)
⚠️This article is only an on-chain logic popular science review and does not constitute any investment advice
Many people looking at CORE can easily be misled by the grand BTCFi narrative, unable to distinguish whether the project is truly landing or still stuck in storytelling. Ignore the community's various bullish and bearish debates, just focus on 3 quantifiable on-chain indicators. Among them, the second indicator is the watershed between "narrative" and "real business."
Indicator 1: Whether the native BTC staking volume can continue to grow steadily
The core foundation of CORE is native BTC non-custodial staking based on Bitcoin CLTV scripts. The staked BTC remains on the Bitcoin mainnet, with private keys held by users, ensuring the security of the underlying assets. This is also its biggest highlight distinguishing it from ordinary L1 public chains.
- ✅ Healthy signal: The amount of native staked BTC steadily increases over the long term, with institutional funds continuously entering, not just short-term activity spikes. The historical peak once exceeded 5,000 coins, currently maintained at 2,335 coins.
- ❌ Risk signal: Staking volume continuously declines, large holders keep unlocking and withdrawing, indicating they do not recognize long-term value and are only mining rewards short-term.
Note: Staking volume only proves the underlying staking infrastructure is usable; it does not prove that the CORE token itself has value capture ability, only the first threshold.
Indicator 2: Whether the ecosystem's real fee income can cover token inflation selling pressure (most critical)
This is the project's lifeline and the core distinction between pure narrative and real business.
Currently, the rewards users get from staking are tokens newly issued by CORE blocks, which are inflation subsidies. New CORE is released daily, with circulating supply approaching 1.5 billion coins, causing long-term dilution of holdings.
- ✅ Truly moving beyond narrative: lstBTC, AMP asset management, SatPay lending generate real fee income, and the project uses business revenue to buy back CORE, gradually reducing issuance rewards. When ecosystem cash flow can offset daily new token selling pressure, the flywheel truly starts spinning.
- ❌ Still storytelling: All income sources still rely on token issuance, fees are minimal, and buybacks remain only in roadmap plans. Even if BTC staking increases, it only attracts funds with new tokens, a typical incentive mining narrative.
Grantham's mean reversion logic fully applies here: no matter how good the technical infrastructure is, if it relies on printing tokens for rewards long-term without sustained business cash flow, inflation selling pressure will suppress token valuation.
Indicator 3: lstBTC institutional channel landing, bringing continuous incremental funds
Retail funds are limited in size; to scale the ecosystem, large BTC funds from custodial institutions like BitGo and Fireblocks must be attracted. lstBTC is a liquidity staking certificate designed specifically for institutions, solving the liquidity pain point of locked staking.
- ✅ Healthy signal: Institutions batch mint lstBTC, traditional large BTC holders continuously participate, bringing long-term stable incremental funds, not just retail mining.
- ❌ Risk signal: Institutional cooperation only stays at signing and promotion, no large-scale fund landing, lstBTC trading volume is sluggish, persistent discounts appear, institutions dare not invest heavily.
In summary, the logical sequence of the three indicators:
Native BTC staking volume proves the technical infrastructure can run; ecosystem fees covering inflation prove the business model is established; lstBTC institutional funds landing prove market demand is realized.
Only when all three conditions are met can CORE be considered truly beyond narrative; if only the first is met and the other two show no progress, no matter how beautiful the BTCFi story is, it still belongs to L1 public chain narrative hype.
Do not be swayed by community emotional rhetoric like "ten-thousand times" or "golden pit." Track narratives are just expectations; on-chain data is the objective answer. Before all three indicators are fulfilled, it can only be regarded as a high-risk narrative gamble, and heavy all-in bets should be avoided.
💬 Interactive question: Among these three indicators, besides fees, which do you think is the hardest to achieve? Let's discuss in the comments!Which of the market’s former stars is quietly losing momentum?
$ARB surged 86% in a month but is now cooling off—wait for support and stabilization instead of chasing.
$HYPE has slipped from $89.65 to $79, with $77.5 key support. Falling revenue makes catching the bottom risky.
$UNI remains stuck near $6.05, waiting for a DeFi rotation.
Three coins, three setups: ARB needs a reset, HYPE needs a turnaround, and UNI needs momentum. Watch for the first one to stop falling on lower volume.
$BTC 🎯 ETH Long Positions | $2482.2 | 09-13 18:35 📍 Ambush zone: 1️⃣ 2480-2484 (daily E9 2483 + buy block $2481) 2️⃣ 2468-2472 (24h low 2468.4) 🛡️ Stop loss: $2462 (24h low×0.997) 🎯 Target: 🦋 2504 (1h E9), 🗡️ 2513 (1h E21), ⭐ 2545 (24h high) 📊 Resonance: 3.5/5 slightly bullish | RSI 1h 21.6 Deeply Oversold 🧠 Smart Money: Nearly 10 levels with buying pressure at 2.18x (1h ago was still 0.51x selling pressure, already bullish); Buy Wall $2481 Single level 14,527 contracts account for 24%, right under 💡 my feet. Reasons: 1. Daily bullish alignment not broken — price 2482 close to day E9 2483, still above E21 2424 / E55 2233 / E200 2200; Daily ADX 51 strong bullish (+DI 33 vs -DI 14) → Medium-term base firm 2. The market is shifting from selling pressure to buying pressure (0.51x→2.18x) + $2481 large buy wall = support after sharp drop/price pressure accumulation, no distribution 3. 1h RSI 21.6 oversold + ADX 46 sharp drop at the end, high probability of a technical rebound 4. Backtest: 8FOMC 2-Day Countdown: $BTC Weekly Chart Turns Down, ETH ETF Attracts Funds Against the Trend
$BTC **: About 77,275, 24H -0.02%, weekly chart -3.38%, ending a three-week winning streak. **$ETH: About 2,524, 24H +0.45%, weekly chart +0.88%, relatively resilient to declines.
ETF funds are clearly diverging. During the trading week of September 8-11, BTC spot ETFs saw a net outflow of $462.7 million, turning negative for the first time in four weeks, with net outflows recorded on all four trading days, and a single-day outflow of $282.7 million on Thursday. ETH ETFs saw net inflows of $196.9 million, marking four consecutive weeks of net inflows. On Friday, single-day inflows were $216.4 million, with BlackRock ETHA contributing $148.8 million.
Macroeconomic events are overlapping. Core CPI for August exceeded expectations, and the probability of a rate hike in September rose to about 90%. Goldman Sachs changed from a forecast of a 25 basis point hike to a 25 basis point hike, while JPMorgan changed to one hike each in September and December. On September 15, the Senate held a procedural vote on the Clarity Act, requiring 60 votes; Polymarket shows only a 20% chance of passing the bill in 2026.
Key levels: BTC supports at 76,000, resistance at 78,500; ETH supports at 2,500; if it falls below 2,409, there is a risk of $645 million long liquidation. #PPI. After the CPI release, several institutions raised their September rate hike expectations to $#BTC现货ETF三日流出近4 50 million Let's cool the hype around $UNI for a moment. Its recent rally may depend more on Robinhood than many realize.
UNI gained 130% in 90 days, fueled by expectations of the fee switch. But protocol revenue depends on trading activity, and Robinhood's DEX reportedly does over $3B in daily volume, with Uniswap handling ~98%.
If Robinhood launches its own AMM or changes partners, UNI's revenue stream could shrink fast. Bulls cite the CFTC settlement, +73.6% monthly gain..#SeptHikeOddsHit90% $LSK ’s chart just left a crime scene.
$LSK ripped above $2, then gave back most of the move within hours. The forensic clue: $41.13M liquidated, including $33.68M in shorts—roughly 4× long liquidations.
Translation: forced buying helped build the rocket; forced selling helped dismantle it.
OKX spot now shows LSK near $0.52
A 500% #candle can disappear faster than it arrived.🚨 Two consecutive losses. Confidence gone. But the real danger now isn’t the loss—it’s trying to win it back too quickly.
Look at the profit curve.
235 → 225 in just one day.
Both trades went wrong. Anyone would feel shaken after that.
Let’s break down what happened.
First, the ETH short.
Down 24%.
Was the logic completely wrong? I don’t think so.
CPI and PPI were weighing on the market. Rate-hike expectations were heating up. The macro picture still looked bearish.
#DailyOrbit I still believe SOL can recover in value eventually, just probably not during this week’s FOMC volatility. For now, the downside risk is actually increasing. If the $100 level fails decisively, there isn’t much technical support underneath. 1. Ecosystem liquidity matters more than the macro narrative The biggest thing I’m watching is capital activity within Solana itself. Solana’s DEX volume has remained ahead of CEX volume for nine consecutive weeks, showing that liquidity and trading activity $BTC doesn’t need to move every day to remain interesting.
Sometimes the best thing Bitcoin can do is simply hold its ground while the market tries to figure itself out.
That’s where I pay attention.
Not every sideways move is weakness.
Sometimes it is the market absorbing previous gains, clearing out leverage, and deciding where the next real demand will come from.
I’d rather watch that process than chase every green candle.
Bitcoin has already shown that it can survive extreme volatility.
The bigger question is always:
Who is still willing to buy when the excitement disappears ?
#SeptHikeOddsHit90% #OracleAICloudUp121% #OutcomesOnOrbit $5 billion, $2 billion from placement, and $3 billion in zero-coupon convertible bonds—Zhipu's funding round is considered large in any market.
The zero-coupon convertible bond structure is worth a closer look. Investors giving up interest in exchange for future convertible equity are essentially betting pricing power on the next generation of GLM.
As a long-term holder, what matters most to me is not whether the money arrives, but when the self-training system and computing infrastructure will become usable model capabilities.
Financing is already happening, model progress is planned, and execution is still in between the two.
Wait for a signal: when the next-generation GLM is released, see if it can use that money to truly differentiate training scale.
Before that, 5 billion was just a figure on paper.
#英伟达拟向Anthropic投资最高100亿美元
#OpenAICEO称2026年不会IPO #财报观察员: Oracle AI Cloud revenue up 121% $GLM I keep feeling like something is missing in this rally? There are wars everywhere, countries are full of conflicts, it's not that I'm overly projecting reality onto the crypto world, but the macro foundation really can't support this surge!
Let's talk data:
1. The Fear and Greed Index is only 32 (fear), with extreme greed accounting for just 4.77%. Retail investors and new funds haven't entered the market at all; everyone is watching.
2. CoinGlass 24-hour liquidation heatmap is almost all green. $ETH liquidations at 45.92 million, $BTC liquidations at 22.75 million. All shorts getting liquidated, this is naked leverage short squeeze, not spot buying!
The real world is engulfed in war, big money is fully risk-averse. Without macro liquidity, a market pushed up by internal leverage killing each other is just a castle in the air.
Once the short squeeze momentum fades, who will take over? The big ones are still coming. I won't take part in this consensus-lacking fake rally. This time I choose to be bearish, waiting for a liquidity drought storm! #BTC现货ETF三日流出近4.5亿美元 #PPI、CPI公布后，多家机构上调9月加息预期 $BTC's weekend movement honestly made people a bit sleepy.
It has been hovering around 77181, currently priced at 77126, with fluctuations so small there's almost no room for trading. The 45-minute cycle is still slowly bottoming below the zero line, a typical "calm before the storm."
🎯 Market outlook: Key levels to watch closely
First, the most important—76828.
✅ Holding 76828: short-term room for a rebound
❌ Breaking below 76828: will test the 12-hour support at 76000, and if broken, the daily core support at 72860
The midpoint of the range is at 77168; price standing above this line means the strong structure can still hold. The 4-hour MACD is still grinding below zero, KDJ is flat and tangled, RSI near 44, basically a stalemate between bulls and bears.
📰 News outlook: This week is the real test
Don’t be fooled by the weekend calm; the next few days are the main event:
① CPI data is hawkish. US August core CPI rose 0.3% month-over-month, exceeding expectations, pushing market bets on a Fed rate hike at the next meeting up to 85%. This short-term pressure indeed suppresses Bitcoin’s immediate upside.
② But there is a hidden medium-term positive. CoinShares research head James Butterfill pointed out that the expanded US Treasury repo program has not effectively lowered long-term yields. If this continues, larger-scale interventions may be forced, triggering concerns about currency depreciation—bullish for Bitcoin and gold.
③ Next week’s FOMC is the biggest variable. The Fed meeting on the 15th-16th, the dot plot, and Powell’s (or the new chair’s) press conference will directly decide the next direction. Meanwhile, the CLARITY Act will proceed to Senate voting, and institutional fund flows could shift at any time.
④ On-chain data is worth noting. CryptoQuant data shows that in the 77100-80200 range, long-term holders sold about 539,000 BTC in the past 30 days, indicating significant supply resistance. But a true breakout above the 81,700 365-day moving average would confirm a new bull market.
💡 My view
The Fear & Greed Index is 60 today, down from 65, showing cooling market sentiment. Honestly, this sideways movement itself is a signal—bulls aren’t panicking, and bears haven’t gained an advantage.
Jiang Zhuoer maintains a neutral position with full BTC shorts plus ETH spot, expecting a sweep up to the 76k liquidation zone before a pullback. I tend to think the low weekend volatility is energy accumulation; watch the 76828 line closely—holding it means there’s still a chance, breaking it means don’t hesitate.
Next, focus on the strength of the follow-through after tonight and tomorrow’s US stock market open. The direction will emerge soon; don’t get left behind at the last moment.
📌 The above is only my personal market review and does not constitute investment advice. Manage your positions carefully. After watching the market all day, $BTC ultimately failed to hold 77,000. Just now, a waterfall drop directly smashed down to 76,562, now struggling around 76,750.
I'm not waiting anymore, going short directly.
The previously mentioned 77,000 support, once broken, is as fragile as paper. On the chart, EMA5, 10, and 20 all turned downwards to suppress, and there isn't even a decent lower shadow on the 1-hour timeframe, indicating bulls have no resistance at all; it's all stop-losses and liquidation orders trampling each other.
Macroscopically, CPI remains firm, rate hike expectations approach 90%, and the FOMC decision is in two days. ETFs have been bleeding for four consecutive days, and funds are moving to safe havens.
My operation:
Light short position near the current price of 76,800, stop loss set at 77,800, target first at 76,000, if broken then directly look at 74,000-75,000. $BTC → scarcity that compounds into monetary strength.
$ETH → liquidity that compounds into financial infrastructure.
$SOL → activity that compounds into powerful network effects.
$BTC strengthens as more capital treats it as neutral collateral.
$ETH becomes harder to displace as stablecoins, DeFi, and applications keep building around its settlement layer.
$SOL is turning cheap, fast execution into a moat for high-frequency on-chain activity.
Three different paths. Is CORE, which lets Bitcoin collect rent by itself, truly BTCFi infrastructure or just another round of L1 storytelling?
⚠️ This article is only an on-chain logic popular science review and does not constitute any investment advice.
This question is also the biggest division in the CORE community: some say it has created truly essential BTCFi infrastructure, while others believe it is just an ordinary EVM L1 narrative wrapped in a BTC shell. Objectively breaking it down, part of it is real infrastructure that has been implemented, while a large portion is still at the L1 public chain narrative stage. The two are layered, not simply black or white.
✅ This part is true BTCFi infrastructure, not storytelling
The only irreplaceable, already operational hardcore part of CORE is the native BTC non-custodial staking based on Bitcoin's native CLTV script.
- Staked BTC remains entirely on the Bitcoin mainnet, in users' UTXOs, locked only by Bitcoin's underlying timelock, with no transfers, no WBTC wrapping, no cross-chain bridges, and private keys are not handed over to third parties; it automatically unlocks upon maturity; project teams and nodes cannot move the underlying BTC.
- The relayer only reports staking metadata to the CORE chain to participate in Satoshi Plus consensus. This mechanism was not invented by CORE, but it is the earliest project to make this mechanism a usable product, attracting thousands of native BTC to enter. Currently, there are 2,335 BTC stably staked on-chain, with a peak exceeding 5,000 BTC. This is real on-chain asset behavior, not empty narrative.
- Essentially, it solves the long-standing binary pain point of BTC yield: custodial risk / WBTC bridge risk. This layer indeed opens a new yield channel for cold wallet dormant BTC.
- This is also the most fundamental difference from most ordinary L1s: other public chains can only use wrapped BTC, while CORE can use native timelocked BTC for consensus staking.
❌ The remaining majority is still standard L1 public chain narrative (not yet verified)
1. The yield itself is not BTC rent but CORE inflation subsidy
The "rent" users receive from staking BTC is not BTC income generated from lending/fees but newly minted CORE tokens. This is similar to Babylon and Stacks, where the underlying BTC is locked, but the yield comes from the release of native tokens on top. The so-called "Bitcoin rent collection" at this stage is BTC exchanged for CORE rewards.
2. EVM public chain + DeFi ecosystem + lstBTC + AMP + SatPay flywheel is a roadmap narrative
Compatibility with EVM, building a complete DeFi ecosystem, lstBTC liquidity certificates, asset management lending, fee buyback tokens—this approach is a typical new public chain expansion path. Currently, the ecosystem's real fee scale is very small, the self-sustaining flywheel has not been established, income buybacks have not materialized, and main incentives still rely on issuance. Circulating supply approaches 1.5 billion, and long-term inflation selling pressure is the biggest cost of this narrative stage.
3. The upper-layer system is an independent L1 with independent contract risks
The August 31 vulnerability occurred in the reward distribution contract, not the CLTV-locked BTC script, which confirms the layering: BTC staking infrastructure is secure, but that does not mean the CORE L1 or CORE token is secure. BTC principal and reward tokens have two completely independent risk surfaces.
4. Strong competition in the field: Babylon focuses on multi-chain secure staking, Stacks uses Transfer Proof, RSK runs BTC two-way anchored DeFi; all do native BTC staking, so CORE is not the only infrastructure option.
One sentence to distinguish the boundary
CLTV native non-custodial BTC staking is differentiated BTCFi infrastructure that has been implemented; while a complete EVM ecosystem, fee self-sustainability, large-scale institutional entry, and token value capture are still grand L1-level narratives. It is not a pure air-story L1, but it is far from a fully self-consistent BTCFi infrastructure stage. The easiest confusion is equating the effectiveness of the underlying staking infrastructure directly with the full realization of the upper-layer CORE token and ecosystem narrative.
Subsequent verification of whether it moves beyond narrative depends on three indicators
1. Native BTC staking volume continues steady growth without relying on short-term activities
2. lstBTC generates real fees in lending/asset management, business income materializes for buybacks, gradually replacing inflation rewards
3. Institutional channels like BitGo bring large-scale native BTC, not just retail mining
From Grantham's perspective: technology infrastructure being real does not mean the current token valuation lacks narrative premium. Infrastructure can be established, but token value capture still faces mean reversion tests. You can acknowledge it has created a useful underlying BTCFi component, but don't mistake the component for a fully built city.
💬 Interactive question: Do you think CORE will ultimately become a "BTC-dedicated staking infrastructure" or continue on the general EVM L1 path? Which path is easier to succeed? Let's discuss in the comments.CRV Price Scenario Simulation and Forecast After Full Circulation
The maximum cap of CRV is 3.03 billion tokens. Important to clarify first: CRV does not have a "one-time full circulation after several years"; LP mining rewards are released annually with a decreasing rate, theoretically taking hundreds of years to reach the 3.03 billion cap. There is no specific day when 100% of tokens suddenly become fully circulating. Below, we assume a hypothetical scenario where all 3.03 billion tokens enter the market circulation at some future point.
Scenario Calculation (Full circulation of 3.03 billion tokens)
Formula: Token Price = Total Market Cap ÷ 3.03 billion
Scenario 1: Conservative (Typical DeFi bear market/sideways)
Total Market Cap: $800 million
Token Price = 8 ÷ 30.3 ≈ $0.26
Scenario 2: Neutral (A normal bull market, CRV returns to historical median valuation)
Total Market Cap: $3 billion
Token Price = 30 ÷ 30.3 ≈ $0.99, about $1
Scenario 3: Optimistic Bull Market, stablecoin sector explosion, large-scale adoption of crvUSD
Total Market Cap: $6 billion
Token Price = 60 ÷ 30.3 ≈ $1.98, about $2
Scenario 4: Super Bull Market, CRV returns to historical peak market cap
Total Market Cap: $12 billion
Token Price = 120 ÷ 30.3 ≈ $3.96, about $4
To reach the much-anticipated $10 price under full circulation, CRV’s total market cap needs to surge to $30.3 billion. This market cap scale surpasses most current DEX public chains and requires extremely challenging super bull market conditions.
🔴 Key Point: Full circulation itself is not bullish; it actually brings selling pressure
1. Although a large amount of CRV tokens are unlocked now, about 68% are locked in veCRV, so the freely circulating tokens available for selling are not as many as they seem. Full circulation means all mining rewards are no longer locked and can be sold directly, significantly increasing selling pressure. At the same market cap, the token price after full circulation will be lower than under partial lock-up.
2. CRV inflation decreases year by year, not a one-time sell-off, but continuous LP mining output suppresses the price long-term; protocol fee income is distributed to veCRV locked users, token burn is weak, lacking a strong deflationary mechanism.
3. A high 68% popularity in watchlists only means many people are paying attention; attention ≠ actual buying with real money. Many just observe without entering the market, causing high watchlist but low price situations.
✅ Necessary conditions to support CRV price increase after full circulation
1. Large-scale adoption of crvUSD stablecoin, with protocol fee income multiplying;
2. Stablecoin swap sector maintains leading position, trading volume continuously hitting new highs;
3. veCRV lock-up culture continues, even if all tokens are unlocked, many users voluntarily lock tokens, reducing actual circulating sell pressure;
4. Overall crypto super bull market, with massive new capital flowing into DeFi.
If the above conditions are not met, even full circulation will see inflationary selling pressure continuously suppressing the price.
📌 Summary
Assuming all 3.03 billion CRV tokens enter circulation:
- Normal market: oscillation between $0.25 and $0.4
- Reasonable target in a standard bull market: around $1
- Full business realization in a big bull market: around $2
- $10 is a grand fantasy, requiring a market cap in the tens of billions, with extremely high entry barriers.
Note that in reality, CRV will not suddenly become fully circulating on a single day; it will be slowly released over hundreds of years. The real market situation will be between the current state and the above "full circulation assumption." $BTC On September 15, the CLARITY bill will undergo a crucial procedural vote in the Senate. Attention! This isn't the final vote, but a first decision—whether this bill, which has been in the process for over a year, still has the right to continue discussion. To enter the formal debate and amendment process, the core threshold is: 60 votes! Currently, the Republican Party only has 53 seats. Even if all Republicans support it, at least seven Democratic lawmakers still need to vote in favor. So to be honest, this threshold is not low at all. And what is the market most afraid of right now? It's not the bill itself, but the expectation that it has been speculated on for so long. If the procedural vote on September 15 fails—the market will likely interpret it as: "It's over again." The expectations speculated earlier are starting to materialize, BTC leads the way, small coins get beaten up, and a wave of sentiment hits hard, which definitely won't look good. But on the other hand! If 60 votes are really secured and the process proceeds smoothly—then the script is completely different. Because this means the CLARITY Act has finally passed the most critical hurdle, and the market will resume trading the expectation of the "U.S. crypto regulatory framework being implemented." Don't underestimate the capital sentiment then. BTC might move first, and the altcoins might follow right after. So now it's a typical example: vote failure → disappointed → negative news fulfilled, vote success → rekindled expectations → accelerated sentiment. And brothers, don't forget, the Fed is about to start stirring things up too. One is the regulatory billJust look at the data and you'll understand. The 24-hour liquidation heatmap is all green for short sellers' deaths, while the Fear & Greed Index is only 32 (fear). This is not a bull market bought by spot trading, but pure leveraged short squeezing. Think about the real world—war raging and contradictions everywhere. If you compare reality to the crypto world, you're right—the macro foundation is unstable, big money doesn't dare to enter, relying entirely on intra-market leverage to kill each other. The biggest fear in short squeeze markets is FOMO chasing highs. If the index hasn't entered 'extreme greed,' it means incremental funds are watching. The big ones haven't arrived yet—hold your bullets tight, don't be the next bull market that gets harvested! $ETH $BTC $SOL An ancient asset from 2016, current market cap around $500M. Funding is negative, 4-hour cycle. Liquidity isn't very large but volatility is strong → Both Long and Short positions can be liquidated if entered at the wrong timing. 👉 $LSK: don't FOMO when you see a pump, and don't be overconfident to Short just because funding is negative. 💀$BTC is currently most dangerous, not because of a direct drop, but possibly because it will first shake out both shorts and longs. Jiang Zhuoer’s scenario is very clear: first watch the $76,000 liquidation zone for BTC, and around $2,665 for ETH. First clear out these positions, then the real directional choice will come.
If BTC surges to 76K and then holds above 75K and strengthens again, the market might continue pushing towards the high resistance zone of 80K, or even $83,000–$84,000.#苹果公司市值重回全球首位，超越英伟达
I am the mid-term intelligence guy.
Apple's market value returning to the global top spot doesn't mean Apple suddenly got better; it's that Nvidia's “AI spending anxiety” has eased off the gas first.
$AAPL, relying on a base of 250 million devices, service revenue, foldable screens, and Apple Intelligence expectations,
is being embraced by capital as a “certainty asset”;
$NVDA's fundamentals haven't collapsed, but the market is starting to ask: who will pay for the trillion-dollar capital expenditure, and how long until it breaks even?
From my perspective, this is a mid-term signal shifting from “valuing dreams” back to “paying for cash flow.”
Apple wins by being steady, not by crazily building data centers;
Nvidia loses because expectations are too full and valuation too heavy.
Don't interpret this as AI being over—AI is still here, it's just that capital is no longer willing to blindly chase the shovel.
In terms of operations, Apple can be seen as a slow bull if it pulls back without breaking the trendline; Nvidia should wait until AI capital expenditure expectations become clear again before considering adding positions.
The king of stocks changing hands is not the end, but the bell of style switching.【$ETH drops to 2483, RSI falls below 14—Is this the last "shakeout" before the FOMC?】
ETH continues to probe lower today, breaking below 2483, with RSI(6) plunging to 13.67, marking the deepest oversold level in recent days. I haven't found any specific bad news today; this seems more like a routine position reduction ahead of the interest rate meeting—only two days remain until the September 15-16 FOMC, and market sentiment usually becomes more cautious before such key events. Traders tend to reduce positions early and lock in risk rather than heavily betting on direction before the decision is announced.
An RSI level of 13.67 historically indicates that short-term selling pressure is quite extreme, but extreme oversold conditions don't mean an immediate rebound, especially before major macro events. Emotional venting may last longer than technical indicators suggest. The recent drop without news is often harder to pinpoint a bottom for than a drop with news—because it’s not pricing in a specific negative event but rather pricing in the "unknown" itself.
The real direction will likely only become clear after the FOMC decision is officially announced on September 15-16. Until then, this deep pullback without news support is better suited for observation rather than rushing to guess the bottom.
DYOR, this is not investment advice.
#ETH触及2500美元后震荡 #FOMC前最后一组数据：本周五非农 At the moment, I don’t see a strong chance of getting a clean downside move in the short term. Unless $BTC and $ETH trigger a much deeper market-wide correction, ZEC may continue holding relatively strong instead of delivering the sharp drop I’m waiting for. Looking at the current structure, $ZEC is consolidating around the $1,150 area. It pushed toward $1,200 after the latest CPI release, but failed to maintain those highs and pulled back afterward. That tells me ZEC is currently following the 🚨 On the eve of the FOMC, I'm actually a bit hesitant to chase anymore
The market these past two days has been quite interesting.
BTC started the week near 79,800, gradually grinding down to around 77,000.
After the PPI and CPI releases, rate hike expectations have clearly heated up. The market's main concern now isn't "will there be volatility," but rather:
Will the FOMC deliver another blow to the market?
Currently, I'm mainly watching a few key levels.
$BTC
76,000 is the first line of defense.
If 76K holds, I think there's still a chance to retest 80,000 or even 82,000.
But if 76K breaks down with volume, don't try to catch the fall; look again at 75K and 72K below.
At this point, the most uncomfortable position isn't the bulls or the bears.
It's those who opened high leverage positions, trying to profit on both sides.
$ETH
Around 2,500, there's been repeated tug-of-war.
Continuous inflows into ETH ETFs are indeed a relatively strong fundamental support right now, but until the FOMC decision lands, I still say:
A rebound is just a rebound; don't rush to call it a reversal.
Only if it firmly holds above 2,600 will I start seriously looking at upside potential.
$SOL
The $100 level is increasingly feeling like a psychological battle.
If it climbs back above 100 → there's still a chance to keep grinding.
If it stays below 100 → around 95 might be the real test.
As for DOGE...
Elon Musk hasn't spoken, so the dog can only lie low. 😂
My biggest feeling right now is:
Before the FOMC, the market easily creates the illusion of "about to take off."
Suddenly a spike up, shorts get liquidated;
Suddenly a drop, longs get wiped out.
Then everyone starts guessing:
"Is this the bottom?"
"Is the bull market back?"
Actually, it's still too early.
Before the decision comes out, I'd rather keep some bullets in reserve.
Wait for the direction to be clear before making a move; there's no shame in that.
After all, the biggest fear in trading isn't missing a move,
but wiping out your position early just to avoid missing out.
Tonight, do you think 76K will hold, or will 75K break?
$BTC $ETH #PPI、CPI公布后，多家机构上调9月加息预期 RISK / REWARD — THE MARKET IS TELLING A DIFFERENT STORY
I used to see red numbers and think the market was breaking. Today, the picture looks different.
$BTC -0.66% is holding better than $ETH -1.77%,$SOL -1.93%, $XRP -1.64% and $DOGE -1.50%.Capital appears more defensive, while ALT risk is being repriced.
Risk:ALT weakness continues if BTC stays below resistance.
Reward:If BTC stabilizes,ALT could rebound harder.
The question isn’t “what’s falling?” It’s where does Risk/Reward turn in my favor?Now I’m down to just 50U. Instead of giving up, I’m starting a small-account challenge to work my way back. 🎯 Stage 1 target: 1,000U Today I opened a new $ZEC short. Entry: 1,333 Current: 1,109 The trade reached more than 100% profit, adding around 20U to the account. $ZEC finally delivered the downside move I was waiting for this afternoon, so I decided to lock in the gains rather than stay greedy. Why close here? Because I believe the current correction could become much deeper, but protectinThe most easily misunderstood aspect of the Symbiosis security incident is the "46.1 billion syBTC".
The BridgeV2 anomaly message did indeed generate about 2^62 smallest units, equivalent to about 4.61 billion syBTC; however, the attacker has confirmed that only about 4.39 WBTC was exchanged, with actual cash-out around $336,000.
The team currently states that about 15 BTC have been recovered and the Bitcoin Bridge route has been suspended, with the final loss still being calculated.
Therefore, the most important fact to study right now is: the scale of abnormal minting does not equal the scale of real loss.
What really needs to be verified is whether the remaining assets can be recovered, when the BTC routing will resume, and how the final review explains why cross-chain message verification failed. #SeptHikeOddsHit90% #BTCSpotETF450MOutflow #OracleAICloudUp121% $FLOCK $FLOKI $FLOW
The flock market experienced intense volatility. The 24-hour trading range was 0.06189‑0.08675, with the current price at 0.08191, a daily increase of 11.36%, ranking 3rd on the platform's new coin list.
The one-hour candlestick chart clearly shows the price surged to 0.08675 but faced resistance and fell back, quickly dipping to 0.06189 for a deep retracement, then funds flowed back in, pulling the price back near 0.08 with back-and-forth tugging. The new contract order book depth is weak, liquidity is insufficient, frequent long wicks occur intraday, stop losses for both longs and shorts are repeatedly triggered, resulting in prominent long-short liquidation, and high leverage easily leads to liquidation.
Contract account data shows retail shorts account for 61.19%, longs only 38.81%, with a long-short ratio of 0.63. Retail traders are heavily shorting, posing a potential risk of a short squeeze and washout. Technically, short-term resistance is at 0.08675, the supertrend lower band at 0.0704 is key support, and the current price is oscillating near the moving averages, with no clear winner between bulls and bears yet.
The coin's market is entirely driven by DeAI thematic sentiment, the project commercialization is still in the pilot stage, and a large amount of tokens are yet to be unlocked, posing mid-to-long-term unlocking selling pressure. During the contract's initial volatile period, leverage should be kept low. #PPI、CPI公布后，多家机构上调9月加息预期 South Korea's law is stuck behind the budget bill in the queue
South Korea's upcoming "Basic Digital Asset Act" was originally planned to be pushed through within the year.
Now it looks very likely to be postponed to the first half of next year.
Where is it stuck:
The National Assembly is first busy with the national audit, then busy with the budget bill.
The bill is behind them in the queue—not rejected, just not yet its turn.
How this is calculated:
This month is for public hearings, and it will only enter review in November.
There are two procedural steps in between, and that's how the time gets squeezed out.
The STO roadmap has already been divided into phases, and institutions are testing the system.
The regulatory discussion is shifting to implementation, but implementation depends on scheduling.
After the public hearing, the bill text will be reviewed clause by clause.
#CLARITY替代修正案公布，贝森特呼吁参院推进 $ZEC BTC
Without getting too caught up in the details of the move, what stood out for me once again was price rejecting from the 50W MA - which ive sold... once again...
Its a bull market if price can convincingly reclaim and find acceptance above it... ideally supported by strong passive flows, rather than simply shorts unwinding before price rolls over again - as per today..
Still a range until it isn’t...
#SeptHikeOddsHit90% #BTCSpotETF450MOutflow #OracleAICloudUp121%